It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
I agree with you 100% Claydisk but those that can't see the forest for the trees are insufferable for me and provoke me to belligerence. I guess I am too thin skinned and the more ignorant than I tends to set me off. Extreme ignorance sets me off to the extreme.
I wish more would recognize the potential in this but they don't, and probably never will until the missiles start to rain down on them.
I'm an old man and not long left in this world but I still hate that it could all some day come to destruction for nonsensical reasons.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
Western countries almost certainly would respond to Russia using nuclear weapons.
Militarily...I disagree. Economically maybe, but not militarily. NATO is not some fraternity, it's an alliance, an alliance which protects member countries from attack by non-member countries. It is not a political / ideological arm of any one country. Ukraine is not a member of NATO. NATO is not going to escalated the Russia-Ukraine conflict unless that conflict spills over into NATO member countries.
Think about it this way, a geographically distant NATO country would have major objections to their being involved in a nuclear conflict with Russia unless their sovereignty was being threatened (which is the whole purpose of NATO, nothing more).
Now, if Russia decided to nuke a NATO country as part of their response to Ukraine, then all bets are off, but that isn't the case at present.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Imhere
Really??
You don't say.
Emotions vs. logic...really? That's curious. I'd love to debate some true logic with you...IF that comment was directed at me. Candidly, I don't think you'd fare well.
originally posted by: charlest2
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
Western countries almost certainly would respond to Russia using nuclear weapons.
Militarily...I disagree. Economically maybe, but not militarily. NATO is not some fraternity, it's an alliance, an alliance which protects member countries from attack by non-member countries. It is not a political / ideological arm of any one country. Ukraine is not a member of NATO. NATO is not going to escalated the Russia-Ukraine conflict unless that conflict spills over into NATO member countries.
Think about it this way, a geographically distant NATO country would have major objections to their being involved in a nuclear conflict with Russia unless their sovereignty was being threatened (which is the whole purpose of NATO, nothing more).
Now, if Russia decided to nuke a NATO country as part of their response to Ukraine, then all bets are off, but that isn't the case at present.
This is where I have to disagree with your logic. Once upon a time, NATO was what you describe but not anymore. Once an alliance to inhibit Soviet aggression. But there is no more Soviet. It disintegrated with the end of the cold war and NATO's prime directive disintegrated with it. Now it is the military leverage to geopolitical objectives to surround and subdue Russia for global hegemony and economic exploitation. Russia is a vast untapped resource as far as western capitalists are concerned and they want to tap and exploit these resources.
You don't think what is happening here is politically and economically motivated but it is. As General Smedley Butler plainly stated, "War Is A Racket". It's the enforcement arm and means to satisfy capitalist greed and geopolitical hegemony. Every war is for profit. Every war!
NATO has morphed into a purely aggressive entity controlled and directed by the United States to facilitate the domination and destruction of the Russian Federation and will not stop until it is done. There was no logical purpose in our supporting the most corrupt nation in eastern Europe other than to confront Russia and put our combined military at Moscow's front doorstep. Ask Hunter and Joe Biden what business we had involving ourselves there. None legally, whatsoever. What was to gain by arming a non-NATO country? We had no vital interest there and Russia was not threatening any NATO affiliate nation. What did we have to gain there?
Putin only invaded because Ukraine was oppressing and killing ethnic Russians in the eastern regions. If Ukraine had not done that, he would have never intervened there.
Oh well! the truth will be told eventually. If we are not all dead first.
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: charlest2
Your government just facilitates the free market. Those are just consequence of that unchecked free market Why aren't you proud?
Fireworks exploded and Russian flags fluttered above jubilant crowds on Sunday after residents in Crimea voted overwhelmingly to secede from Ukraine and join Russia
But after the polls closed late on Sunday, crowds of ethnic Russians in the regional Crimean capital of Simferopol erupted with jubilant chants in the main square, overjoyed at the prospect of once again becoming part of Russia.