92 Percent of Kamala Harris Staff Over Past Three Years Quit In Disgust

So 92% of Kamala Harris staff in the past three years have quit in disgust.
Ex staff say she's toxic. They say she's mean. They say she's lazy.
They say that Kamala engages in 'soul destroying criticism'.
They say that her office is not a healthy environment.

So I wonder how a President Harris would get along with a cabinet?
Maybe choose just not to bother meeting with them like Biden decided not to?
I wonder how a President Harris would get along with those on the
other side of the aisle as she tries to get her communism installed in the USA?
I'm thinking ... she won't get along well at all.
I wonder how a President Harris would get along with the half of
the country that isn't going to vote for her.

I'm thinking it could get really really ugly ... with her on the side
of dishing out the 'ugly'.

A former Kamala Harris staffer says aides have to endure 'a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism': report

Kamala Harris Staff Turnover and Dysfunctional Office

Harris’s Personnel Problem: Over 90 Percent of VP’s Staff Left in Last Three Years

BBC - Kamala Harris Surprising Rate of Staff Turnover

VP Harris rocked by staff turnover during Biden presidency, watchdog finds

92% Of Kamala Harris’ Staffers Left In Her First Three Years As VP Due To Her Laziness and Anger

Substack: VP Kamala Harris Had 92-Percent Staff Turnover During Her First Three Years

Harris Lost 92% of Her Staff in Three Years

Not a healthy environment’: Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

a reply to: FlyersFan

A link from the BBC? Can't you find a left wing outlet to use as a source?

a reply to: FlyersFan

Ohhh, that is a problem now? Why not before?

Turnover on President Trump's “A Team”

President Trump’s “A Team” turnover is 92% as of January 20, 2021

Brookings.edu

a reply to: FlyersFan

Well that's usually what happens when a clueless harpy that doesn't have any skills gets thrust into a position of power.

She tends to blame all of her massive failures on the people around her without looking at a mirror to see where the blame lies.

Wait until Trump destroys her at the debate, nobody will want to be around her for weeks.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: FlyersFan

Ohhh, that is a problem now? Why not before?

Turnover on President Trump's “A Team”

President Trump’s “A Team” turnover is 92% as of January 20, 2021

Brookings.edu

Whataboutism is a bitch.

Kind of like how Kamala is obviously a major miserable bitch to work for.

a reply to: RazorV66

No I just asked why it matters now.

a reply to: FlyersFan

Look at it this way, she created jobs.

Imagine if she could get 92% of Congress, the FBI, CIA, DHS, ATF, and the IRS to quit their jobs.

Sounds like a winning campaign promise to me.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: FlyersFan

Ohhh, that is a problem now? Why not before?

Turnover on President Trump's “A Team”

President Trump’s “A Team” turnover is 92% as of January 20, 2021

Brookings.edu

so since both were 92%, the math cancels out. So thanks to Trump, her staff turnover during her entire time as VP isn't allowed to be discussed again. Well played. Whataboutism for the win!

a reply to: network dude

Sure it is. Discuss away. I just wondered what's different now that it should be concerning. If you tell me why that number is no problem for one, but I should be worried now, then shouldn't you tell me why?

K. Harris is even much further left than Bernie Sanders.

Her actual policies are incredibly harmful to the future health of America, the economy, and every category real or imagined.

In fact, her policies being so toxic to life and to human beings are a mirror into her lifeless soul.

She's actually much more dangerous than Biden, and that's hard to imagine based on the damage he's done to the country.

It is then a foregone conclusion that she would be a horrible person to be around in any context. Like a psychic vampire sucking the positive energy out of the space around her. That describes her well, and her former staff that got out fast are attesting to that fact. (Eeeeesh). Or "Live braaaaiiins!) A real life creature from any zombie movie, return of the living dead.

a reply to: FlyersFan

This woman has really got some feathers flustered.

No two ways about it.

If in doubt just look at some of the articles being posted.

She's Turned Trump's game on its head by my guess.

The debate will give us a measure of her mettle put it that way.

As to it getting ugly, i dont think it could go any other way, to be honest.

a reply to: frogs453

Yea, sounds like her and Donald would make a great team.

originally posted by: frogs453
Ohhh, that is a problem now? Why not before?

whataboutism.
This is about Harris.

Harris has a horrible record when it comes to dealing with people.

Those who have had the misfortune of working for her say she's
toxic, lazy, angry and mean.

It looks like the lemmings are going to elect her and she'll be POTUS.

Her entitled attitude could be a problem in the White House.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66

No I just asked why it matters now.

It matters now because...does anyone watch the various news media?

Harris raises $200M, signs up 170,000 volunteers in first week of campaign

www.msn.com...
I am sure Kamala can find eager replacements with the right attitude. Then was then, now is now.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66

No I just asked why it matters now.

It matters now because...does anyone watch the various news media?

Harris raises $200M, signs up 170,000 volunteers in first week of campaign

www.msn.com...
I am sure Kamala can find eager replacements with the right attitude. Then was then, now is now.

That's what they want you to believe about a toxic, unlikable bitch like Harris.

All smoke and mirrors from the desperate Liberal clowns.

originally posted by: quintessentone
I am sure Kamala can find eager replacements with the right attitude.

Blaming the victim.

So the 92% leaving because of a toxic environment, because of Kamala being lazy and mean ... that was all the fault of the workers and they didn't have the right attitude?

Yeah .. sure ... in clown world. pffft.

a reply to: frogs453

Not only that, but why are only four members of Trump's White House staff saying they'll vote for him for another term?

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
I am sure Kamala can find eager replacements with the right attitude.

Blaming the victim.

So the 92% leaving because of a toxic environment, because of Kamala being lazy and mean ... that was all the fault of the workers and they didn't have the right attitude?

Yeah .. sure ... in clown world. pffft.

Again, she will have no problem finding eager replacements with the right attitude. No problemo.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: frogs453

Not only that, but why are only four members of Trump's White House staff saying they'll vote for him for another term?

Wow, that many, really?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
I am sure Kamala can find eager replacements with the right attitude.

Blaming the victim.

So the 92% leaving because of a toxic environment, because of Kamala being lazy and mean ... that was all the fault of the workers and they didn't have the right attitude?

Yeah .. sure ... in clown world. pffft.

Again, she will have no problem finding eager replacements with the right attitude. No problemo.

Whatever you need to believe to sleep at night.

Who's next in line after Kamala gets forced out by the desperate Dem con artists when Trump embarrasses her on the debate stage?