Is the DNC that stupid, or is there a deeper, darker agenda being carried out?

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Bush wasn't running that year, I think you meant Romney?

But yes your family is exactly who I was talking about in my post, there is a certain segment of the population who just won't vote for a demoralized ticket where the primary process was sabotaged by the very party they support.

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Bush wasn't running that year, I think you meant Romney?

But yes your family is exactly who I was talking about in my post, there is a certain segment of the population who just won't vote for a demoralized ticket where the primary process was sabotaged by the very party they support.

Yeah but are those enough to offset all the idiots who will vote for her just because she's black, the other idiots that will vote for her just because she's a woman, and still more idiots who will vote for her just because she's "young."

There were a bunch of people who didn't even vote in the primary and weren't gonna vote in November because they didn't want to vote for another old, white guy. They no longer have that problem. The polling has shown an increase in support for Harris. That's likely because of all those people coming back into the fold.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

I genuinely believe that they really are that stupid. They've spent enough time taking advantage of how stupid the average person is and have gotten so laxed because of that that they have become just as stupid.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke
a reply to: chr0naut

We tried that once. His name was RON PAUL. It was the only presidential campaign I have ever materially participated in.

Almost everyone I talked to said something like, I'd vote for him but he can't win so it'd be a thrown away vote.

Right. That's because all idiots like you say that that.

We rejected what was probably the last decent candidate to ever be on the ballot.

Frankly, we deserve what we're going to get.

:

If Ron Paul had won, he would be President. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote at all. It also may have re-shaped American politics for decades to come.

You are right! I am a big Paul supporter and he sounds like a Biblical prophet from the old days now.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

The "brothers" aren't coming back ever again. They realize what has been going on to them by the D's and elite Liberals. They know now it is Trump or bust for the people of the Black community despite the welfare moms voting straight D till hell freezes over.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33
No, I meant Bush.

He oversaw the WTC false flag and then lies to our faces about Saddam having WMDs.

I read House of Said, House of Bush.

No, I meant BUSH!

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Bush wasn't running that year, I think you meant Romney?

But yes your family is exactly who I was talking about in my post, there is a certain segment of the population who just won't vote for a demoralized ticket where the primary process was sabotaged by the very party they support.

Yeah but are those enough to offset all the idiots who will vote for her just because she's black, the other idiots that will vote for her just because she's a woman, and still more idiots who will vote for her just because she's "young."

There were a bunch of people who didn't even vote in the primary and weren't gonna vote in November because they didn't want to vote for another old, white guy. They no longer have that problem. The polling has shown an increase in support for Harris. That's likely because of all those people coming back into the fold.

Had nothing to with "old white guys." What a useless strawman!

I don't care about age or skin color. I look for qualification.

Romney didn't have it.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Well, they don’t understand economics, so they potentially could be that stupid. I do think that they have something up their sleeve as usual.

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

It's a little naïve to think that Trump is anything but a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Like you said in your OP, nothing in politics happens by accident, and Trump is no different.

originally posted by: EyeoftheHurricane
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Well, they don’t understand economics, so they potentially could be that stupid. I do think that they have something up their sleeve as usual.

Here we go, underestimating the enemy again. Bad move. REALLY BAD MOVE!

They understand economics. Socialism/Marxism/Communism (they are all the same) is an economic system as much as it is an ideology, and political paradigm and a religion. They understand this well. They know what it leads to, and this is not economic development, prosperity and abundance. The end goal of it is control.

No, they are not a bunch of low I.Q. school children playing with things they don't understand. They understand, they know what they are doing and they know where it is going.

I am astounded by the number of people contributing to this thread who just keep saying, Derr, they jus' a bunch o' dummies! That is exactly what you are supposed to think. This is why they put people like dementia addled Joe Biden and (gotta be careful and nice here) that intellectually challenged woman as their public facing representatives. Now, you think they are dumb, which mean, in your mind, you think that they do not have a long-term plan, they are weak, and easily defeated.

This video clip is about "Russians." Remember that back in the day, the Russians were the communists. Now, the communists are in the White House and the halls of power in the U.S. The same principle applies...



:

originally posted by: Fdttaut
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

It's a little naïve to think that Trump is anything but a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Like you said in your OP, nothing in politics happens by accident, and Trump is no different.

Yeah.

I keep trying to convince myself that this time maybe it ain't so. Maybe he was and is the black swan event that will upset the flow of history. But I have yet to make a solid case for that, and most of the evidence against it come from the man himself, including his part in the death jab debacle and how he keeps lauding it, his failure to do much of what he promised in terms of "draining the swamp," and his refusal to declassify certain information, namely the Kennedy assassination files.

I can hope but not snort lines of hopium. My hope is very guarded and very doubtful. I guess it can best be said that I hope to be proven wrong one day very soon, but I am not holding my breath.

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

The "brothers" aren't coming back ever again. They realize what has been going on to them by the D's and elite Liberals. They know now it is Trump or bust for the people of the Black community despite the welfare moms voting straight D till hell freezes over.

Anybody with a couple of functioning brain cells (and unfortunately that seems to not be a very large part of the voting public in the U.S.) understands that the current course of politics and the economy doesn't lay out anything good for anybody but a few wealthy power-brokers.

My whole thesis here (which so many seem to completely miss) is that those power-brokers are in control of the DNC and by extension in control of most every aspect of politics, economy and even social life in the U.S. It's not their front men (like Biden and Harris) that are running the show. These duffesses are just the public-facing theatre.

In addition, I do believe that the Uniparty is real, and most of our government officials are beholden to it, whether by ideology, money or blackmail. I suspect that the two latter hold sway.

What remains to be seen is where the critical mass of voters fall. Again, I am not hopeful because, THE STUPID, IT BURNS!

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Interesting theory, doesn't really make much sense to me though. Let me explain what I mean.

Let's rewind in our minds to 2016. HRC had been selected to win the contest, annointed by the corporate media, exonerated by the IC despite obviously mishandling lots and lots of classified information in very sketchy ways, was known to be a committed agent of NWO style globalism type government.

The full court press against DJT by the corporate media was already in full swing. We were told daily what a horrible, racist, sexist, and criminal person this candidate was, but not to worry, the polls all heavily favored HRC, he had zero chance of actually winning the presidency.

Somehow, amazingly, he won anyway. Whatever unspoken mechanism was supposed to insure HRC's victory somehow failed, or the majority for Trump was so large that she couldn't be cheated into victory. Something apparently went wrong with the control system or something. I don't know, they don't invite me to their evil cronie board meetings.

Anyhow, the point of this recap is to point out that we were a hair's breadth away from globalism full speed ahead ala HRC. Instead we got the bombastic boob who actually appears to have turned out to be a decent fellow who actually gives a damn about the nation, her people, and the world and its people, and is not a globalist.

Why bother to fake us out with a decent seeming candidate when they already had their faithful servant who was just about to step on the gas with the globalization trip? Seems silly to put someone in office who would begin to unravel their plans when those plans were so near fruition, and they had the perfect agent in the chute to make them happen. Why waste time? Why chance failure by messing around with well laid and orchestrated plans? Doesn't make much sense to me. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am.

Not stupidity then, nor a controlled opposition orange headed tanned man, in my opinion. Sheer terror and desperation at the prospect of losing control of the near fruition of the hundred year plan to control the world new world order style. Something went wrong, they're trying to claw it back, and they're still not back in control despite appearances. That's my speculative theory as to what all of the oddness in politics this last decade is.

a reply to: badcabbie

I actually addressed that in my OP, I think.

If what I hypothesise holds any water ...

Knowing what I know about D.C. and politicians, maybe he's been compromised.

Maybe he was in it all along just for the game and he's playing the side that he thinks might most benefit him at this point.

I hope that he's for real, but there are things that just make not sure.

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: EyeoftheHurricane
a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

Well, they don’t understand economics, so they potentially could be that stupid. I do think that they have something up their sleeve as usual.

Here we go, underestimating the enemy again. Bad move. REALLY BAD MOVE!

They understand economics. Socialism/Marxism/Communism (they are all the same) is an economic system as much as it is an ideology, and political paradigm and a religion. They understand this well. They know what it leads to, and this is not economic development, prosperity and abundance. The end goal of it is control.

No, they are not a bunch of low I.Q. school children playing with things they don't understand. They understand, they know what they are doing and they know where it is going.

I am astounded by the number of people contributing to this thread who just keep saying, Derr, they jus' a bunch o' dummies! That is exactly what you are supposed to think. This is why they put people like dementia addled Joe Biden and (gotta be careful and nice here) that intellectually challenged woman as their public facing representatives. Now, you think they are dumb, which mean, in your mind, you think that they do not have a long-term plan, they are weak, and easily defeated.

This video clip is about "Russians." Remember that back in the day, the Russians were the communists. Now, the communists are in the White House and the halls of power in the U.S. The same principle applies...

:

Yes I hear you. They are in the WH now. But if they really understood economics, they wouldn’t be pushing communism. But yes, there are people who manipulate the economy, but what have they done to it? So, some like Soros really know how to manipulate the economy, enough to ruin it for everyone else while they profit. This is what the international bankers did as far back as ww2. Prof Antony Sutton wrote about that.
But in general, communists do not really understand economics.
The intl banking cabal are not necessarily communist.
Sutton wrote that the Hegelians of Skull and Bones created a system which is neither right nor left.
When people say that conservatives are right wing fascists, this is not really true. President Wilson was in fact more fascist and embraced the Mussolini type totalitarianism, according to Jonah Goldberg, who write the book, “Liberal Fascism.”
So, Wilson and FDR embraced totalitarianism. They were the early Progressives and The New Deal was socialist, and so is the Green New deal, but what is the green new deal doing to our economy?

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

I have to tell you AwakenotWoke, if they were not so scared that Trump would be back to put a stop to all the things theyve been doing and want to do, they would not have pulled out all the stops with all the lawfare cases. Who do they do that to? Look how people who have gone against them have media leaks about their private lives, they are blackmailed into doing the bidding of tptb. What happened to Trump
both as President and as former President had never happened before. So, I find it silly that people are insisting that he’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing and that he must be doing things for personal profit. The whole idea that he could have pretended to be shot for some kind of photo op is equally ridiculous. Black Swan event, nope, but it could have been….
I’ve studied a lot over my lifetime…Agenda 21, Skull and Bones, CFR, G Edward Griffin, Antony Sutton on The Order, Jerome Corsi…
Here’s an interesting article by the Mises Inst. entitled, “Marx Was Not an Economist”
mises.org...

What a person deserves to earn can’t be decided by anyone—certainly not a politician or an intellectual. It is assumed that a capital owner isn’t working, but their decisions need local knowledge of time and place which cannot be formed easily. Marx only saw one side of the coin, ignoring the fact that the owner of capital has a possibility of losses too.

Incidentally, I only read that article last night for the first time.