It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shots
Can we get back on topic.
Sheehan has been reported to be leaving Texas to go and be at her mothers bedside. Apparently the stress of this all has even affected her. She is reported to have had a heart attack.
'Peace Mom' Leaves Camp, Her Mother Ill
First her husband divorces her and now her mother has a heart attack. I hope she is happy now.
[edit on 8/18/2005 by shots]
Originally posted by shots
First her husband divorces her and now her mother has a heart attack. I hope she is happy now.
Originally posted by Valhall
STROKE!...not heart attack. Though strokes are usually brought on by a fluctuation in blood pressure, that can be a spike or a drop...so are you telling me you know for certain that this stroke was caused by a b.p. spike induced by Sheehan-the-omnipotent? Furthermore, even though it usually (I said usually not always) is caused by some type of b.p. variation that can cause a chunk of plaque to come free and blow a vessel in your head - it still must have the prerequisite condition of plaque build up in the arteries. Are you now saying Sheehan-devil-woman-of-mighty-power also caused years of plaque build up in her mother's body?
You people need to get outside and breathe some fresh air - your brains are in vapor-lock.
[edit on 8-18-2005 by Valhall]
Originally posted by djohnsto77
her left-wing jihad against the President that probably has her son rolling in his grave so fast he's drilled half-way to China...when is this insanity going to stop?
AMY GOODMAN: Cindy, what were your feelings when your son Casey went to Iraq? Are they the same as now? And what were Casey's feelings about the invasion and occupation?
CINDY SHEEHAN: Right. Our family was against it from the beginning. Casey was against it, but he felt it was his duty to go because he was in the Army. And he felt that he had to go to protect his buddies, to be there for his buddies, to be support, and they are brainwashed into thinking that even if they don't agree with the mission, they're brainwashed into just blindly following it. I begged Casey not to go. I told him I would take him to Canada. I told him I would run over him with a car, anything to get him not to go to that immoral war. And he said, “Mom, I wish I didn't have to, but I have to go.”
www.democracynow.org.../06/29/1434216
Originally posted by djohnsto77
This is interesting...according to an interview transcript Sheehan said she would have rather run over her son with a car than have him go to war:
CINDY SHEEHAN: Right. Our family was against it from the beginning. Casey was against it, but he felt it was his duty to go because he was in the Army.
Current war-protesters have all the intellectual prowess of a bird flying north for the winter and their moronic fumbling illustrates how they just don’t make anti-war activists like they used to. Rallying behind Cindy Sheehan as the face of today’s anti-war movement demonstrates a myopic strategy of cataclysmic proportions. Lesson one when choosing a figurehead for any cause is first to ensure that she’s not currently engaged in a separate and easily defined act of perfidy against a professed loved one – in this case, her killed son on whose behalf she supposedly speaks. In short, she’s using her son’s death to advance the very cause against which he stood. Casey Sheehan re-enlisted five months into the Iraqi War and eventually chose to participate in the very battle that would take his irreplaceable life because he believed in the effort. It would have been equally disrespectful for her to use him as a prop to support the war had he died on the battlefield not believing in the effort. It’s not so much a question of “pro-war vs. anti-war” as it is a question of whether or not anyone has the moral right to defile a son’s legacy by using his name in opposition to that legacy – whatever it might be. To the anti-war movement I would advise the following, choose another leader, this lady just makes you want to take a shower.
Cindy Sheehan Desecrates Her Son’s Grave
Originally posted by djohnsto77
This is interesting...according to an interview transcript Sheehan said she would have rather run over her son with a car than have him go to war:
Originally posted by Odium
, I'd suggest you pick up these books as we will just be going around in circles otherwise.
Originally posted by Odium
I'm sorry, but the picture you attempt to paint of Israel is vastly wrong. Levi/Irgun broke it first not the Arabic Nations, not Palestine, not Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.
The Palestinian tragedy is primarily self-inflicted, a direct result of the vehement Palestinian Arab rejection of the United Nations resolution of November 29, 1947 calling for the establishment of two states in Palestine, and the violent attempt by the Arab nations of the region to abort the Jewish state at birth. Palestinian Arabs have tried to rewrite the history of the 1948 war in a manner that stains Israel politically and morally. Their objective is to 1) extract from Israel a confession of the allegedly forcible dispossession of "native Palestinians" by "an act of expulsion," and then 2) to ensure the return of refugees to parts of the territory that is now Israel and/or to compensate the Palestinian Arabs monetarily for their sufferings.
But this cannot actually happen, however fervently Arabs may believe in it, because historical fact is not what they claim. Arabs left Israel in 1948 in large numbers, it is true, but not for the reasons that Palestinian Arabs put forth. Fortunately for history, during the past decade Israeli and other state archives have declassified millions of records, including invaluable contemporary Arab and Palestinian documents, relating to the 1948 war and the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem. These make it possible to establish the truth about what happened in Palestine.