It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by Mehran
sorry but i didnt see any threats what so ever on what he said, notice how we can say what ever we want and nothing can happen to us so i really dont care.
I cannot believe that cannot read what is written
Originally posted by Contentious
1 in 2 American men, and 1 in 3 American women will develop some form of cancer in their lifetimes.
And a chemical that has been BANNED throughout the rest of the ENTIRE WORLD is still being injected into the American FOOD supply. It causes cancerous tumors and lymphnomas in EVERY lab-rat exposed to the drug, everybody KNOWS this... but since nobody in this country could PROVE that it does the same things to humans and they only have one customer left, the company that produces it took over the Fright-house so they can DUMP IT IN YOU!
I think Americans should just be quiet about it when reality cold cocks theim across the face too. By then, you probably won't have a choice and won't pose a threat because we will be like ZOMBIES from sucking down all the aspartame/formaldehyde in the diet food.
Soffritti said the fact that the rats in the study died of natural causes rather than being sacrificed at a specific point in their lives helped the researchers to better identify the cancer links.
But critics contend that this was a big problem with the study. Most cancer study guidelines recommend the sacrifice of research animals at specific ages -- in the case of the rats used in the study around 104 to 110 weeks.
That would be the equivalent of age 60 or so in humans. The last rat in the study died at 159 weeks of age.
"Rats, like people, develop a wide range of cancers in old age, and establishing whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship (at an age when cancers are common) is not possible," says Joe Poulos, a spokesman for Merisant, the company that makes the aspartame sweetener Equal.
"More than 200 toxicological and clinical studies have been conducted over the past 30 years, all of which have confirmed the safety of aspartame," he tells WebMD.
www.webmd.com...
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
It's political rhetoric aimed at a political regime.
Originally posted by Lysergic
So how many Nukes does Iran have?
and they're going to take out israel?
"If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave any thing in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world". Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani told the crowd at the traditional Friday prayers in Tehran.
IPS Article
“The use of an atomic bomb would totally destroy Israel, while (the same) against the Islamic world would only cause damage. Such a scenario is not inconceivable”…
NTI
Originally posted by DaFunk13Smiley...why do we bother?
Where is a good hole to hide in for the next 20 or 30 years?
Originally posted by kozmo
After reading this thread in it's entirety I would have to surmise that it is filled with ostrich. Far too many trusting liberals here.
Maybe he never stated anything about Wiping Israel off the map. Maybe he never stated that Israel should be moved to the US or Europe. Perhaps it was all a lie that he denied the holocaust and cursed the Jews.
In fact, the very existence of a nuclear program in Iran is merely a hoax perpetrated by the vast governmental conspiracy that we are all victim to, right?
Furthermore, they haven't been engaging in military exercises near the straight of Hormez
nor did they test 3 different types of missiles, which may or may not be able to accomodate nuclear warheads, within the past month.
Uranium enrichment is merely a fallacy and the UN has it all wrong despite this crackpot's own words!
The IAEA and El Baradei are Kooks imagining a nuclear program that is less than transparent in Iran.
And Iran has absolutely NO TIES whatsoever to terrorist organizations.
Sorry clueless ones... by the time you realize the truth it will be far too late.
Originally posted by Contentious
Are you so blind as to label Iran as a threat to your life when Israel has sucked the military "superpower" of the world into a war that accomodates Israel's desires, and the U.S. military has gone into their country and lauched a military strike against the same people that you have a problem with, because they are trying to obtain the ability to DEFEND THEMSELVES
U.S. TO SEND ONE TROOP TO IRAN
Rumsfeld: Army of One Can Get it Done
In an effort to punish the government of Iran for its nuclear ambitions, the Pentagon announced today that it was preparing to send one troop to Iran.
...
But Secretary Rumsfeld denied that by sending only one troop to Iran he was fighting the war there “on the cheap.”
“I am fully prepared to send one additional troop to help with the reconstruction,” he said.
Mr. Rumsfeld said that he fully expected his latest military strategy to come under fire from his detractors, but he had stern words of warning for those who would criticize it: “I would ask them to support our troop.”
"In the Army’s recruitment ads, they talk about an ‘Army of One,’” Mr. Rumsfeld said. “In the case of Iran, we are taking that literally.
"With U.S. troop levels stretched thin in Iraq and Afghanistan, sending Pvt. Klujian to deal with Iran on his own may have been a necessity, military analysts believe."
Originally posted by kozmo
*Post removed and replaced with an instance of....
Kano's Instant Board Rage Solution*
[edit on 14-4-2006 by dbates]