It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Vermilion
"If Smith's goal was to get Trump in court, he never would have released all of that stuff."
I don't understand. Please explain?
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Vermilion
I see. You mean releasing it into the public domain?
That would never happen here.
That's just wrong.
But I don't know how it works over there.
Here, it's not in the public domain until it all comes out in open Court.
Weird.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Vermilion
Yes, I get it now.
Most...odd?
Your judicial system is a bit of a mystery to me.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Vermilion
Yes, I get it now.
Most...odd?
Your judicial system is a bit of a mystery to me.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Annee
Since you ask, the Judge would not have been as patient with him and would have sent him down until he had "purged his contempt".
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Annee
Since you ask, the Judge would not have been as patient with him and would have sent him down until he had "purged his contempt".
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Annee
Since you ask, the Judge would not have been as patient with him and would have sent him down until he had "purged his contempt".
I’m sure you have your “delicate” trials.
I personally find these Trump trials ridiculous — pointing finger directly at Trump.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Vermilion
Not confusing. Any hearing where someone slagged off the Judge, Court staff etc could result in contempt of Court.
I had a case where I got summary judgement and the guy shouted "If this is justice I'm a #ing banana."
DJ: "Usher, detain that man".
Night in the cells until he apologized.