It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Crakeur
Bill, originally, anon was writing 80% of the posts, someone else was writing 13% and a "ghost" was writing the rest. now, we have this new anon sending directly to you. Has victor weighed in on if he thinks this is a 4th writer or if this is probably one of the other 3?
Have you spoken with victor about possibly joining the discussion and answering some of the questions (and taking some of the heat off of you for a change)?
oh and anon too. it would be nice to have her post too
Originally posted by promomag
Perhaps you shouldn't have mentioned there were pictures in the first place if there isn't any.
Originally posted by Enrikez
Go Bill Go!
*Surprisingly amusing image of man working his account from mulitple computers*
You go, bro!
If you were personally in charge of disclosure, how would you do it without destabilizing tens if not hundreds of millions of people – and also the world's economy?
Originally posted by promomag
Perhaps you shouldn't have mentioned there were pictures in the first place if there isn't any.
Edit - when I say you I'm saying Serpo, and you represent Serpo
[edit on 31-1-2006 by promomag]
Originally posted by Netchicken
Can I just congratulate torbjon on an informative, thorough and relevent post above, before it gets lost in the sockpuppet gab fest.
Torbjon raised some practical and logical issues about loading the gear mentioned in the story, its well worth reading and digesting....
Originally posted by enhancedesign
Thanks for your work and effort in illustrating your use of standard commercial pallets.
For aircraft transportation, the military uses the 463L pallet which is 88" x 108" and can handle 10,000 lbs on each pallet - well above the 5,000 lbs needed for 16 pallets.
Originally posted by Centrist
Are we dismissing these last two statements too quickly? Are we all so fearful that what we've learned is true that we MUST dismiss it in order to retain our sense of balance in the universe (and by balance, I truly mean superiority).
Originally posted by Crakeur
I wonder if anon is posting........and laughing her arse off.
During the 1960's, balsa was used extensively for the insulation of LNG carriers; some of them are still in use after more than 30 years. Again, the use of balsa was made possible by the close technical cooperation between the company and the various engineering companies working with shipyards all over the world.
During the same time period, the company, working together with the US Air Force and Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, developed the famous air cargo pallet for the 463-L cargo system of the United States Air Force, still widely used today. This aluminum-faced pallet, measuring 88" by 108", with 2" thick end-grain balsa, is rated at 10,000 lb. and an 8g dynamic load.
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
Originally posted by Netchicken
Can I just congratulate torbjon on an informative, thorough and relevent post above, before it gets lost in the sockpuppet gab fest.
Torbjon raised some practical and logical issues about loading the gear mentioned in the story, its well worth reading and digesting....
to both, for a thorough report and recognition of effort!
Originally posted by enhancedesign
Thanks for your work and effort in illustrating your use of standard commercial pallets.
For aircraft transportation, the military uses the 463L pallet which is 88" x 108" and can handle 10,000 lbs on each pallet - well above the 5,000 lbs needed for 16 pallets.
TODAY! ... now, please find appropriate data, consistent with the timeframe concerned, for relevence.
Much appreciated.
Originally posted by rdube02
I think people might have disregarded this statement by Centrist without really thinking much about it... Consider what our world would be like if we were no longer the superior beings. If we were "demoted" down to 2nd place... Would you really be okay with that? Maybe that's the question we're all being asked right now....
Originally posted by rdube02
Originally posted by Centrist
Are we dismissing these last two statements too quickly? Are we all so fearful that what we've learned is true that we MUST dismiss it in order to retain our sense of balance in the universe (and by balance, I truly mean superiority).
I think people might have disregarded this statement by Centrist without really thinking much about it... Consider what our world would be like if we were no longer the superior beings. If we were "demoted" down to 2nd place... Would you really be okay with that? Maybe that's the question we're all being asked right now....
-rdube02