Pelosi endorses Harris with 'immense pride,' praises Biden's 'wisdom'

originally posted by: Vermilion

Can any of the Kamala lovers here tell us why you would vote for her, without mentioning her race or gender?

That's easy for the low IQ's...

NOT TRUMP!

a reply to: Vermilion

She's a strong supporter of reproductive and labor rights and she's not a puppet of the Heritage Foundation.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

She's a strong supporter of reproductive and labor rights and she's not a puppet of the Heritage Foundation.

She's also strong on the side of women's rights and the lower and middle classes to thrive not just survive.

a reply to: Threadbarer

81 million vot....er I mean dollars in one day.


Oh, she's a puppet.


But don't let any of all these facts deter you from posting absurd, regurgitated talking points.

..it never has before.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

not a puppet of the Heritage Foundation.

You mean like Obama was?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

$81 million from 880,000 donors. That comes out to less than $100 per donor.

originally posted by: PorkChop96

You mean like Obama was?

At least Obama had knowledge of Geography.

Madame does not even, too much pot smoking.

Obama had votes and campaigned, Madame, NOT.

Backwards people, say what you want but women
are losing rights!

DNC___________________________________
sign on the dotted line.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

$81 million from 880,000 donors. That comes out to less than $100 per donor.

Not according to James O'Keefe's investigations.


Did you think we forgot how you guys work?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

You may want to revisit how his whole ACORN "expose" turned out for him.

a reply to: Threadbarer

The latest donors to be doing all the fuss is the high-end donors that were holding their wallets to see how the democrats were going to fix biden dilemma.

I guess they have been assured that Kamala will win by any means necessary and they do not need to worry about a thing.

Just like old joe with kamala it will be business as usual.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

$81 million from 880,000 donors. That comes out to less than $100 per donor.

They use some billionaires money and siphon it through npc’s.
Usually older folks on social security.
That’s how they get caught.
5,000 eighty year old grannies giving maximum donations 😆
That’s so 2010.

a reply to: Threadbarer

If only you held the same or even remotely similar scrutiny to what you regurgitate here.


O'Keefe is the least of concern where integrity is concerned.

But nice try.

originally posted by: Vermilion


They use some billionaires money and siphon it through npc’s.
Usually older folks on social security.
That’s how they get caught.

Reminds me of Correct The Record,
and currently Act Blue.

As you said, its basically like money laundering
if they do not get caught they get away with it.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Hypntick

AOC was one of the first to come out and endorse Harris.

Not at first. 😀 She waited.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

She's a strong supporter of reproductive and labor rights and she's not a puppet of the Heritage Foundation.

Yeah and with Union Membership down under The current Administration (even with all the so-called jobs created), she needs the help. Even the Teamster President said half his Members are (R)s. ☢️

originally posted by: xuenchen


Not at first. 😀 She waited.

As radical left as Madame is, she is not as radical
left as AOC would want.

Again, people pay attention.

We are going BACKWARDS now in terms of rights.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

She's a strong supporter of reproductive and labor rights and she's not a puppet of the Heritage Foundation.

She's also strong on the side of women's rights and the lower and middle classes to thrive not just survive.

Since when? She's been holding her Chuck on their necks since before she was the token VP. She was also the most unpopular candidate in the 2020 race so unless you think the left can cheat her in this time like they did Biden then she's losing in a landslide. Democrats know it.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

She's a strong supporter of reproductive and labor rights and she's not a puppet of the Heritage Foundation.

She's also strong on the side of women's rights and the lower and middle classes to thrive not just survive.

Since when? She's been holding her Chuck on their necks since before she was the token VP. She was also the most unpopular candidate in the 2020 race so unless you think the left can cheat her in this time like they did Biden then she's losing in a landslide. Democrats know it.

When it comes to women's freedoms and rights, that one issue may take her to a landslide win.

a reply to: quintessentone

Then she should be vying for governor or mayor.

As that is now a states rights issue...

a reply to: imitator


"she is the best and most qualified candidate we have."

And there it is.