It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Well then, by that logic can we conclude that WTC 1 and 2 were not a controlled demolition because 80% of those buildings landed outside the footprint?
Originally posted by Boatphone
How can seemingly intelligent people think that the United States government would plan and carry out 9/11??
Originally posted by bsbray11
B) I never said those things were proof of demolition. x.x Quit putting words in my mouth.
Originally posted by bsbray11Yes, ladies and gentlemen, and this is why Building 7 came down perfectly symmetrically, right onto its footprint, streamers and all, just as a controlled demolition would.
Originally posted by bsbray11
For example, the images he just posted show the aluminum facades of the steel columns bent. They don't show buckling steel columns.
As you can see, the aluminum is by no means representative of the steel columns they cover(ed).
Howard's been pretty hypocritical, though, because while he only shows aluminum facades, he's tried to criticize others for doing the exact same thing. Yet he goes on posting the facades as if they were the actual beams anyway.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
What happens when you have a mist of jet fuel falling down an enclosed elevator shaft that ignites? you get a fuel air explosion
Ever make a spud cannon?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
How can seemingly intelligent people dismiss the eyewitness accounts of the extensive damage to the south face of WTC 7?
Originally posted by 8bitagent
the seizmologist graphs reading explosions before the collapses, etc.
"There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," Lerner-Lam tells PM. "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context."
Originally posted by Shroomery
Seriously, that's beside the point.
You don't KNOW what happend.
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Originally posted by Shroomery
Seriously, that's beside the point.
You don't KNOW what happend.
Bingo!
Finally, a point upon which we can all (most) agree.
YOU don't know, either. So, it's inaccurate to say that any of these statements are true, because when all's said and done, we just don't know.
"The government concocted the entire thing"
"The government is in on it"
"They're hiding evidence because it shows their guilt"
"The government didn't do it"
"The government might have known something was going on, but didn't stop it"
(Ok, that last one has more evidence than the other four, it seems, but you get my point)
That's why we keep asking questions.
Because we just don't know.
Originally posted by Faust
Yet, when some screaming lunatic yells something bizarre you believe THAT in a heartbeat.(and yes, i do literally mean "SCREAMING LUNATIC", as in literally "screaming" and COMPLETELY disconnected with reality, which would seem you people are heading to).
Originally posted by Faust
I seriously wonder what kind of paranoid dillusional lives some of you people live.