It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

On UFO Secrecy and your right to know

page: 3
6
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2024 @ 08:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Jukiodone



conceptualisation of an electric band structure, vacuum tubes not reaching the desired frequencies


Depends on the vacuum tube and what it was tuned for, some of them are up with the class of Fabergé. The mass produced bunch for high speed switching ain't getting the cycles of todays transistor equipment.



it took them a few revisions to get to painting metal stripes seems to indicate at no point were they inspired by modern transistor design.


Nitinol is also rough as guts these days as the manufacturing process still needs a lot of fine tuning. As for getting some of the quantum effects, ground has been made.



The fact the first transistor was a rough looking manual point contact device


What do you mean by that? Where was the manual point of contact? A physical switch or an electrical gate? What makes it any different for the logic flow of today except for better reliability and faster speeds?



posted on Oct, 6 2024 @ 07:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: kwaka


What do you mean by that? Where was the manual point of contact? A physical switch or an electrical gate? What makes it any different for the logic flow of today except for better reliability and faster speeds?


First Transistor: www.computerhistory.org...
It took them a while to work out you could get the same proximity effect by just painting close together metal stripes.

If we take the modern integrated circuit as the baseline minimum of what "ET" tech might be back engineered from - the fact they approached it from an understanding of point contact electronics suggests (to me) they werent working backwards.



posted on Oct, 8 2024 @ 04:19 AM
link   
a reply to: schuyler2



So far, in the last eighty years, no one has come up with a way to establish we have the "right" to this information.


In the context of this question comes across as how does congress crack the National Security nut around the UFO / ET topic.

If the Democrat's win the election, as the national economy crashes, those deep in machine still need to maintain their lifestyle. With the government no longer able to fund their budget, the marketplace for secrets grows. Is it really people like Gerry Nadler and Adam Shift pushing for disclosure or are they claiming credit for screwing it up?

This is what happened as the USSR transitioned to Russia, the UFO / ET topic is a lot more accepted these days there. A lot of information got disclosed about the situation. Still many unknowns. Russia is more open about some kind of of bacteria / algae growing on the outside of the International space station. America is still reluctant to even talk about that as life outside of the Atmosphere is currently taboo.

If Trump gets in, economy is still in trouble. If he can hold it together, The the gradual, consistent push for more disclosure will continue, Hopefully some funding / acceptance for more open, civil reporting of anomalies going on as the next step. Better procedures to cross reference data sources that are not locked down by National Security orders.

As for what is really going on at the Moon, Mars, Saturn and beyond? 80 years ago the main front of WW2 ended, things still going on. Looking back, the militant culture and competitive advantage of this tech made is easy for the Roswell message too the media easily accepted. Shut up, reinforced by ridicule and loss of status.

80 years later and where is this competitive advantage going? Spike protein bio war, geoengineering of dissidents, lawfare against all that challenge this status quo. Where is this status quo going? It was born in war, it knows war, it is playing by the rules of war. Disobeying orders is a gray zone that can get you killed or win the war. It is a moment that gets one deep to find what they really value.

I have signed an NDA, so cannot comment on that. As for everything else, where is the harm, contract or ownership? The power of government comes from the consent of the governed. To question the UFO / ET situation is a freedom of religion. I am not saying these other worldly beings are god. I do see them as another shard or component of god. A slightly clearer picture on the exact nature of omnipresent, omnipotent and my place in it.



posted on Oct, 12 2024 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: ARM19688

They believe might is right



posted on Oct, 18 2024 @ 07:44 PM
link   
The disclosure will be a disappointment to the most if happens. Government can release more videos but ultimately, they will leave it up to us to decide. Well, I agree, that giving us more information will be the first step.








new topics

top topics
 
6
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join