It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
I just don't see it that way.
Isn't that using an incredibly broad definition, white, and one which would not apply to the law at all?
I'd be interested to hear about the first "terrorism" charge levied upon a jaywalker.
Originally posted by white4life420
Originally posted by Faust
Point being that you conspiracy wackos are always WRONG in the end.
Correct. Anyone who believed Hitler had bad intentions when stripping away German's freedoms to provide security from the communist's was a wacko. History certainly shows that.
Originally posted by Faust
I'm not saying that you're comparing Bush to Hitler. Or maybe you are, i don't know. Then again, Kanye West, who is known for his superior intellect about politics and expertise on who is and isn't a racist even without meeting them did say Bush didn't like black people AND neither did Hitler....hmmm. My GOD, it's all obvious now.
Anyway, i'll try and steer straight here. Involving our freedoms, you're refering to the Patriot Act, correct? It's been just under 5 years since it was implemented. What freedoms have you lost since then?
Originally posted by Faust
Actually, there isn't concrete evidence proving there to be 4 shots fired. However, there is concrete evidence that the third shot fired is actually an echo of the second shot that was recorded. Thus making it only 3 shots which makes it very possible for Oswald to pull off. And no, i'm not providing "links" to prove it. Find it yourself.
“The reason I knew that Oswald could not have done it, was because I could not have done it,” said former US Marine sniper, Craig Roberts. Credited with numerous kills while serving in Vietnam , Roberts turned an objective eye on the shot heard ‘round the world. After he visited Dealey Plaza, after viewing the so-called “sniper’s lair,” on the sixth floor of the book depository, and after staring at the large oak tree overspreading much of Elm Street, Roberts said, “I walked away from the window in disgust. I had seen all I needed to know that Oswald could not have been the lone shooter.”
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
Actually, the JFK Conspiracies is pretty much what this topic is about.
Shot 4: Strikes Kennedy in the back. According to surgeons after the autopsy, it did not enter deeply.
Shot 5: Hit Kennedy in the throat from the front. For shots 4 and 5 to have been by the same bullet, Oswald would have had to have been standing on the ground. Otherwise the projectory is impossible for one bullet.
“Let me tell you what we did at Quantico,” Hathcock recalls. “We reconstructed the whole thing: the angle, the range, the moving target, the time limit, the obstacles, everything. I don’t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn’t duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did. Now if I can’t do it, how in the world could a guy who was a non-qual on the rifle range and later only qualified 'marksman' do it?”
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
If you conceded to many facts,
you would soon understand how stubborn you have been grasping to out dated reports, quasi experts & flawed eyewitness accounts, not to mention your limited understanding of physics.
You really do like to take over threads and your constant arguing & changing the focus only proves how people view things differently, despite the facts.
You repeatedly disregard 10 facts to state your claims as a fact.
you have proven you just don’t require the same evidence (look it up) that I do.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
The fact is that Jake is supported by the science.
It is up to the people advancing conspiracies to offer up proof if the evidence presented is not good enough for them.
How can seemingly intelligent people dismiss the eyewitness accounts of hearing explosives?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
There were MILES of natural gas pipes in the buildings.
There is evidence of what people THINK were explosives, but nothing that can be proven to be, without a doubt.