Jewish couple was rejected as foster parents because of their religion. The future Project 2025

originally posted by: quintessentone
Trump says the truth when he says he didn't read it, ...

If he hasn't even read it, then he can't implement it.
Major 'DUH' ...

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: quintessentone

Why didn't they argue the 14th again then?

Did any dissenting opinions from The Justices say anything that you are saying?

The case is over.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The Justices are going to be tweaked by Biden, stay tuned.

Do elaborate.

I always enjoy hearing how sitting administrations try to violate separation of powers.

Again, as I have to continually repeat things here, "stay tuned".

So you don't know.

Go figure......

pssssttt it takes Congress, not just a President.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Trump says the truth when he says he didn't read it, ...

If he hasn't even read it, then he can't implement it.
Major 'DUH' ...

He does not have to read it to be told about it's contents and policies, DUH X2 - enter Vance.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: quintessentone

Why didn't they argue the 14th again then?

Did any dissenting opinions from The Justices say anything that you are saying?

The case is over.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The Justices are going to be tweaked by Biden, stay tuned.

Do elaborate.

I always enjoy hearing how sitting administrations try to violate separation of powers.

Again, as I have to continually repeat things here, "stay tuned".

So you don't know.

Go figure......

pssssttt it takes Congress, not just a President.

Which takes large amounts of political will and capital.

Something neither party can afford right now.

....and that can't be printed

Kamala hasn't read doodly squat. Please.

And the majority of my friends are left leaning while I am the polar opposite of them, so just because people are friends, doesn't mean they align about everything.

originally posted by: quintessentone
I am not a leftie

You have to be trying to convince yourself of that because there's no way you actually said that in an attempt to convince anyone else. You are the TEXTBOOK DEFINITION of a leftie. If you went any further left you'd clip through the wall and end up on the right. You've got permanent indentations on the back of your head from how hard you 'pull' for the left.

originally posted by: MrGashler

originally posted by: quintessentone
I am not a leftie

You have to be trying to convince yourself of that because there's no way you actually said that in an attempt to convince anyone else. You are the TEXTBOOK DEFINITION of a leftie. If you went any further left you'd clip through the wall and end up on the right. You've got permanent indentations on the back of your head from how hard you 'pull' for the left.

No, I am the right leaning and MAGA cult's Project 2025 textbook definition of a leftie.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: MrGashler

originally posted by: quintessentone
I am not a leftie

You have to be trying to convince yourself of that because there's no way you actually said that in an attempt to convince anyone else. You are the TEXTBOOK DEFINITION of a leftie. If you went any further left you'd clip through the wall and end up on the right. You've got permanent indentations on the back of your head from how hard you 'pull' for the left.

No, I am the right leaning and MAGA cult's Project 2025 textbook definition of a leftie.

Possible The Heritage Foundation has taken on infiltrators? Leftist infiltrators and implants took over The Cabinet Departments decades ago, so why not private foundations too.

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Dandandat3

Project 2025 didn't exist in 2021. It wasn't even published until 2023.

Trump has nothing to do with it, and hasn't supported or endorsed it in any way.

This is the Heritage Foundation's baby, that they've been nursing for decades.

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Dandandat3

I know, words and especially quotes are a difficult feat.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Is Trump lying to you, or is he just that dumb?

Dawn's Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America Kindle Edition
by Kevin Roberts (Author), J. D. Vance (Foreword)

Heritage Foundation president and Project 2025 head Kevin Roberts outlines a peaceful "Second American Revolution" for voters looking to shift the power back into the hands of the people.

For VOTERS? Who are the voters going to vote for to get the reality this book promises?



OOOOOPS! JD Vance wrote the forward to the Project 2025 book!
Trump's VP pick's all over Project 2025.

Besides, Trump catered to the Heritage Foundation's whims when he was president before, he'll do it again.

Trump Administration Embraces Heritage Foundation Policy Recommendations

Examples of some of the most notable policy recommendations and their adoption or implementation by the Trump administration include:

Leaving the Paris Climate Accord: In August 2017, Trump announced the U.S. was ending its funding and membership in the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.

Repealing Net Neutrality: In December 2017, Trump’s Federal Communications Commission chairman proposed ending the 2015 network neutrality rules.

Reshaping National Monuments: Heritage’s recommendation to prohibit Land Acquisition (Cap and Reduce the Size of the Federal Estate) was adopted by Trump when he issued two executive orders effectively shrinking the size of national monuments in Utah.

Reinstating the Mexico City Policy: This executive order prevents taxpayer money from funding international groups involved in abortion and ending funding to the United Nations Population fund. On Jan. 23, 2017, in his first pro-life action, Trump signed an executive order today reinstating the Mexico City Policy.

Increasing Military Spending: Trump’s budget calls for a $54 billion increase in military spending to improve capacity, capability, and readiness of America’s armed forces.

Reforming Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF): The Trump administration adopted and is in favor of strengthening existing work requirements in order to receive benefits.

Allowing Development of Natural Resources: The Trump administration opened off-shore drilling and on federal lands. Executive Order 13783 directed Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to commence federal land coal leasing activities.

Reforming Government Agencies: Trump tasked each of his Cabinet secretaries to prepare detailed plans on how they propose to reduce the scope and size of their respective departments while streamlining services and ensuring each department runs more efficiently and handles tax dollars appropriately.

Withdrawing from UNESCO: In October 2017, Trump announced he was putting an end to U.S. membership in the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Not to mention how he "overturned" Roe.

Ex-Trump Administration Officials Involved in Project 2025: Full List

Many contributors to the policy document, including its director, Paul Dans, one of its editors, Steven Groves, and its associate director, Spencer Chretien, all previously served in the Trump administration.

In total, 31 contrwww.newsweek.com... served at various levels in and around Trump's administration.

31 of Trump's previous staff contributed to Project 2025's agenda!

a reply to: Dandandat3

Your source is a very interesting read, indeed.

amp.theguardian.com...

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I should perhaps delve into this project 2025 thing.

If it has you this unhinged, I imagine it is somewhere near the correct course of action.

Regardless, I appreciate you posting Trumps position on it.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I should perhaps delve into this project 2025 thing.

If it has you this unhinged, I imagine it is somewhere near the correct course of action.

Regardless, I appreciate you posting Trumps position on it.

Since when does a common sense poster have to be unhinged to post the truth?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

Given your history, you don't understand what any of that means.

Facism was just exercised upon you by the democrat party choosing your candidate in case you were interested in the actual meaning of the term...

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I should perhaps delve into this project 2025 thing.

If it has you this unhinged, I imagine it is somewhere near the correct course of action.

Regardless, I appreciate you posting Trumps position on it.

Since when does a common sense poster have to be unhinged to post the truth?

Citation still required....

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

Given your history, you don't understand what any of that means.

Facism was just exercised upon you by the democrat party choosing your candidate in case you were interested in the actual meaning of the term...

Attacking the messenger is all I see you doing. Keep those blinders on because this type of rhetoric will lose votes for your party.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

Not to mention burning down the buildings along with the policies.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

Given your history, you don't understand what any of that means.

Facism was just exercised upon you by the democrat party choosing your candidate in case you were interested in the actual meaning of the term...

Attacking the messenger is all I see you doing. Keep those blinders on because this type of rhetoric will lose votes for your party.

If only you were genuinely concerned with the GOPs party or voters....

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

Given your history, you don't understand what any of that means.

Facism was just exercised upon you by the democrat party choosing your candidate in case you were interested in the actual meaning of the term...

Attacking the messenger is all I see you doing. Keep those blinders on because this type of rhetoric will lose votes for your party.

If only you were genuinely concerned with the GOPs party or voters....

I am concerned with the global economy, which affects all of us.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Hey, if you're into Cristo-fascism, this has got your name all over it!

Given your history, you don't understand what any of that means.

Facism was just exercised upon you by the democrat party choosing your candidate in case you were interested in the actual meaning of the term...

Attacking the messenger is all I see you doing. Keep those blinders on because this type of rhetoric will lose votes for your party.

If only you were genuinely concerned with the GOPs party or voters....

I am concerned with the global economy, which affects all of us.

Thats nice.

I'm concerned with the US economy.