It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: DBCowboy
Hmm.. you just labeled me.
I advised he just repeat his own label on his "bombshell" thread on Harris so newbies know what the real motivation is. He's the one that told all of us very proudly before.
originally posted by: frogs453
And oddly enough Trump wrote a total of 6000.00 in checks to Kamala for her campaign in CA over multiple years , so apparently many here disagree with Dear Leader on whether she was doing a good job or not at the time. His campaign now states it was "to play the game". Her opponents accused her of Trump trying to influence the investigation into the states investigation into his University. She donated the money to a civil rights non profit instead.
KBTX
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
I do not have to Prove ANYTHING to you
That's what I thought. You got nothing! Just made up misogynous BS.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Vermilion
I think she is taking a crash course in geography first.
You know, start with the basics and then expand.
Then she might be able to move onto policy,
but I wouldn't count on it. Frightening, literally
frightening.
Her aggressive questioning of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 helped solidify her credentials as one of the Democratic Partyās top rising stars.
a controversial truancy enforcement push as San Franciscoās district attorney that saw parents face penalties for their children missing school.
her office also worked to prevent the release of more prisoners, despite massive overcrowding in California prisons.
And as the stateās attorney general, Harris argued a case defending the use of the death penalty in California, despite being personally against it.
We can't say anything about Kamala or it's misogynous or Racist .
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
We can't say anything about Kamala or it's misogynous or Racist .
Anything? Don't conflate. Be respectful and follow the conversation.
So you condone/excuse women having sex with their married bosses in return for favors?
BTW...Fani Willis and Nathan Wade had a very similar situation.
That didn't work out so well for them either.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
We can't say anything about Kamala or it's misogynous or Racist .
Anything? Don't conflate. Be respectful and follow the conversation.
Conflate ? That is my objective observation Sookie .
you started in with the Misogyny and Racism immediately .
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CarlLaFong
So you condone/excuse women having sex with their married bosses in return for favors?
There you go again, putting words I never said in my mouth.
Why do support men that require women to perform sexual favors before they'll consider them for a job position?
BTW...Fani Willis and Nathan Wade had a very similar situation.
That didn't work out so well for them either.
What do you mean "either"? Why are you bringing them up, because they're black too? I don't see how one couple has anything to do with the other, otherwise.