It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: xuenchen
Except it is pertinent. Harris' political acumen and intelligence is clearly miles ahead of Tulsi's considering in 6 months Harris will most likely be sitting behind Resolute and Tulsi will continue to be irrelevant.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp
Who's used the term price controls? I mean, other than fear mongering Right Wingers?
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: xuenchen
Except it is pertinent. Harris' political acumen and intelligence is clearly miles ahead of Tulsi's considering in 6 months Harris will most likely be sitting behind Resolute and Tulsi will continue to be irrelevant.
Yep, it’s crazy that anyone would ever vote for her. She failed spectacularly at the one job she was given, the border. She did absolutely nothing to fix it for 3 1/2 years and now people apparently dumber than she is want her to run the country. It’s insanity that she’s even a option. All the intelligent people in America and the Democrat Party picks this babbling brook to hold the nuclear codes. We’ve lost our minds.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: Threadbarer
She's had almost 4 years as Vice President.
Why has she done nothing up till now ? The 2nd most powerful person in the country and had all that time to bring her ideas forward and all she does is cackle like a brain dead chicken.
She's worse than useless, she's dangerous.
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
Funny thing; Fred Trump endorses Kamal H for POTUS. Maybe he's a little biased?
Trump has a long, long history of helping people in need, including paying off entire mortgages for widows. If he refused to help his nephew there's probably more to the story than ol' Fred wants us to know.
How do you feel about Kamal hiding evidence that would have exonerated a man from murder charges to gain a conviction?
People are willing to use anecdotal evidence to support their political bias while ignoring damaging factual evidence againts their Chosen One. The biggest mistake a voter can make is not learning to differentiate between the two.
originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
Funny thing; Fred Trump endorses Kamal H for POTUS. Maybe he's a little biased?
Trump has a long, long history of helping people in need, including paying off entire mortgages for widows. If he refused to help his nephew there's probably more to the story than ol' Fred wants us to know.
How do you feel about Kamal hiding evidence that would have exonerated a man from murder charges to gain a conviction?
People are willing to use anecdotal evidence to support their political bias while ignoring damaging factual evidence againts their Chosen One. The biggest mistake a voter can make is not learning to differentiate between the two.
As for Harris, the democrats will get what they deserve, either a Trump victory or a Democrat victory with half the country at war with them. I support neither.
originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: theatreboy
Yes, that is a theory. It's logical I guess, that is if one wants so badly to believe in Trump and, by your reference to the Bible, his divine mission. You believe in that do you? One of the many people who believe the Bible and at the same time believe that a bellicose and belligerent man teetering on the edge of his own psychosis's is the best tool for his Will at this time in this place?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: xuenchen
Remind me again, which one is the frontrunner for President and which one is begging at the MAGA table for scraps?
Your inane knee jerk has nothing to do with why Kamala has trouble rebutting things. She always just seems to freeze up with her obvious "how dare you" little attitude. Why is that do you suppose? 😊
“The next election won’t be decided at a Ballot Box,” an AP3 leader wrote several months ago in a private Telegram chat. “It’ll be decided at the ammo box.”
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: underpass61
“The next election won’t be decided at a Ballot Box,” an AP3 leader wrote several months ago in a private Telegram chat. “It’ll be decided at the ammo box.”
Source
Gee. I wonder why political violence is only assumed from one side.