Stargates are real

Meant to reply earlier... yet kept being distracted.

Originally posted by undo
reply to post by dzonatas

 

and there's the other layers. as i mentioned, it isn't just an astronomy story and all the layers of it are equally important

Woot! We agree on this thing we have called 'coincidences'

Sometimes things need to render in several different ways in order to be considered true and divine by any degree. Sometime it is so different it seems completely unrelated. Someone that is Christian and someone that isn't may have two different experiences that 'coincidently' render a degree of truth and divinity when brought together.

I'm sure their opinions may be different on reasons to explain the coincidence, yet the fact remains between the two that the coincidence happened no matter if they know how it actually happened.

what concerns me is when someone who claims to be initiated into the mysteries, defines the reason for not sharing knowledge with the "profane" as a decision made because the profane has been judged unworthy to have that knowledge. and that had they been better people, they would qualify for such knowledge. it sounds just like religion that requires work to receive heaven, but in this case heaven is replaced with enlightenment. if a similarity can be legitimately drawn in that instance, i'd be one depressed hombre

Some people don't explain merely because (with the example of the coincidence above) to avoid any disagreement on how the coincidence happened. If there was to explain without disagreement or where one doesn't feel like their beliefs is being forced on the other, then I'm sure more would be explained.

Sometimes people who have knowledge that start to profess in that knowledge also get slammed with 'well if you have knowledge like a god then you must be perfect like a god, yet you aren't perfect'. Here, the bible works very well as a way to break the egos of those that think they are more knowledgable than others, because the common people feel obligated to know what the self-acclaimed prophet knows.

Some matters aren't meant to be published, like one probably wouldn't write a book on all the knowledge they know, yet they would share that with someone else in person.

If i could share something... well... I used think I'm nothing special and still think that way at times, yet I've been proven in 'mysterious' ways I was wrong to think that. Time and time again... I've got lots of reasons of stuff that has happened to me that it is a wonder I'm still alive or I haven't offed myself. Guess I finally reached that point of to say... I should be dead... but I'm not. To me, people who say they think hell has yet to happen, they just haven't realized we are in Heaven... they haven't yet realized to appreciate what we have. I have memories of being in 'nothing' and completely 'alone' and those memories are definitely beyond this mortal body. That is hell. Anything is better than that. Anything else is Heaven compared to those memories I have. Those memories obviously will never ever go away. They will be with me for every mortal body I have. They will awaken me every time I'm reborn. They are that strong. There is nothing about this mortal body that can explain them.

Hope you appreciate that little bit I shared rather you believe me or not.

-- Love

stargates are real, the proof you require is on channel 3 about 6pm mondays through fridays, detailing the work of stargate command.

reply to post by dzonatas

Here, the bible works very well as a way to break the egos of those that think they are more knowledgable than others, because the common people feel obligated to know what the self-acclaimed prophet knows

not sure what this means.

by the way, did you see the pics i posted of the white pile of stones that i thought might be the white pyramid of china? if so, did you see anything there?

reply to post by insanitygb


Ah yes, but did you know 2 egyptologists wrote the screenplay for the stargate film (the first one) based on their personal theories and that they sued devlin and company because when they had originally sent in the material, devlin declined to use it. then later, he changed a few things, didn't inform the original authors and made it anyway? devlin settled with them out of court. the poignant part is, it was based on their THEORIES.

now i know you don't care about that information, although i find it very interesting, but i thought i would give you an example of why the thread is here in the first place.

reply to post by undo




The Chinese White Pyramid has been found

It's pretty obvious that the Xian pyramids aren't the same. The Xian pyramids look more strictly for military purposes and abandoned once the Great Wall was built.

You can see the White Pyramid has decor that sets it apart from the others. The article also gets into all the burials they found nearby. The decor is man-made, yet the original White Pyramid is just a natural mountain. It would be hard to say its position has any meaning.

Should I have posted this in the other thread?

reply to post by dzonatas


ah well i was basing my search off of the report from the world war 2 pilot, who saw this white pyramid while flying reconnaisance for the chinese who were apparently fighting the japanese at the time on chinese soil. it was during world war 2. he said the thing was in a very narrow mountain range valley, that seemed especially inaccessible and only had a small area that looked like you might be able to land a plane, was on a trajectory south of xian. it was between xian and a place in india (i forget the name at the moment). it had what he described a gem like capstone and was a white color that appeared to have faded rainbow like colors on it, as if at one time, the white material had been painted over by the colors of the spectrum. he wasn't sure what the white material was, but he said it had a sheen to it like metal but could've been highly polished limestone. it was an interesting report

i spent some time trying to track down evidence of his report in the army-air force files from that time period, but he apparently was on a top secret mission at the time. he claims to have photographed it, but the photos were on the same roll as the rest of the top secret images and had to be filed top secret. even if the files had since been opened for public disclosure, the problem was it was in what is referred to as maritime theater and included every photograph taken in the pacific including the navy's photographs.

further research indicated that the photographs of the region were in some massive gov library archive in new york, and that the only way to find them was to pay to have the library research the files for it, or fly to new york myself.

i gave up at that point.




[edit on 26-8-2009 by undo]

Originally posted by dzonatas

It's pretty obvious that the Xian pyramids aren't the same. The Xian pyramids look more strictly for military purposes and abandoned once the Great Wall was built.

I did a lot of work finding them pyramids Took years

Pyramids of China - Revisited
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Chinese Pyramids
www.thelivingmoon.com...

Warning slow load as I have not split the page into sections yet

reply to post by undo


I wouldn't doubt there was more decor on the mountain, and that the flyer (the guy you mentioned who say the gem-like material) had an earlier view of the mountain before the decor either eroded or was moved. Lot of those trees look new, so there was certainly landscape changes made to support those trees.

This photo reminds me of close encounters of the third kind:
the runway before the mountain

The reason why the flyer didn't get a better view is because he wasn't in a plane. He was outfitted with bird like wings in order to glide through the area in camo. Obviously, the photos were classified becuase it was a partial spy/recon mission and the military isn't going to give up evidence for such recons so easily. It's not about what the photos contain, yet the scrutiny on the mission itself. He couldn't land at will, as there is a report of a back injury when he did finally land.

What isn't said in the reports is how much of the "mountain" is man-made and how much is natural. They show the photos where one slope is clearly man-made.

[edit on 26-8-2009 by dzonatas]

reply to post by dzonatas


there wasn't a runway before the mountain in his description. he said it only looked like there was one spot you might be able to land in but it was in such a narrow mountain range that he wasn't sure if you could land there at all. the area of the picture i provided is next to the panda sanctuary, separated by a line of mountains. it's off limits for flyovers so no new people would see it in this time, at least, not from the air.

there appears to be a barricade at the mouth of the valley attached to it, and second barricade at the valley in which its in, which gave me the impression that travel on the ground in that area was strictly monitored.

he also said it was south west of xian, in transit to assam india or something like that, in fact, about 30 miles south west of xian. that official white pyramid is northwest. wrong area. there's no reason to assume that just because they found one that's white or was white with different colors, that this is the exact same building the guy indicated, since it's possible that one is a copy of the older and more elaborate one seen by the pilot?

or, he could've just had his directions mixed up

If it is a copy, then how long would it even take to build such an enormous mountain. It's bigger than the great pyramid, and you know how many years that is said to have taken. People still don't believe the great pyramids were built so fast.

That's why in the report it noted that it may not be the same one, yet don't underestimate its size.

reply to post by dzonatas


i couldn't think of a reason why it wouldn't be on display to begin with and then it dawned me that if it was nearly identical in construction to the one at giza, that would prove several things, including that the pyramid builders were in china in the same timeframe as giza, perhaps raising many questions about the solitary sacredness of the one in giza, perhaps suggest an older or newer timeline than is officially maintained, and could contain any number of other pieces of information that might prove and/or disprove currently held, popular and archaegological theories.

even those reasons seem sorta flimsy unless it was outrageoulsy fantastic and made from some hitherto unknown materials. etc

reply to post by dzonatas


This is the original photo from 1947

The existence of pyramids in China has come in two stages. Most early stories were focused on the existence of "Great White Pyramid." A photograph of this pyramid in the Qinling mountains was taken by Americans in 1945, but remained in military files for 45 years. US Air Force pilot James Gaussman is said to have seen a white jewel-topped pyramid during a flight between India and China during World War II, but there is scant evidence for a source on this story.

However, it is now believed that the Gaussman story was actually based on Colonel Maurice Sheahan, Far Eastern director of Trans World Airlines, who told an eyewitness account of his encounter with a pyramid in the March 28, 1947 edition of The New York Times. A photo of Sheahan's pyramid appeared in The New York Sunday News on March 30, 1947. It is this photograph that later became attributed to James Gaussman.

t is now known, thanks to efforts of Chris Maier, that the particular pyramid shown in the photo is the Maoling Mausoleum. This pyramid sits just outside of Xi'an. In 1994, German tour operator and author Hartwig Hausdorf was noted for photographing and studying several pyramids.

www.crystalinks.com...

The Great White Pyramid itself (rather than the photograph), as described by Sheahan, remains unidentified.

This area looks like Giza I also know where these are Did the work back in 2006, just never had time to do a thread

reply to post by zorgon


If you compare the sloughs that run down the sides, you'll notice they don't match. How is it that one picture has them and the other doesn't show any. One shows man-made ziggeraut like stacked rocks, boulders, and cuts, and the other shows more dirt and not in a ziggeraut formation.

There is a lot of difference in the stores. Even in the story of the flyer.

Multicolored gems could create a metallic like look.If they had many from the stones, that could explain the effect.


[edit on 26-8-2009 by dzonatas]

reply to post by dzonatas


yeah, something odd about the whole thing. i also read somewhere that the etemenanki in babylon was multicolored. each layer was a different color of the rainbow. i found that odd because there's some evidence the etemenanki is a later name for the tower of babel, which was rebuilt countless times and kept getting ransacked.

Originally posted by dzonatas
If it is a copy, then how long would it even take to build such an enormous mountain.

You do realize that most of the Chinese pyramids are made of dirt?

Originally posted by dzonatas
If you compare the sloughs that run down the sides, you'll notice they don't match. How is it that one picture has them and the other doesn't show any. One shows man-made ziggeraut like stacked rocks, boulders, and cuts, and the other shows more dirt and not in a ziggeraut formation.

Huh? You mean the brown one I posted earlier? That is a different pyramid altogether The brown one is Xianyang #6 the one in the old photo Maoling's... There are several hundred scattered all over



[edit on 26-8-2009 by zorgon]

reply to post by zorgon


i think she was under the impression that it was said to be the white pyramid, same as the other one and that there was some discrepancy in appearance.

simple misunderstanding, methinks

reply to post by zorgon


Thought the question mainly centered around the White Pyramid, so I don't know why it it being confused with the Xi'an pyramids. I noted difference.

You did see the picture of the ziggerraut like formation? That's not just dirt.

reply to post by dzonatas


that does look like pyramid terraces.
interesting pic.

Originally posted by undo
simple misunderstanding, methinks

Yeah I just picked a random one

The rest are in the other thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Those terraces look like limestone and VERY weathered. I have not found any info on the supposed age of the pyramids... but I did this work in 2006 when I started here and its been on the shelf...

I will have to go and check for updates, but until recently not much info was available

There is a little on Wiki, but most other links are all the old ones
en.wikipedia.org...

AS to the dirt... It may be that the Chinese farmers covered them with dirt to use theme for terrace planting as you can see in the updated version of Mao Ling... This one does match the little b&w photo



But I think we are getting far way from Stargates now

[edit on 26-8-2009 by zorgon]