It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nullster Said:
Sorry, but resurecting an old thread for for personal Spamming purposes is self serving. Maybe we should all make malicious and pretencious posts to draw ire from other members so we can make allot of points.
Mods please intervene.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
What a lousy attitude. Why do you care what gets posted? ... Snipped rant
Originally posted by redmage
Sorry debunkers this thread is not for you. These things are supernatural by nature, which means literally: not existing in nature or subject to explanation according to natural laws. Therefore arguing existance or proof is a mute point. This is a matter of personal experience and/or belief.
Originally posted by redmage
I must say, I find your posts interesting. Admittedly, it's hard to believe entirely when the "facts" of your experiences are mixed with things so subjective as the notion that these beings are "perfect". Advanced? Sure. Superior? Possibly. Perfect? By what standard?
As to them "not needing entertainment"........they have us It reminds me of the South Park episode spoofing "reality TV", where Earth is/was the best rated intergalactic reality TV show but was to be destroyed due to a ratings slip.
As to the "rock picture", where was this posted?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, you use the phrases "ET" and "them" often yet I seem to recall you in another thread acknowledging many different "species" here on earth. Are they all "perfect" in your eyes or just one specific "race/species"? Which "race/species" do you have experience/s with?
I do admire the "cool head" you've maintained through all the attacks.
If nothing else, you do present interesting ideas/philosophies on alien interventions through our history.
Originally posted by sleeper
Non-believers of extraterrestrial intelligent life are a dime-a-dozen
This forum is for those who are curious about extraterrestrials and for those few people who have had experiences they wish to share about extraterrestrials.
Originally posted by anglodragon
Spot on Durden
Ignorant belief is as bad as ignorant disbelief, hence "Deny Ignorance" rather than "Deny Disbelief".
The whole field has suffered from cranks with fanciful tales and nothing to back their claims, another crank adds nothing, especially when that crank resorts to ignorant lines such as "Well, I don't care if you believe me I know" - It offers nothing of value to this forum that you can't get from the Sci-Fi shelf at your local bookshop.
Expecting blind belief oh the basis of fanciul stories and nothing else only serves to fuel the "cultish behaviour" tag placed on such cranks.
AD.
[edit on 25-1-2006 by anglodragon]
Originally posted by Durden
So your point for starting this particular thread is to air your frustration over sceptics
This forum is for those who are curious about extraterrestrials and for those few people who have had experiences they wish to share about extraterrestrials.
Originally posted by Durden
Tell us sleeper, what is your interpretation of the motto of said forum?
IMHO, the context in which this thread is posted is quite ironic, if anything. And to add my own view in this case; the idea of blindly accepting fantastic claims - discounting a healthy amount of careful scrutiny - is what paves the way for dime-a-dozen hoaxers trolling the UFO-community and forums such as this one. Ending up diluting whatever truth there is with a seemingly endless amount of bs.
Originally posted by sleeper
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, you use the phrases "ET" and "them" often yet I seem to recall you in another thread acknowledging many different "species" here on earth. Are they all "perfect" in your eyes or just one specific "race/species"? Which "race/species" do you have experience/s with?
There are many but to put a number on them is impossible----like trying to guess how many foreign visitors from different countries are in New York City on any given day
Compared to humans they are all perfect
Originally posted by redmage
Maybe there was a misunderstanding, the question wasn't "how many species are there?". It was "Which "race/species" do you have experience/s with?" Did you really mean that you've actually had first hand experiences with more species that you could count?
You also have mentioned "renegade" species. this is why I have a problem with the "perfect" label. It's too wrapped with subjective opinion, as "perfect" (like beauty) is in the eye of the beholder. The same way sheer numbers and odds tell me that we are not alone in the universe, they also tell me that not all species could be good or "perfect".
Thanks for the response, U2U me if you'd prefer to let this thread go and I'll stop posting here to help the cause (since many can't seem to keep on topic).
Originally posted by redmage
That's a bit of a stretch Durden
Originally posted by sleeper
This is not a forum to appease non-believers
Non-believers of extraterrestrial intelligent life are a dime-a-dozen..
This forum is for those who are curious about extraterrestrials and for those few people who have had experiences they wish to share about extraterrestrials.
Nothing special about being part of the “dime-a-dozen” crowd of non-believers
Originally posted by Durden
Originally posted by redmage
That's a bit of a stretch Durden
Is it really..?
Originally posted by Durden
Well, why don't you have a look at the actual topic of the thread as well as the content of its initial post, starting something like this:
Originally posted by sleeper
This is not a forum to appease non-believers
Originally posted by sleeper
This forum is for those who are curious about extraterrestrials and for those few people who have had experiences they wish to share about extraterrestrials.
Originally posted by Durden
Though sleeper might want to check with the administration of this forum as to for who it is for...
Originally posted by Durden
Also, I did add my view on the idea of not questioning that which is presented as fact.
Originally posted by Durden
IMHO, the context in which this thread is posted is quite ironic, if anything. And to add my own view in this case; the idea of blindly accepting fantastic claims - discounting a healthy amount of careful scrutiny - is what paves the way for dime-a-dozen hoaxers trolling the UFO-community and forums such as this one. Ending up diluting whatever truth there is with a seemingly endless amount of bs.
Originally posted by Durden
I also did pose a couple of questions. The thread author did however choose not to attend to this.
Originally posted by Durden
So your point for starting this particular thread is to air your frustration over sceptics - even implying to decide for which members this forum exists?
Originally posted by Durden
Tell us sleeper, what is your interpretation of the motto of said forum?
Originally posted by Durden
Originally posted by sleeper
Non-believers of extraterrestrial intelligent life are a dime-a-dozen
Your point being..?
Originally posted by Durden
And now you come running claiming that I'm hijacking the thread..?
Originally posted by redmage
Obviously sleeper is not an admin., owner, or mod so he has no control over what "This forum is for"(when we use accepted "online" definition/association) but a single thread could be considered a "forum", or discussion area, as well (if we go by the defination of, "a place for discussion") so we again get into the semantic argument of forum/board vs. thread. Way off topic, and your major harping point.
Originally posted by sleeper
When I started this thread about a month ago the skeptics freaked and pouted and threatened to hold their breath until they turned blue-----so I let it sink to the bottom of the board----I didn’t want anyone turning blue on my watch
I did not rejuvenate this thread and I will let it go back down because the tantrums are starting back up again.
Originally posted by Durden
Well, I'd say the thread author is the one responsible for making whatever topic he/she chooses clear so as to avoid any misinterpretation. I have clearly questioned the point of this thread, but evidently sleeper hasn't clarified this alleged confusion. You however come running - which is cute, I'll admit.
So as far as I know, at this point this thread still stands with its initial wording. Hence my argument could hardly be considered off topic.
Originally posted by Durden
Well, I'd say the thread author is the one responsible for making whatever topic he/she chooses clear so as to avoid any misinterpretation.
Originally posted by redmage
Obviously sleeper is not an admin., owner, or mod so he has no control over what "This forum is for"(when we use accepted "online" definition/association) but a single thread could be considered a "forum", or discussion area, as well (if we go by the defination of, "a place for discussion") so we again get into the semantic argument of forum/board vs. thread. Way off topic, and your major harping point.
Originally posted by Durden
So as far as I know, at this point this thread still stands with its initial wording.
dictionary.reference.com...
fo·rum, n.
A medium of open discussion or voicing of ideas
Originally posted by sleeper
Some of us don’t have to believe----we know-----if you can’t accept that fact-----to bad