Walz's Stolen Valor EXPOSED

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Deflection at its finest

You know the answers you just choose to ignore them because you want Walz to be the big hero he thinks he is

It's not me, it is everyone else.

www.usatoday.com...

Walz rose to the rank of command sergeant major in the Minnesota National Guard, but because he did not complete additional course work at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy before leaving the National Guard in 2005, he retired as a master sergeant.

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

Thank you for finally agreeing that he is not the rank he claims he is. Now was that so hard?

As far as what he did not complete, why don't you go look it up.

Surely if he was only a manual and an exam away he would have finished instead of retiring and abandoning his men before deployment right?

They still promoted him and gave him that title, did they not?

did he retire as a command sergeant major as he claimed?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

it was a two year school.

To become a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) in the U.S. Army, applicants must meet several requirements, including:
Education
Applicants must be graduates of the United States Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) or currently enrolled in the program. The USASMC is a 42-week military course at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy that prepares Career Senior Enlisted Soldiers for promotion to the rank of CSM.

Don't let the facts scare you away, you are doing great in this conversation, and I think you have us all on the ropes.

Did he hold that rank and title while he was doing the course?

Conditionally until his commitment was met.

It was not.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

it was a two year school.

To become a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) in the U.S. Army, applicants must meet several requirements, including:
Education
Applicants must be graduates of the United States Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) or currently enrolled in the program. The USASMC is a 42-week military course at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy that prepares Career Senior Enlisted Soldiers for promotion to the rank of CSM.

Don't let the facts scare you away, you are doing great in this conversation, and I think you have us all on the ropes.

Did he hold that rank and title while he was doing the course?

Conditionally until his commitment was met.

It was not.

So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

originally posted by: quintessentone
So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

23 pages ... and you are still not getting it.

Spoonfeeding it to you ....

He was promoted to the rank of Command Sgt Major PROVIDING that he completed the required educational courses and that he fulfilled his extended contract.

He failed to meet the requirements therefore he was DEMOTED to Master Sgt.

He continues to claim that he retired as a Command Sgt Major ... when he did not.

That's stolen valor.

He continues to claim that he was carrying a weapon in an active combat situation .. when he did not.

That's stolen valor.

Simple. Read this and read it again and again until it sinks in.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

23 pages ... and you are still not getting it.

Spoonfeeding it to you ....

He was promoted to the rank of Command Sgt Major PROVIDING that he completed the required educational courses and that he fulfilled his extended contract.

He failed to meet the requirements therefore he was DEMOTED to Master Sgt.

He continues to claim that he retired as a Command Sgt Major ... when he did not.

That's stolen valor.

He continues to claim that he was carrying a weapon in an active combat situation .. when he did not.

That's stolen valor.

Simple. Read this and read it again and again until it sinks in.

OK, now that was funny. I don't care who you are.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

it was a two year school.

To become a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) in the U.S. Army, applicants must meet several requirements, including:
Education
Applicants must be graduates of the United States Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) or currently enrolled in the program. The USASMC is a 42-week military course at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy that prepares Career Senior Enlisted Soldiers for promotion to the rank of CSM.

Don't let the facts scare you away, you are doing great in this conversation, and I think you have us all on the ropes.

Did he hold that rank and title while he was doing the course?

Conditionally until his commitment was met.

It was not.

So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

right up until the time he didn't. the answer is an easy one, what does his DD214 say? (please note, anything other than the DD214 is noise)

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

it was a two year school.

To become a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) in the U.S. Army, applicants must meet several requirements, including:
Education
Applicants must be graduates of the United States Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) or currently enrolled in the program. The USASMC is a 42-week military course at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy that prepares Career Senior Enlisted Soldiers for promotion to the rank of CSM.

Don't let the facts scare you away, you are doing great in this conversation, and I think you have us all on the ropes.

Did he hold that rank and title while he was doing the course?

Conditionally until his commitment was met.

It was not.

So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

right up until the time he didn't. the answer is an easy one, what does his DD214 say? (please note, anything other than the DD214 is noise)

So he did not lie, he did hold that rank and title.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

it was a two year school.

To become a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) in the U.S. Army, applicants must meet several requirements, including:
Education
Applicants must be graduates of the United States Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) or currently enrolled in the program. The USASMC is a 42-week military course at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy that prepares Career Senior Enlisted Soldiers for promotion to the rank of CSM.

Don't let the facts scare you away, you are doing great in this conversation, and I think you have us all on the ropes.

Did he hold that rank and title while he was doing the course?

Conditionally until his commitment was met.

It was not.

So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

right up until the time he didn't. the answer is an easy one, what does his DD214 say? (please note, anything other than the DD214 is noise)

So he did not lie, he did hold that rank and title.

This is what a DD214 looks like.
This one is JD Vance’s.
x.com...
Notice it’s exactly how he told everyone.
Vance has nothing to hide.
Where’s Walz?
I’ll bet you a shiny Canadian nickel it shows him being an E-8.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

So what did he not complete, reading a manual and taking an exam?

it was a two year school.

To become a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) in the U.S. Army, applicants must meet several requirements, including:
Education
Applicants must be graduates of the United States Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) or currently enrolled in the program. The USASMC is a 42-week military course at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy that prepares Career Senior Enlisted Soldiers for promotion to the rank of CSM.

Don't let the facts scare you away, you are doing great in this conversation, and I think you have us all on the ropes.

Did he hold that rank and title while he was doing the course?

Conditionally until his commitment was met.

It was not.

So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

right up until the time he didn't. the answer is an easy one, what does his DD214 say? (please note, anything other than the DD214 is noise)

So he did not lie, he did hold that rank and title.

he did. I think everyone here has accepted that as fact. But, (and here is the important part you aren't mentally capable of grasping, ask your neighbors kids for help) he was stripped of that title and rank because he didn't complete the requirements to hold that rank and title, so when he retired, he did so as a master sergeant or an E8. E9 is the highest enlisted rank in the service.

but watching you argue about something you know nothing about it comical to a degree I had not yet found, so thanks very much for that.

originally posted by: quintessentone
So he did not lie, he did hold that rank and title.

It was given to him conditionally.
He did not meet the conditions.
Therefore it was taken away.
He continues to claim that he retired at that rank
He did not. He is lying. That's stolen valor.
What part of that isn't sinking into your head?

Back to the bus driver .... A person is hired to be a bus driver contingent upon him passing a course and committing to the job for two years. The person fails to do these things so he is fired. He is not a bus driver. The end.

originally posted by: network dude
but watching you argue about something you know nothing about it comical to a degree I had not yet found, so thanks very much for that.

A Canadian who has never even served in the military, (and I'd guess maybe never even have been to America?) arguing with a bunch of American Veterans about how the American military is run. Yes ... comical ... but getting very boring in it's predictability.

Bottom line ... the guy stole valor and did so in more than one way, and often.

a reply to: quintessentone

Can you please tell us when, where, and with whom, you served? Since you're here arguing with actual United States Veterans, you should be able to give us your qualifications, no?

Otherwise, you're just a twit arguing about something you know very little about. Stay in your lane, comrade!

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: quintessentone

Can you please tell us when, where, and with whom, you served? Since you're here arguing with actual United States Veterans, you should be able to give us your qualifications, no?

Otherwise, you're just a twit arguing about something you know very little about. Stay in your lane, comrade!

So Walz did hold that rank and title, so did he lie?

a reply to: quintessentone


You're service, please? Where'd you serve?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: quintessentone

Can you please tell us when, where, and with whom, you served? Since you're here arguing with actual United States Veterans, you should be able to give us your qualifications, no?

Otherwise, you're just a twit arguing about something you know very little about. Stay in your lane, comrade!

So Walz did hold that rank and title, so did he lie?

Yes, he did lie when he claimed he retired as a COMMAND SEARGENT MAJOR. Again, you may have to find some children to explain this to you. It's well beyond your ability.

a reply to: quintessentone

He never earned the rank

Your linked already prove that, and with it, you wrong.

Good job bub, you played yourself

Shameless bump.
Still waiting for an answer.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: quintessentone

Can you please tell us when, where, and with whom, you served? Since you're here arguing with actual United States Veterans, you should be able to give us your qualifications, no?

Otherwise, you're just a twit arguing about something you know very little about. Stay in your lane, comrade!

originally posted by: FlyersFan
Shameless bump.
Still waiting for an answer.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: quintessentone

Can you please tell us when, where, and with whom, you served? Since you're here arguing with actual United States Veterans, you should be able to give us your qualifications, no?

Otherwise, you're just a twit arguing about something you know very little about. Stay in your lane, comrade!

Good luck with that FF. It's been here what, 2 1/2 years or so and has yet to present a substantive post. At this point, I'm starting think it might be a rogue AI or, let's go full conspiracy here, an alien.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
So that is a 'yes' he held that rank and title.

23 pages ... and you are still not getting it.

Spoonfeeding it to you ....

He was promoted to the rank of Command Sgt Major PROVIDING that he completed the required educational courses and that he fulfilled his extended contract.

He failed to meet the requirements therefore he was DEMOTED to Master Sgt.

He continues to claim that he retired as a Command Sgt Major ... when he did not.

That's stolen valor.

He continues to claim that he was carrying a weapon in an active combat situation .. when he did not.

That's stolen valor.

Simple. Read this and read it again and again until it sinks in.

We have learned you can fix ignorant, but you can't fix stupid....

None so stupid as to be willfully ignorant just to "prove a point" that is not a proven point at all.