It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SKUNK2
I'll tell you what i mean!!
There isn't enough crew, for 2 simple reasons!
How do you protect the tank if it's broken down or you are a sleep.
lso what if the auto loader fails in the turret??
Russian armour fails against Dorchester armour. Dorchester provides the best protection against every thing besides big EFP's and bombs.
The 135mm gun also fails on the T-95, the only reason for having this calibre is for the ability to fire missiles.
Who ever said Konakt5 stops KE can go back to cloud cookoo land because thats the biggest load of BS i have ever heard. You need solid ceramic composite to stop a KE round.
According to reports there were 5 K5 equipped tanks at baghad airport which engaged the charging cav units - and to the horror of the american tankers- these very same T-72`s (they had been blowing up for weeks) actually bounced DU shots.
ok they were then killed after taking more hits - but they fired back (and hit)
K5 is underated
and the Leo2 achieves better penertration than the M1 with tungsten ammo not du load
harlequin
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The effectiveness of Kontakt-5 ERA was confirmed by tests run by the German Bundeswehr and the US Army. The Germans confirmed that in tests, the K-5, mounted on older T-72 tanks, 'shattered' their 120mm DM-53 penetrators, and in the US, Jane's IDR's Pentagon correspondent Leland Ness confirmed that "When fitted to T-72 tanks, the 'heavy' ERA made them immune to the DU penetrators of M829 APFSDS, fired by the 120 mm guns of the US M1 Abrams tanks, which were among the most formidable tank gun projectiles at the time."
Newer KE penetrators like the US M829A2 and now M829A3, have been improved to defeat the armor design of Kontakt-5 (although Kontakt-5 has been improved as well; see T-84 and T-90) . The M829A2 was the immediate response, developed in part to take on the new armor bricks. The M829A3 is a further improvement of this as well and designed to fight future armor protection methods. As a response to M829A3 russian army produced new type of ERA, Relikt, most modern russian ERA, which is claimed to be twice as effective as Kontakt-5.
en.wikipedia.org...
Jane's International Defence Review 7/1997, pg. 15:
EDIT : Since the poster below is already including this quote...
russianarmor.info...
Originally posted by SKUNK2
Don't tell me to shut up.
It's obvious you've never been in the military, let alone a bloody tank.
Also don't pretend to know what your on about because you'll get caught out like you have done.
A DU round doesn't need to do any thing but hit it's target, on impact the DU gets turned into plasma and simply pushes through the armour, the only effective countermeasure is ceramic armour, or not to get hit at all.
But of course arm chair generals like you know this, don't you *sarcasm
Originally posted by SKUNK2
reply to post by James R. Hawkwood
I'll tell you what i mean!!
There isn't enough crew, for 2 simple reasons! How do you protect the tank if it's broken down or you are a sleep.
Also what if the auto loader fails in the turret??
Russian armour fails against Dorchester armour. Dorchester provides the best protection against every thing besides big EFP's and bombs.
The 135mm gun also fails on the T-95, the only reason for having this calibre is for the ability to fire missiles.
Who ever said Konakt5 stops KE can go back to cloud cookoo land because thats the biggest load of BS i have ever heard. You need solid ceramic composite to stop a KE round.
Kontakt-5 Heavy ERA
The development of Kontakt EDZ logically led to the development of a later version, called Kontakt-5, which was optimized to be effective not only against HEAT jets, but also APFSDS long rods. It was first deployed around 1985 on the first T-80Us. It is claimed that Kontakt-5 provides about 300 mm RHA equivalent of additional protection against APFSDS rounds, which corresponds to an increase of about 160% over the base armour of the T-80U (~720 mm total).
russianarmor.info...
Jane's International Defence Review 7/1997, pg. 15:
"IMPENETRABLE RUSSIAN TANK ARMOUR STANDS UP TO EXAMINATION
"Claims that the armour of Russian tanks is effectively impenetrable, made on the basis of test carried out in Germany (see IDR 7/1996, p.15), have been supported by comments made following tests in the US.
"Speaking at a conference on Future Armoured Warfare in London in May, IDR's Pentagon correspondent Leland Ness explained that US tests involved firing trials of Russian-built T-72 tanks fitted with Kontakt-5 explosive reactive armour (ERA). In contrast to the original, or 'light', type of ERA which is effective only against shaped charge jets, the 'heavy' Kontakt-5 ERA is also effective against the long-rod penetrators of APFSDS tank gun projectiles.
"When fitted to T-72 tanks, the 'heavy' ERA made them immune to the DU penetrators of M829 APFSDS, fired by the 120 mm guns of the US M1 Abrams tanks, which are among the most formidable of current tank gun projectiles.
"Richard M. Ogorkiewicz"
russianarmor.info...
Originally posted by tomcat ha
looks like there is noone in the turret.
Looks like this will be the first next gen tank. I guess if so it will dominate untill the next gen tanks of the other tanks come out.
Iskander... What on earth are you talking about?
drugs are bad mkay
That thing should be able to take the '95 toe to toe at least.