Elon invites Kamala to X interview

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Why are you fearful of transparency?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: FlyersFan

For the same reason Trump agreed to CNN debate moderators, both of whom said he was 'Hitleresque' and bad for America.

That's not true. Neither Dana Bash nor Jake Tapper every said those things on air. You must be confusing them with JD Vance, who did say those things about Trump.

Bash called Trump “antisemitic and dangerous”
Tapper “Trump is proudly parroting the rhetoric of Adolph hitler”

Kamala, and especially her people, are deathly scared of her speaking openly without a teleprompter.

Elon is now being sued for hosting Trump.
Bad move.
The pressure is on Kamala to accept the spaces invite or everyone (those who don’t know it already) will see she’s a fraud.

a reply to: PorkChop96

Says a lot, that a self proclaimed Trump supporter will invite the opposing side to come in for an interview but those that are for equity and inclusion will deny the same....

Said the Spider to the Fly

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
So, about the only thing I can conclude from all this hiding, and the democrat public tolerating it, is that the people of the party are 'okay' with an idiot for president and are depending on their representatives and senators to push through all their crazy ideas.

More than okay.

It's preferred. That way the unelected keep their jobs and getting their agenda passed.

a reply to: burntheships

How is this any different than the way the MSM
media has spoken of/to Trump for the last 10 years?

Didn't Trump just do an interview with mainstream
left media villigers that couldn't even be decent enough
to show up on time for the guy? And didn't the monster they
portray him to be not only evade capture. But send them all
back to their huts humiliated in front of a crowd of potential
votes for democrats?

So much humor watching the democrats in total disarray and
Mr. Trump has been to busy dodging bullets and going to court
to have had a part in any of it.

They've almost completely destroyed themselves because Donald
Trump wants to kick their peice of # apple cart over.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

They know they couldn't contain their hatred long enough to have a meaningful conversation with someone that would be there to broadcast his policies and campaign.

a reply to: SourGrapes

Id say over a billion views/interactions is "knocking it out of the park!", wouldnt you?

Yep. And they heard the same old grievance-based stuff. Trump doesn't have any new material. Elon tried so hard to get Trump to say "government spending causes inflation" and "we need less tunnel regulations", but Trump couldn't hear him over his lamentation of losing Joe Biden and self adulation.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: FlyersFan

For the same reason Trump agreed to CNN debate moderators, both of whom said he was 'Hitleresque' and bad for America.

That's not true. Neither Dana Bash nor Jake Tapper every said those things on air. You must be confusing them with JD Vance, who did say those things about Trump.

Please refrain from lying.
Personally I think bans should be issued for intentional lying.
Perhaps you were just ignorant of the facts.

This place needs a “community notes”.
Hard to deny ignorance when the same accounts are constantly and intentionally posting known lies.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Multiple people just proved you wrong about the CNN moderators and their 'nazi - hitler' language about Trump. Are you going to admit you were wrong?

originally posted by: UKTruth
Personally I think bans should be issued for intentional lying.

ATS Terms and Conditions

15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal information from any member. You will not use information gathered from this website to harass, abuse or harm other people

Key phrase there is 'knowingly' post false misleading or inaccurate stuff. The people posting crap could be just willfully ignorant or stupid. Chances are they are campaigning for their cause or side ... but it's hard to prove it.

originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Multiple people just proved you wrong about the CNN moderators and their 'nazi - hitler' language about Trump. Are you going to admit you were wrong?

Multiple people have cited times when Dana Bash and Jake Tapper have reported and opined critically (gasp) on some Trump policy and other traits.

I stand corrected.

Nevertheless, Trump sycophant Elon has now had a personal one on one sit-down with Donald Trump and has kissed the ring, and nether regions, maiing his allegiance perfectly clear. There's nothing proftable in an Elon interview for Harris.

No one believes she will do it. She will not do any any interview without her puppet strings lol

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Multiple people have cited times when Dana Bash and Jake Tapper have reported and opined critically (gasp) on some Trump policy and other traits.

By calling him 'hitleresque' and 'bad for America'.

Which you said - "That's not true. Neither Dana Bash nor Jake Tapper every said those things on air."

You were wrong.

And so called journalists should just be reporting what is happening instead of campaigning for 'their side'.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
There's nothing proftable in an Elon interview for Harris.

Cuz she can't handle it. Whereas Trump went into the lions den and agreed to a CNN debate moderated by left wing press that were in the tank for Biden and whom had called him 'Hitlereque' and 'bad for America'. She can't handle what Trump handled. ANY credible interview would destroy Harris in a heartbeat.

lol.
Seriously why?
He made Donald, the guy he supposedly supports. Look really really bad.
Why would she go on that train wreck of a site, to be interviewed by a Trump sycophant?

a reply to: FlyersFan

You were wrong.

Mistaken.

I'm not mistaken that Trump bombed though. Or that Elon was an awful interviewer that couldn't not, for the life of him, guide Trump off his ego driven grievance-based drivel, and agree with him on government spending, inflation and tunnel regulations, in between his halted, "ers" and "uhms" and incomplete thoughts and sentences.

a reply to: spacedoubt

To be fair, most of the time, Trump makes himself look bad.

If she were to go on this interview, she could legitimately say that she had as many viewers/attendees as she usually lies about. If everyone that logged on for Trumps interview wanted to see this one play out.

I would assume most people would want to see this interview, regardless of their political views. Hard to not watch a train wreck live on the internet.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Uh you uh must have ub hated uh to hear um Obama uh talk.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Mistaken.

Wrong. You were boldly WRONG.

I'm not mistaken that Trump bombed though.

A billion hits. Doesn't seem that Trump bombed at all. The clips I heard were just fine.

Or that Elon was an awful interviewer ...

Couldn't have been that bad since a billion hits were made to the interview. And Musk got good questions in. And Trump got his plans and policy across.

Looks just fine.

a reply to: FlyersFan

ANY credible interview would destroy Harris in a heartbeat.

Elon can't do a credible interview.

Chalemeign Tha God can sure do an interview, though!