Salvatore Pais confirms science in MH370 videos are real during live stream

a reply to: Lazy88

What is your obsession with that man? I dont care about that a**hole

originally posted by: b0kal0ka

Just look up the Corridor Crew's remake attempt to see how bad they did.

Got a link to the remake attempt?

originally posted by: b0kal0ka
a reply to: Lazy88

What is your obsession with that man? I dont care about that a**hole

You’re the ones claiming the videos are real and using his arguments?

How’s that blatantly false argument of yours going?


Unfortunately. I asked you first about the contrails rendered to look like contrails you keep trying to con and hoax people by falsely arguing they are smoke from a cargo fire from a sealed / pressurised fuselage where the fire doesn’t show up on supposed thermal imaging.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

You never did answer to this?

b0kal0ka
a reply to: Lazy88

the clouds are not static man. again, show me some actual satellite footage from that distance then for us to see how fast the clouds should move.

Why doesn’t that show up in my gif. Hmmm



Can you get the same result right from the video without relying on x.

😂😂😂😂😂

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: b0kal0ka

Just look up the Corridor Crew's remake attempt to see how bad they did.

Got a link to the remake attempt?

It's literally in that last post. You really don't bother reading anything do you? Look at the 7 minute mark in that video. And then check out the other video I posted where they "debunk" the Gimbal video too.

I asked you first about the contrails rendered to look like contrails you keep trying to con and hoax people by falsely arguing they are smoke from a cargo fire from a sealed / pressurised fuselage where the fire doesn’t show up on supposed thermal imaging.

Who am I conning and hoaxing exactly? If you were so concerned about that, you'd stop driving so much traffic on my threads to draw more eyes on them.

Can you get the same result right from the video without relying on x.

Yup, download the video, extract the frames individually, and compare the clouds at 0:48 through 0:58. you will literally see the clouds have morphed slightly.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

just to clarify Corridor crew make no claims of that being there own work, there are stamps on the video of the people who created those effects

originally posted by: UpIsNowDown2
a reply to: b0kal0ka

just to clarify Corridor crew make no claims of that being there own work, there are stamps on the video of the people who created those effects

You got to it first.

originally posted by: b0kal0ka


Who am I conning and hoaxing exactly? If you were so concerned about that, you'd stop driving so much traffic on my threads to draw more eyes on them.

You tried to claim the contrails rendered to look like contrails from the engines was a cargo fire. A blatantly false argument on your part.

originally posted by: b0kal0ka


Yup, download the video, extract the frames individually, and compare the clouds at 0:48 through 0:58. you will literally see the clouds have morphed slightly.

And yet. I show right from the video the sky is static.




b0kal0ka, your track record is poor with it proven you use false arguments.

originally posted by: b0kal0ka

Just look up the Corridor Crew's remake attempt to see how bad they did.

So a false argument by you.

Or you got a link?

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: b0kal0ka


Who am I conning and hoaxing exactly? If you were so concerned about that, you'd stop driving so much traffic on my threads to draw more eyes on them.

You tried to claim the contrails rendered to look like contrails from the engines was a cargo fire. A blatantly false argument on your part.

Are you denying the plane was not loaded up with 500 lbs of LiOn batteries? Are you claiming there's no issue with having that amount of batteries on a plane?

originally posted by: b0kal0ka

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: b0kal0ka


Who am I conning and hoaxing exactly? If you were so concerned about that, you'd stop driving so much traffic on my threads to draw more eyes on them.

You tried to claim the contrails rendered to look like contrails from the engines was a cargo fire. A blatantly false argument on your part.

Are you denying the plane was not loaded up with 500 lbs of LiOn batteries? Are you claiming there's no issue with having that amount of batteries on a plane?

Not in this supposed thermal where the contrails are rendered to look like contrails.

a reply to: Lazy88

Plane's altitude is low based on how close they are to the cumulus cloud (1k-5k feet) - contrails only form above 30,000 feet.

Also, the MQ-1C Gray Eagle is a medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) UAV that has max altitude of 30,000 feet.

originally posted by: b0kal0ka
a reply to: Lazy88

Plane's altitude is low based on how close they are to the cumulus cloud (1k-5k feet) - contrails only form above 30,000 feet.

Also, the MQ-1C Gray Eagle is a medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) UAV that has max altitude of 30,000 feet.

You’re the one trying to use a known a proven hoax video to justify something. It’s a pretty ignorant argument on your part.


The trails are clearly rendered to be contrails.

a reply to: Lazy88

The topic begins with "Salvatore Pais confirms science"
Salvatore Pais is known for his atomic theories.

I wouldn't be surprised if there is a video where he is trying to make some kind of abstract "Promethian" connection.
There have been several Prometheus Nuclear Systems for satellites proposed.

Very difficult to cool anything in space so an engine design might involve something like an streaming ion reactor produced by magnetic containment that would leave a relatively warm debris trail.

a reply to: Lazy88

I'm not worried. The plane will never be found and we will continue to hear more and more about how this technology exists and has been suppressed for the last 80 years.

I appreciate all your engagement with me Lazy88 as you've helped drive lots of traffic to this thread. I know you will eventually come around as well, and when you do, we can work together on pushing this through to the masses. These videos will change the course of humanity forever.

a reply to: b0kal0ka

You think a passenger that broke apart and is washing up here and there was abducted while it had a serious and uncontrollable cargo fire. Placing your supposed exotic tech in danger. And you try to justify that by misrepresenting a hoax video? With no explanation what and how such technology can be used and powered.

Ok? You go.

Anyway..

MH370 contrails possibly spotted by Satellite over Indian Ocean before crash

theaviationist.com...

a reply to: Lazy88

All good brother. If you know the plane broke apart, then let the authorities know where because they still haven't found the plane and are still searching.

New search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 could begin within weeks

My point about the cargo fire was that it was part of the operation in order to get the plane to get off course.

And is that source supposed to disprove me or something? The plane was obviously above 30,000 feet at some point. Or do you think it's still flying around in the air?

originally posted by: b0kal0ka

If you know the plane broke apart,

You’re the one that posted pictures of parts from a crashed passenger jet. Not me.

originally posted by: b0kal0ka
My point about the cargo fire was that it was part of the operation in order to get the plane to get off course.

If you plan to snag a jet mid air. You don’t do it with a n uncontrollable lithium battery fire.

Where you have use a blatantly false argument concerning rendered contrails from a hoax video.

originally posted by: b0kal0ka
And is that source supposed to disprove me or something? The plane was obviously above 30,000 feet at some point. Or do you think it's still flying around in the air?

You’re the one trying to use a hoax video. Not me.

a reply to: Lazy88

The theory that five tons of Garcinia mangostana fruit and 221 kg's of lithium batteries reacted to cause the fire isn't my favorite either. Really not worth investing the cookie load to see whats down that rabbit hole.