Republicans Thrilled Over Harris VP Pick of Walz

I know I am this guy's age and don't like to judge on immediate reactions but this doesn't resonate with me. Seems clownish and it makes Lloyd Benson, Al Gore, and Walter Mondale seem like stoic and reserved statesmen. I don't need the BS theatrics, no doubt it's the from being in sales my whole life.

x.com...

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Have you bothered to look into his voting history at all or are you just parroting what Right Wing media is telling you?

His record in the House is very centrist and he's one of the few Dems that voted to hold Holder accountable for Fast & Furious.

"Don't ever shy away from our progressive values. One person's socialism is another person's neighborliness,"

I don't need right wing media to do my thinking for me. I understand this is a foreign paradigm to you X.

Only need the words of the person themself.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

From my standpoint...

I too am thrilled that Kamala picked the worst of her options.
Although, I'm not really surprised.

She should have picked Obama.

They might actually win without cheating imo.

Dominion is their only route to victory now in my opinion.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
If Shapiro can't make a noticeable difference in Pennsylvania, why would she pick him ...

If Walz can't make a noticeable difference in MInnesota, why would she pick him ...
If you say that about Shapiro, you have to say it about Walz as well.

Walz walks a fine line between Progressive and centrist

No he doesn't. He is totally far left socialist.

He's also won the Internet over, with Twitter and Tik Tok being flooded with wholesome memes. Something in stark contrast to the memes being made about Vance.

There are plenty of memes coming out about Walz. You just aren't looking for them. But on another note ... so now we are going to decide who is a good choice for candidate based on the idiot memes that come out? Your far lefties won't fair so well if that's the case.

There's pretty much no downside to Walz.

The exact opposite is true. There is no upside to Walz. He's a stink'n mess.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

If that's what he wanted then that's his choice and he chose Harris.

So what?

It means she was hired because of her skin color and her genitals.
That makes her a DEI hire. That's what.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

It is her critics, they don't have anything else on her other than maybe her border issues, so they make fun of her smile, laugh, that she's not black enough, that she hates jews, that she's a dei hire, etc...

a reply to: FlyersFan

Or maybe it's because her resume is quite impressive? And Biden wanted to have a female VP?

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

It is her critics, they don't have anything else on her other than maybe her border issues, so they make fun of her smile, laugh, that she's not black enough, that she hates jews, that she's a dei hire, etc...

Yes, being the border Czar and never going to the border and allowing the mass migration has been an issue.

And also yes, would love to go after her policy.

Problem is, besides the border that was ascribed to her, she doesn't have any policies.

Go on, have a looK:
kamalaharris.com...

Absolutely no policy on her campaign page.

originally posted by: strongfp
Or maybe it's because her resume is quite impressive? And Biden wanted to have a female VP?

Nope. Her resume and 'abilities' were so UNIMPRESSIVE that the Democrats rejected her when she ran for POTUS. She didn't even make it to the first primaries. Her numbers were so low she had to drop out.

As for wanting to have a female VP ... again ... picking someone based on skin color or genitals makes them a DEI hire. Biden had four black women on his short list for VPOTUS. They were being picked for skin color and genitals. Left wing identity politics at work. That makes them DEI hires.

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Have you bothered to look into his voting history at all or are you just parroting what Right Wing media is telling you?

His record in the House is very centrist and he's one of the few Dems that voted to hold Holder accountable for Fast & Furious.

"Don't ever shy away from our progressive values. One person's socialism is another person's neighborliness,"

I don't need right wing media to do my thinking for me. I understand this is a foreign paradigm to you X.

Only need the words of the person themself.

It's neighborliness all right, if your neighborhood is in Havana...

In Miami, if voters were paying attention they lost the city if not the whole state...

a reply to: FlyersFan

I told you why should would pick Walz. He gives her a unified party. Shapiro causes friction due to his more Conservative policies.

Kelly was ditched because Harris wasn't happy with how he abandoned Biden and she disagreed with him on some policy matters. Shapiro couldn't guarantee Pennsylvania and Harris disagreed with him on some policy matters. Her and Walz had similar policy positions, they get along well, and he solidified a unified party.

This isn't hard to grasp why she went with him.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Clearly.

The are both communists.


We've been telling you this.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FlyersFan

I told you why should would pick Walz. He gives her a unified party. Shapiro causes friction due to his more Conservative policies.

Kelly was ditched because Harris wasn't happy with how he abandoned Biden and she disagreed with him on some policy matters. Shapiro couldn't guarantee Pennsylvania and Harris disagreed with him on some policy matters. Her and Walz had similar policy positions, they get along well, and he solidified a unified party.

This isn't hard to grasp why she went with him.

Sounds reasonable but are these your thoughts and conclusions or do we have independent citations, or is it the campaign manager's spin?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Shapiro couldn't guarantee Pennsylvania

And Walz being picked didn't change the fact that Minnesota was already (D).
So that doesn't fly.

and Harris disagreed with him on some policy matters.

ISRAEL. Walz is a practicing Jew who supports our ally Israel and who worked with the IDF. He has also made statements supporting Israel whereas Harris is a Hamas hugging mess, quoting Hamas propaganda and dis'n Israel.

This isn't hard to grasp why she went with him.

Yeah ... already stated ... both are freak'n far left socialists and she went with Walz because he's NOT A PRACTICING JEW WHO SUPPORTS ISRAEL ... she knows he would lose her Michigan and Wisconsin even though he's a better choice.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Shapiro couldn't guarantee Pennsylvania

And Walz being picked didn't change the fact that Minnesota was already (D).
So that doesn't fly.

and Harris disagreed with him on some policy matters.

ISRAEL. Walz is a practicing Jew who supports our ally Israel and who worked with the IDF. He has also made statements supporting Israel whereas Harris is a Hamas hugging mess, quoting Hamas propaganda and dis'n Israel.

This isn't hard to grasp why she went with him.

Yeah ... already stated ... both are freak'n far left socialists and she went with Walz because he's NOT A PRACTICING JEW WHO SUPPORTS ISRAEL ... she knows he would lose her Michigan and Wisconsin even though he's a better choice.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Her job was to investigate the root cause of immigration from three Central American countries. Since being given that job, immigration from those countries have dropped by 50%

a reply to: FlyersFan

Republicans shot down a border solution btw.

And harris wasn't the "border czar" her duties were to figure out a solution before the mass migrants got to the border. And she failed at that because there's no way to really deal with it.

a reply to: FlyersFan

I never said Walz gives her Minnesota. I said he gives her a coalition. Which he does. The party as a whole seems to be happy with Walz as the pick.

Shapiro's policies go beyond not wanting a ceasefire in Gaza. He also supports policies that put him at odds with the unions and teachers. Two groups that have been extremely supportive of Harris and two areas she wants to focus on.

originally posted by: Threadbarer

The simple fact is that Walz has broader appeal. She could've either selected someone that might have given her a state, with no guarantees, or someone that gives her a coalition. She chose the coalition.

Ah yes, the radical coalition. The one she has been singing about for years, until two weeks ago, now she is 180 degrees away from it. Until after the election that is.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Her job was to investigate the root cause of immigration from three Central American countries. Since being given that job, immigration from those countries have dropped by 50%

It's dropped now because after 3 1/2 years they were forced to take action or lose politicians and votes in the areas where the undocumented are being sent like Springfield Ohio, parts of Colorado, Georgia among others.

Some say the influx, is what made Florida solid red