The threat of Communism is driving support to Trump.

a reply to: grey580

I have spoken with so many Cubans that have come over from Cuba in the past 20 years that lived under Castro.And they don't think Biden is communist.

of course they don't, the Castro Regimes came in through violence and a iron fist, now whether the leadership, well i shouldn't say new they have been in power for almost 5 years now, and life in Cuba is not much better than as when the Castro's ruled.

what's happening now is a lulling the U.S.into more freedom, economic, through social outlets,DEI initiatives, economic initiatives, and legal maneuvers with legislations designed to take away more and more freedoms until there are very few if any left.

you know like a frog in a boiling pot of water, he doesn't know he's fixin to die until it's to late.

The election will be between race baiting socialist Kamala Harris ... and nationalist Donald Trump. I'll take the nationalist over the race baiting socialist. I was going to vote for the Libertarian, but the Libertarians picked someone worse than Biden/Harris and Trump ... so that's out.

a reply to: bastion

If she was an actual Marxist then she would have joined the communist party and sat around for hours on end listening to old guys fantasize about what if Trostky hadn't died and such.

When people are accused of being communists or marxists they're calling out those who have been indoctrinated into a core foundation of Marxist philosophy, that history can be summed up as oppressed and oppressor. That man kind attempts to transcend above "history" by constantly trying to write it or control it.

Now, do those who have "learned" about marxism ever go deeper into it all like I did? No, they make up whatever fits that oppressed vrs oppressor narrative and then look at how the soviet union ae to be or other violent revolutionary means and muddle up society.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Life pretty much sucks in Cuba when it comes to the government. The regular people live in fear. The army scares the crap out of the populace. There's people that live in the neighborhoods that work for the government. Anyone can go snitch to them.

what's happening now is a lulling the U.S.into more freedom

Isn't that the point of America? More freedom not less? How does giving more freedom take freedom away? Which freedoms have been taken away?

no it isn't, what's driving trumpism is the huge wealth gap, money not going as far, aging population, low birth rates, immigration, the decline of the white population due to slowed population growth which has recently become a population decline, obama becoming president and a growing presence of non-whites in political circles making Whites panic, white Latinos that use their whiteness to get into good positions without Whites noticing they aren't actually white(i'd argue the only reason florida and texas isn't blue is because this fact), right wing ideology, war weariness, significant social changes in gen z and alpha that is completely alien to older generations, Russian influence in the Republican party since 1999 growing to a dangerous level, the rapid growth of China and many other nations reducing our influence significantly and making trade more competitive.

many of these issues brought out the rights anger, frustration, resentment, feelings of inadequacy, their inferiority complex, their hurt pride, fear of change, their disillusionment, etc and so they have decided to support someone that doesn't care about democracy or rule of law, someone that will destroy the order we created and set everything back to zero, hoping maybe that will fix everything and bring America back to the way it used to be. which it won't, because you can't go back in time through deregulation, all it'll accomplish is turning America into a cyberpunk corporate dominated kind of dystopia, slaves to corporations, and with a.i the slaves will become a burden real quick, they will simply dispose of us leaving only the rich corpos to inherit America. voting trump won't help you or anyone else except the rich and the corporations.

a reply to: namehere

I believe it.

for discussion purposes only... I am not a huge fan of Trump and

I'm usually extremely skeptical of the "Q" stuff but this is an interesting nugget.

If nothing else it's Trump's way of saying Im still here you bastards... Im a huge fan of that

x.com...

MJTruthUltra
@MJTruthUltra
🚨 Trump just sent a message to the Deep State

Just after Trumps speech, Opera Singer Sings “Nessun Dorma”

Nessun Dorma is played at the end of the film The Sum of All Fears, in which time ALL the traitors & Deep State Actors were executed.

The Sum of All Fears is mentioned several times in the Q Drops.

Trump is very specific about his songs… he played this for a reason.

rumble.com...

We truly are moving backwards.

Any of you ever heard of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy?

Today, McCarthyism is synonymous with any perceived government activity that suppresses unfavorable political or social views by limiting or undermining vital civil rights and liberties under the pretext of maintaining national security.

It is a means of government harassment that includes blacklisting with intent to pressure people to follow popular political beliefs.

Thus anyone who makes insufficiently supported accusations or engages in unbalanced investigations against persons in an attempt to silence or discredit them is said to be practicing McCarthyism.

This practice in effect represents both a denial of due process and a fundamental breach of civil liberties, thereby violating the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

a reply to: putnam6

We’ll see as he’s likely going to win.

My guess is it will be another underwhelming term, though I’ll be happy to be proven wrong.

I doubt anything will substantially change in terms of how our government operates. But I’ll be thrilled if it does.

a reply to: watchitburn

It could be the why behind everything even going back to the creation of the central banking system I mean think about it. Whoever controls all the money can create whatever scenario they want. Devalue it. Inflate it. Now the common thing you see is people comparing things with inflation calculators and complaining about how expensive everything is even when you adjust it for inflation compared to 20 years ago.

They're the ones pushing higher minimum wage. They're the ones bringing in people who I am sorry this is not meant to be offensive in any way, but if you let in a whole bunch maybe millions of working age people from what are essentially 3rd world countries to America and give these corporations an unlimited pool of workers to treat as they will it has to cause problems for existing workers theres always someone who will do your job. This creates a divide because people want more money government wont up federal minimum wage, corporations don't need to pay more because they can just go onto the next guy.

So it creates an environment where a lot of working class people and we are already hearing it. Rents too high. Cant save money. Food is too high. Etc so it creates this environment where a lot of working class people start thinking about Bezos having a trillion dollars jetting around in outer space while they can barely afford food and rent and then pop culture comes in with movies like Elysium which have the rich people living in space while all us normies live on crappy earth. Or all the ways they can use the internet to shape opinions.

Anyways I just think this is all just one big set up to push the working class to revolt and force communism. They'll get fed up eventually and revolt you know its coming.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: putnam6

We’ll see as he’s likely going to win.

My guess is it will be another underwhelming term, though I’ll be happy to be proven wrong.

I doubt anything will substantially change in terms of how our government operates. But I’ll be thrilled if it does.

Im not suggesting it will or won't

Respectfully you expected too much with a hostile Congress and Senate and MSM and the race riots and COVID.

He had a lot stacked against him in his first term.

Trump's standing at the RNC was 100,000 to one odds 2-3 years ago if not more

a reply to: putnam6

To be fair, the right had all three branches (the first two years)

Leading is hard, getting people to follow you isn’t something everyone can do.

That’s what separates the great presidents from the rest. If you can’t get people to work with you, that’s ultimately on you. If your style is to stir pots, talk smack, and it doesn’t work than I think the methods should be addressed personally.

The government is set up this way by design. If a person gets elected they can only enact their platform if the other branches are on board. It prevents too much change too fast.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

That's the interesting thing. People have forgotten that the president wasn't supposed to be a micromanagement role. The federalists who settup the government made it so the presidents role was to basically lock themselves in a room and tackle big issues, make sure judges did their jobs, and deal with foreign affairs.
Other branches of government and state governments were to tackle almost all policies and issues within the nation.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: putnam6

To be fair, the right had all three branches (the first two years)

Leading is hard, getting people to follow you isn’t something everyone can do.

That’s what separates the great presidents from the rest. If you can’t get people to work with you, that’s ultimately on you. If your style is to stir pots, talk smack, and it doesn’t work than I think the methods should be addressed personally.

The government is set up this way by design. If a person gets elected they can only enact their platform if the other branches are on board. It prevents too much change too fast.

To be fair DJT didn't have a lot of old guard Republicans on his side at all, It's well known Romney, Graham and Cheney loathe the man. FWIW in the DC world of you scratch my back I'll scratch yours, is there doubt that they would lobby other Republicans against most Trump-approved legislation? Even Mitch worked with Trump grudgingly.

fivethirtyeight.com...

a reply to: putnam6

Right, but his campaign was just as much about calling the right out as the left. Remember the primaries? He railed into them.

So if that was his strategy, and it didn’t work when it came time to getting them on board, who does that fall on?

And ultimately, if that term was about spinning tires, musical chairs in the cabinet, and finishing up with the largest debt for a single term, do we still chalk it up as a good presidency?

For me personally the answer is no. We haven’t had a good president in this millennium. It’s been one blunder after the next. The current and last president have almost doubled the debt in 8 short years.

It was at 5 trillion going into 2000, now it’s at 35 trillion.

And while both parties try to point the blame, the only thing that rings true is they’ve had about equal time at the helm through that period. That speaks volume to me about the fiscal responsibility of either side.

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: quintessentone

"we are trained Marxists" - BLM founder

In the day, Friedrick Engels was a 1%er.
His family owned alot of textile mills in the Birmingham England area and bought approximately 70% of their cotton from the confederate states.
Engels provided Marx with a small stipend of $30 a year and room and board, even a maid till Marx got her pregnant.
Marx only real job was part-time writer for newspapers so he basically he lived off of slave labor.


It doesn't seem like they've ever read Marx and Engel's work as they were militantly against any equality/social justice movements. Marxist philosposhy views them as distractions and divisions amongst the proletariat and would have opposed MLK/Civil Rights, let alone BLM/George Floyd movement.

Marxism/Socialism views Capitalism as the root cause of all inequality and proles need to soley focus on uniting and otherthrowing capitalist oligarchy. Only then could something like equality be worked towards and/or achieved.

There's an extremist/militant view that engaging in wokism, donating/volunteering for charities and even giving a starving child food makes you complicit in covering up the failures of the state (and thus the enemy)

Plus IIRC BLM founders were found guilty of fraud and using donations to enrich themselves rather than its intended use which would put them in capitalist, radical individualists whose actions are more like Ayn Rand's philosophies.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: quintessentone

You're not a serious person.

I showed where they plainly admit to being Marxists and you start screeching "Racism!"

Go be a clown elsewhere.

Really, is stating black people want a piece of the pie, or rather what's left of the crumbs, screaming racism?

No soap.

Yea and they noticed their piece was going to all the illegals the fed allowed all over the country! BLM was just another snake oil being hawked. How much of those donations went to help blacks that weren't part of BLM? Getting ripped off by their own and the party that claims to be there to help pulls money that would help them, all for the new cause! Seems the reason they are begging for crumbs has less to do with Republicans than you claim.

originally posted by: hangedman13

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: quintessentone

You're not a serious person.

I showed where they plainly admit to being Marxists and you start screeching "Racism!"

Go be a clown elsewhere.

Really, is stating black people want a piece of the pie, or rather what's left of the crumbs, screaming racism?

No soap.

Yea and they noticed their piece was going to all the illegals the fed allowed all over the country! BLM was just another snake oil being hawked. How much of those donations went to help blacks that weren't part of BLM? Getting ripped off by their own and the party that claims to be there to help pulls money that would help them, all for the new cause! Seems the reason they are begging for crumbs has less to do with Republicans than you claim.

What are you talking about? I never mentioned a party, I am trying to push that both party economic mandates are not going to help the people in any way.

The idea that the Liberals and progressives want complete control of society at government power levels is pretty much right on. What is good for the people as perceived by a small group of individuals in power forms marxism and communism control. WE will not have any personal rights if the new age liberals and progressives take control, propaganda will be extensively used to control society, so will fear of many things that only our special bias agencies they will create will be allowed to interpret or validate.

The new type of government they are trying to create is not an existing type, it is a blend of marxism, communism, and socialism. WE will be forced to comply, they are decieving the poor and the more radical groups which they will eventually have to imprison or retrain or get rid of...probably suicides and accidents...in the future if they can not enslave them.

Just because you get paid to work, does not mean you are free or not a slave to society or government leaders.

imo...Project 25, that trump endorses, will drive many more people away from trump than the fear of a BS communism ever will. The US is a Corporate Capitalistic Nation and will remain so.

www.bbc.com...