President-Elect TRUMP Picks Former Florida A.G. PAM BONDI to be U.S. Attorney General.

Trump's picks are definitely looking swampy, again.

But don't worry. It's 10D chess !

a reply to: cherokeetroy

She might become The "Sturgeon General" 🤣

a reply to: cherokeetroy

I don't think the USA needs a Surgeon General. Anyone know the name of Biden's Surgeon General?

Trump's Surgeon General was a Black guy who predicted massive Covid-19 deaths in Minority Neighborhoods that never happened. I think his name was "Jerome" something. I called him "Wimp on steroids".

But like I said, the Surgeon General position can be eliminated and only the MSM and Democrats would tell us how doomed we are. Those who matter, wouldn't care.

EVEN AS MSNBC GOES DOWN THE DRAIN, they take the time and energy to slam incoming President Trump's nominees for HEALTH Agencies (HHS-CDC-FDA-SurgeonGeneral, etc..).

Source: www.msnbc.com...

A VERY GOOD SIGN INDEED! 😉

originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
Yeah, there's already laws for all that. How can you be 100% 2nd yet you want people who are not crazy to loose their rights because you don't want crazy people to have access to guns.

This makes zero sense...lol

Sorry pal, it comes with the territory. The idea is to be responsible for your own safety instead of trying to create your version of it for everyone else.

So everyone no matter what should have the right to own guns, OK...

Geezus, you took an oath same as I but now you're suddenly "enlightened" and making your own amendments to that oath??

Enlighten in what way? You want 100% the Wild West, sure I can go with that, but my point in this case is her point was very restrictive. If you want everyone no matter the age to own guns, and no matter the situation then live with those consequences.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Makes perfect sense. You said you don't want crazies getting access to guns. The way the government is going about it, people who are not crazy keep losing their rights because folks like yourself think that's an acceptable compromise.

That's what the second amendment says, "...the right of the people to bear arms." Where does it say "...but not the crazy people"? Apply your logic to the rest of the bill of rights. Do tell what other concessions you are willing to support that infringes on our rights.

...and you're still defending her. Smh.🤦

originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
a reply to: Xtrozero

Makes perfect sense. You said you don't want crazies getting access to guns. The way the government is going about it, people who are not crazy keep losing their rights because folks like yourself think that's an acceptable compromise.

That's what the second amendment says, "...the right of the people to bear arms." Where does it say "...but not the crazy people"? Apply your logic to the rest of the bill of rights. Do tell what other concessions you are willing to support that infringes on our rights.

...and you're still defending her. Smh.🤦

She will be fine and your 2nd will not be trampled on...lol

You are also adding levels to the issue at hand. How do you keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have access to them because of mental issues or age immaturity? It seems your answer is you don't, and they should be able to do whatever with guns if they choose no matter what.

I guess we will need to agree to disagree there.

Removed for a serious infraction of the T&Cs.