It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rogue1Yes a few hundred grams of HE in a shped charge configuration can easily penetrate 15mm of armour, nothing new there.
In addition, thanks to their heavier (15 mm hard steel) front plate, the Kontakt-5 elements are harder to trigger by the precursor charges of tandem warheads, forcing the producers of tandem ATGMs to allocate more mass to precursor charge and, making an MBT more resistant to tandem HEAT warheads, as well.
You cannot provide any informsation whatsoever that an exploisve charge won't trigger the exploisve in the armour.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by rogue1Yes a few hundred grams of HE in a shped charge configuration can easily penetrate 15mm of armour, nothing new there.
Please refer to my source, its your amateur opinion being provide not a experts one
In addition, thanks to their heavier (15 mm hard steel) front plate, the Kontakt-5 elements are harder to trigger by the precursor charges of tandem warheads, forcing the producers of tandem ATGMs to allocate more mass to precursor charge and, making an MBT more resistant to tandem HEAT warheads, as well.
And what have you provided?. If you actually look at the kontakt-5 you will notice their is seperation between the frontal plate of steel and the explosive inside. Hence no viberation. One of its design principles was the spaced concept. eg clam shell reference
Originally posted by iskander
Further more, there are already concepts like short range rocket propelled flare dispensers to be used in conjunction with smoke dispensers to completely spoof IR fire and forget ATGMs.
Longbow Hellfire incorporates a millimeter wave radar seeker on a Hellfire II aft section data bus. The primary advantages of the Longbow missile include adverse weather capability (rain, snow, fog, smoke, and battlefield obscurants); millimeter wave countermeasures survivability; fire-and-forget guidance, which allows the Apache Longbow to launch and then remask, thus minimizing exposure to enemy fire; ; centuryrequirements. and reprogrammability to adapt to changing threats and mission an advanced warhead capable of defeating reactive armor configurations projected into the 21st century
The larger 100 mm precursor charge has a molybdenum liner, which is initiated by a different primary charge to cater for the new Magnavox electronic safety and arming unit.
During the test at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., a U.S. Air Force F-16 flying at 20,000 feet scored a direct hit on an Armored Personnel Carrier (APC) moving at 25 mph. Using its onboard targeting pod, the F-16 laser-designated the APC and released the 500-pound LJDAM approximately four miles from the target.
Link
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Since this is relevant to the discussion I might as well add it, say, how would that ERA fare against a 500LB JDAM hitting the top of the turret?
Originally posted by rogue1
A mortar round has anywhere from over 1kg to several kg's depending on the size.
Spaced armour jut increases the distace slightly of the shaped charged detonation
As usual you provide no information about predetonation from mortar rounds, obviously you have none.
Originally posted by rogue1
LOL, well no doubt chinawhite will claim that teh Russians are developing Kontakt-6 ERA or something which will defeat a JDAM.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Let me remind you that you ahven't posted any information because you start to have a go at me. The only person your refering to is yourself which has absolutly no expertise in weaponary
Originally posted by rogue1
We have just gone over this a few post before. The precursor charge is a shaped charged which hits a target in a small laser like area with its full weight while the mortar is a area burst weapon which is neither concentrated nor heavy enough to set it off. If you bother to even read, the size of the mortar was already estabilshed
Light portable mortars are not designed for armoured targets but mainly bunkers light material
Oh ok, so now you're just talking about light mortars. If a mortar hits a tank it will more than likely set of the reactive armour, no one ever mentioned destroying the tank through penetration. Typical tactic of yours, completely misrepresent what people say.
Spaced armour jut increases the distace slightly of the shaped charged detonation
Are you somehow unable to read?
You claimed that the sheer viberation fo the blast will set off the explosive while i said there is a space between the explosives and the armour so it would vibrate. Simply enough?. Need i explain more about what you said yourself????[/quote]
I can read quite well, it seems you can't even read what you write. You said that the hollow space would stop any vibration which is completely wrong Why don't you reread your previous post. HE is set off by shock, simple as that, a hollow space does not prevent that.
Wheres your sources??. I have provided information about the kontakt-5 and im not claiming about the detonation of a mortar round, YOU ARE
Hmm you said it is impervious to mortar rounds, I'm saying it is not. Is that simple enough for you. You're the one who made the orginal statement, but I hvae yet to see yourself back up anything you say. You put in quotes from various articles, not really understanding the context of them. It's kind of obvious. Like I said ou just regurgitate, you don't understand.
Find me ONE reliable articel saying this armour will not detonate from a hit by a mortar ? Comeon, you made the claim, back it up.
I beg to differ rogue knows quite a bit about weaponsry.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Let me remind you that you ahven't posted any information because you start to have a go at me. The only person your refering to is yourself which has absolutly no expertise in weaponary
next you'll tell me ERA can somehow distinguish between differnet types of explosions . the heat,pressure,blast, and fragmentation wills set it off. Even if it doesn't detonate it would destroy the ERA. another one of your fantasies of how the Kontak 5 is somehow invulnerable to mortar rounds. Why are you talking about light mortar rounds, seems you'll do anything to dodge the isssue and lead the topic astray for your antics.
Oh please,
We have just gone over this a few post before. The precursor charge is a shaped charged which hits a target in a small laser like area with its full weight while the mortar is a area burst weapon which is neither concentrated nor heavy enough to set it off. If you bother to even read, the size of the mortar was already estabilshed
Are you sure you understand how things work here.
Are you somehow unable to read?
You obviosly don't know what you're talking about. Did you even consider heat,pressure,blast or fragmentation???? A mortar round sure brings more blast and power to the table than a precursor charge.
You claimed that the sheer viberation fo the blast will set off the explosive while i said there is a space between the explosives and the armour so it would vibrate. Simply enough?. Need i explain more about what you said yourself????
Essentially all anti-tank munitions work by piercing the armor and killing the crew inside. Reactive armor can be defeated with multiple hits in the same place, as by tandem-charge weapons, which fire two or more shaped charges in rapid succession. Lacking these weapons, emulating this effect is difficult as it requires either precision artillery, luck, or close-quarter use of shoulder-launched anti-tank weapons.
pretty weak there don't you think?
Or your providing an amateur opinion about shoe making LOL
Originally posted by rogue1
The only person your refering to is yourself which has absolutly no expertise in weaponary
Originally posted by rogue1Oh ok, so now you're just talking about light mortars.
Why don't you reread your previous post. HE is set off by shock, simple as that, a hollow space does not prevent that.
Hmm you said it is impervious to mortar rounds
Find me ONE reliable articel saying this armour will not detonate from a hit by a mortar ?
Originally posted by urmomma158
I beg to differ rogue knows quite a bit about weaponsry.
Why are you talking about light mortar rounds, seems you'll do anything to dodge the isssue and lead the topic astray for your antics.
A mortar round sure brings more blast and power to the table than a precursor charge.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Why are you talking about light mortar rounds, seems you'll do anything to dodge the isssue and lead the topic astray for your antics.
If you and rogue1 (assuming your different people) pay attention to a thread and the topic, you would have known i responed to someone who said 81mm rounds specifically and did not refer to 61mm or 120mm or 300mm he said 81mm rounds. Thats why i am talking about them
A mortar round sure brings more blast and power to the table than a precursor charge.
Be my guest, provide something that supports yourself
Originally posted by chinawhite
Why don't you reread your previous post. HE is set off by shock, simple as that, a hollow space does not prevent that.
And where is this shock going to come from?. We are talking about 15mm of hardened steel it has to get though. Even though ERA has been used in battle and one RPG round does not set off all of the ERA on the tank which you are claiming. Could you please provide something which says it will work on a ERA though metal because it just leaves you and nothing else left to claim it on
Hmm you said it is impervious to mortar rounds
The original claim was it will set off all the ERA on the tank. No brainer it was you who didn't understand what people were writing. NOw what did i claim?
I did not make the claim originally, you put those words in my mouth and then went on to say that. The burden of proof lies on you since you were the first to claim such
Now, you find me ONE reliable article saying that this armour WILL detonate from a hit by a 81mm mortar
Originally posted by rogue1
You think 15mm of steel will will stop the shock from HE.
You claimed that a mortar round would not set off the ERA
You have put up a feeble attmept at a smoke screen, but nothing you have provided proves what you're claiming.
Originally posted by rogue1
Yah and ....... 81 mm mortar rounds have more than enough power to set off ERA. WHat's your point ?
How about simple facts as stated previously, a precursor charge is arounf 100g's of HE an 81mm mortar round carries around 1.7kg of HE.
Originally posted by rogue1
I rely on logic and physics
yes and im sure you can provide something stating it's not possible for an 81mm or larger mortar to set off or at least destroy the ERA
Originally posted by chinawhite
Are you another one of his accounts?. He likes to praise his own posts with mutiple accounts
Well 81mm rounds aren't the only morthar rounds going to be fired at a tank
If you and rogue1 (assuming your different people) pay attention to a thread and the topic, you would have known i responed to someone who said 81mm rounds specifically and did not refer to 61mm or 120mm or 300mm he said 81mm rounds. Thats why i am talking about them
Be my guest, provide something that supports yourself
The AGM-114F is basically an AGM-114B/C missile with a forward warhead module inserted between the existing SAL seeker section and main warhead. This additional module contains a small precursor explosive charge and a detonation delay spool. This modification has increased the missile's length to 1.8 m and launch weight to 48.6 kg. This version has a minimum range of 1.5 km and a maximum range of 8 km.
The AGM-114K Hellfire 2 is a totally redesigned missile and although it is identical in appearance to the basic AGM-114A, most of the internal components apart from the main warhead, and propulsion and control units have been changed. The new glass-domed section contains an improved semi-active laser seeker, digital autopilot and guidance electronics, precursor warhead with initiating charge, attitude gyros and power supply. The original guidance section has been replaced with a new unit called the control interface group and contains an electronic safe and arm unit, thermal battery and toroidal pneumatic accumulator. AGM-114K is 1.63 m long, has a body diameter of 178 mm, a wing span of 0.33 m and a launch weight of 45.7 kg. It is fitted with an improved tandem warhead in order to defeat explosive reactive armour. The larger 100 mm precursor charge has a molybdenum liner, which is initiated by a different primary charge to cater for the new Magnavox electronic safety and arming unit. The updated SAL seeker has been hardened against electro-optical countermeasures (EOCM) and has improved target discrimination tracking the target rather than backscatter from dust and water vapour. The digital autopilot, based on an Intel microprocessor, provides more accurate control during short-range engagements, and permits trajectory shaping allowing Hellfire 2 to fly beneath cloud cover so that its seeker does not lose target lock on. It also ensures that the terminal phase, dive trajectory remains constant at the optimum angle, regardless of range. It is reported that Hellfire 2 can engage targets between 0.5 and 9 km. The second AGM-114K Hellfire 2 missile version has a 12.5 kg HE blast/fragmentation warhead for use against ship targets and this increases the missile weight to 47.9 kg.