It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Oct 18th 2024 - Desperate Attempt by Obama Judge and Biden-Harris DOJ to Stop Candidate Trump.

page: 5
15
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: frogs453

What the heck? Why would you think Smith would send the case to the DC or U.S. Supreme courts?

I said Smith asked for it…

“In an opinion on Dec. 1, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled that Trump is not entitled to immunity. Trump appealed that decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which is scheduled to hear argument in the case on Jan. 9. But Smith came to the Supreme Court on Dec. 11, asking the justices to resolve the immunity question without waiting for the D.C. Circuit to weigh in.
www.scotusblog.com...



I remember that very episode!!

Why would somebody keep insisting it was Trump????

Hmmmm. Good exposure. ❗️



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: xuenchen

Yes March 25, 2024 as a trial date. The beginning schedule of motions, etc started way back in August of 2023. He fought all the way from that moment. And with Scotus 6 month delay, we're now here.


Is there any official links? Outlining this may be important. 🔐



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Vermilion

He was trying to actually trying to cut out what he knew would be further delay by Trump. Would have cut approx 5 months of delay. Smith never filed an appeal to either court. Trump appealed Chutkin. Then he appealed DC to SCOTUS.
edit on 19-10-2024 by frogs453 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: xuenchen

She had a nice schedule laid out. He could have proven his innocence and still been a hero before now. That would have looked so good to the public. Much better than all this delay and terror of anyone seeing anything related to his actions.


Her schedule was totally rushed and expedited.
Normal criminal trials take a couple years from start to finish.
This case has millions of documents generated.
Trump doesn’t have to prove his innocence.
That’s not how the system works.
The onus is on the government to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Chutkan, Smith, and the DC circuit ignored Trump’s presidential rights to immunity by not applying it and not even acknowledging it.
SCOTUS said so in its decision.
edit on 19-10-2024 by Vermilion because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Vermilion

He was trying to actually trying to cut out what he knew would be further delay by Trump. Would have cut approx 5 months of delay. Smith never filed an appeal to either court. Trump appealed Chutkin. Then he appealed DC to SCOTUS.


He was trying to rush the court so it could get done before the election.
I’m glad you finally admit it.

You’re mistaking “delaying a proceeding” with “defending oneself”.
Trump is due presidential absolute and presumptive immunity, just as SCOTUS ruled.
Chutkan and the DC circuit should have applied it.
If they would have done their job and applied it, Trump wouldn’t have had to go to SCOTUS.
That immunity has been there since George Washington.
Do you think Chutkan and the DC circuit didn’t know that? LoL
The delays in the case are all on the courts and DOJ.



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Vermilion

Almost like the Courts are delaying intentionally!

To keep the case "in the news" to defame and smear Trump. 🥶️



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Vermilion

Almost like the Courts are delaying intentionally!

To keep the case "in the news" to defame and smear Trump. 🥶️


The courts have all expedited this case in such an unprecedented manner in an attempt to interfere in the election.
If they would have done their job competently and lawfully, this case would be much further along.
As it stands now, it’s either going to get kicked or they’ll look at it after Trump’s last term in 2029.

Smith’s evidence drop last week is just helping the media with their part of the smear campaign of election interference and in no way part of a normal court process.



posted on Oct, 19 2024 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Vermilion

Almost like the Courts are delaying intentionally!

To keep the case "in the news" to defame and smear Trump. 🥶️


The "courts" is one of the terms that deflects away from the name of the judges who issue these corrupt rulings. The JUDGES will be held responsible for being anti-American.



posted on Oct, 20 2024 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Vermilion

Yes, I get it now.

Most...odd?

Your judicial system is a bit of a mystery to me.


I am sad to say, they have not been following the normal procedures in this manner since the late 80's that we all grew up understanding. It is why we are so peeved at the Dems and RINO's because they allow these breaches of public trust for fair and honest court proceedings.



posted on Oct, 24 2024 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: WeMustCare

The problem with the judges pushing for all the targeting on Trump are corrupted judges in the pockets of Soros, just remember Soro rules the judicial system now.

Very soon if he is not stopped with the help of the democrats, he will rule the Supreme Court.

Soros is a evil that needs to be eradicated, him and his minions.



posted on Oct, 24 2024 @ 08:58 AM
link   
Map shows how many Soros-linked prosecutors there are around the country — and how many have been removed

This is an eye opener, for democrats that do not believe the judicial system in the US is compromise by money.



A report from the group found that Soros-linked prosecutors oversee 20% of the U.S. population, including half of the country’s most populous cities, but more than 40% of all murders.

Soros poured $40 million into getting his candidates elected, many without any previous prosecutorial experience. In 10 races alone, he spent $13 million, by far the biggest spender in the race, and with some candidates constituted 90% of campaign funding. The funding was directed through affiliates, pass-through committees, and “shell corporations,” according to the report.

Now we know why Trump has become a target.Any prosecutor around the country with ties to Soros needs to be removed from their positions.

www.washingtonexaminer.com... d/

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Two of his most notable candidates are controversial Cook County State’s Attorney Kimberly Foxx, on whom he spent $2 million and who manages the second largest prosecutorial office in the country, and New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg, on whom he spent $1.1 million. Bragg recently gained the national spotlight for bringing the first criminal indictment against a former president in U.S. history.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join