Let's Talk About a Possible Shooter on the Water Tower

I offer two newly emerged bits of evidence that possibly suggest that not only did the shooter NOT act alone (as the FBI immediately concluded after admitting to not even being able to access the shooter's phone)...but, that in addition to the dead shooter on the roof, an additional shooter may have been positioned on the nearby water tower with direct line of sight to the stage where Trump and at least three others were shot (with one death).

Evidence #1

"Dallas Alexander was part of the special operations unit that broke the world record for the longest confirmed sniper kill.

He's worked VIP protection at the highest levels and believes Trump's would-be assassin didn't act alone: "someone on the 'inside' had to have helped with this."

After professionally examining the crime area with the ultimate sniper's eye, Mr. Alexander spoke of assessing only TWO prime positions for a sniper to get direct line of sight on Trump on the stage.

One of these was the roof of the building.
The second was the water tower.

WATCH @ 9:35 in the VIDEO:
x.com... 517f81268c96693da45%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fshows%2Fthe-glenn-beck-program%2Fsniper-with-longest-confirmed-kill-claims- trump-near-assassination-was-an-inside-job-but-glenn-and-panel-have-questions

Mr. Alexander also vehemently believes there had to be more than one shooter at the rally that day.

Evidence #2

THIS is a witness interview in which a spectator specifically mentions seeing TWO shooters...with one being on the WATER TOWER.
VIDEO: x.com...

According to an expert in sniper fire (by anyone's standards)...there are TWO prime positions to hit Trump at the rally...and BOTH appear to have been left wide open to be occupied.


So...WHY are we not hearing more about the water tower and a potential second shooter?

originally posted by: CarlLaFong



So...WHY are we not hearing more about the water tower and a potential second shooter?

could it be the obvious answer?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: CarlLaFong



So...WHY are we not hearing more about the water tower and a potential second shooter?

could it be the obvious answer?

'Grassy Knoll' 2.0

Thats 830 feet away, They would have to be up high to get a good vantage point, and IF the picture from the earshot is legit that shot had a level trajectory

Not to mention they had big cajones to climb up there with the police staging building so close by.

Just discussing this and fleshing it out,but it all smells rotten to me. Hard to believe the ineptness levels obvious here, the building and water tower should have been covered

a reply to: putnam6

with the failures noted thus far, to ignore the tower, and be sure not to bother with it until the second shooter made it down safely and back to his office at Quantico, would make more sense than not.

Funny this , I was just thinking the same possibility if this guy sucked at shooting.

It's not only the water tower there is a whole cluster of trees in between


x.com...


Post

See new posts
Conversation
MJTruthUltra
@MJTruthUltra
This does not look good…

Multiple Eye Witnesses say there was Another Shooter at the Trump Rally

🔴 Video #1
• lady saw the the counter sniper firing down towards the water tower. (rumble.com...)

🔴 Video #2
• The sharpshooter shot and killed the gentleman in the water tower.
—— they got the shooter on the water tower, but wasn’t able to immediately get the shooter on the roof, which is why they wanted them to leave immediately.
(rumble.com...)

🔴 Video #3
• Lady says her kid and daughter in law were on the other side of the fence, behind them, and she said there was one shooter by the fence (assuming building) and another the water tower.
(rumble.com...)

There’s other videos…

a reply to: CarlLaFong

I feel like someone should be archiving all of this early reporting so when it is a scrubbed and sanitized later someone has it in an external HD offline

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: putnam6

with the failures noted thus far, to ignore the tower, and be sure not to bother with it until the second shooter made it down safely and back to his office at Quantico, would make more sense than not.

Why Quantico?

Trump had/has more to gain by staging an (unsuccessful, naturally) attempt on his life, than Biden has on a successful assassination of his political rival.

If Trump does not win the election, he will most certainly be sent to prison on whatever charges that can be made to stick. Given his age, even a relatively brief prison sentence could turn into a "life sentence". In a sense, Trump is running for his life.

So, if this was an "inside job", it is just as likely, if not more so, that the "inside" was from inside the Trump campaign committee.

Without Trump's knowledge, of course.

Its definitely possible .

Has this been pointed out to anyone? In the video at about the 1"50 mark you can see a guy in full military uniform with a rifle in front of the suv . It looks like he hears something on his headset right as 45 is being shoved in the SUV and he then takes a couple steps forward and aims his rifle right in the direction of 45.

It is odd if nothing else.

originally posted by: putnam6
Thats 830 feet away, They would have to be up high to get a good vantage point, and IF the picture from the earshot is legit that shot had a level trajectory

Remember...not only did Trump turn his head at the precise moment to avoid instant death...
He had his head tilted UP...in order to view the graphics on the elevated screen.

The wound suggests bullet entrance at the lower front half of the right ear...exiting the upper back half of the ear.
This suggests entrance from a higher elevation with the head tilted upwards.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: putnam6

with the failures noted thus far, to ignore the tower, and be sure not to bother with it until the second shooter made it down safely and back to his office at Quantico, would make more sense than not.

Why Quantico?

Trump had/has more to gain by staging an (unsuccessful, naturally) attempt on his life, than Biden has on a successful assassination of his political rival.

If Trump does not win the election, he will most certainly be sent to prison on whatever charges that can be made to stick. Given his age, even a relatively brief prison sentence could turn into a "life sentence". In a sense, Trump is running for his life.

So, if this was an "inside job", it is just as likely, if not more so, that the "inside" was from inside the Trump campaign committee.

Without Trump's knowledge, of course.

Trump's court cases are falling apart #1, even with an appeal not certain BTW, it will go all the way to SCOTUS

#2 he was pulling away in the polls before Saturday, why jeopardize the lead with such a tenuous plan in a state that supported Biden, it would not be easy to find willing partners

#3 Explain the plan of the Team Trump ending up with a candidate shot in his ear?

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Ah , Patsy Diversion Shooter Shoots First Giving a Second or Third Shooter an Opportunity to Fire from a Concealed Location immediately After . Circumstances then Change when the " Target " Reacts to the Diversionary Shot and immediately Ducks Down Behind the Podium thus becoming Out of Sight to the Other Possible One or Two Other Shooters . Operation Fails to get the Kill Shot and the Other Shooters Escape the Area . What are the Probabilities of that Actually Happening . Are they Very Low or Higher ?

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: putnam6
Thats 830 feet away, They would have to be up high to get a good vantage point, and IF the picture from the earshot is legit that shot had a level trajectory

Remember...not only did Trump turn his head at the precise moment to avoid instant death...
He had his head tilted UP...in order to view the graphics on the elevated screen.

The wound suggests bullet entrance at the lower front half of the right ear...exiting the upper back half of the ear.
This suggests entrance from a higher elevation with the head tilted upwards.

Here's the picture It's not even close to an angle. All Im saying this shot looks like it came from a lower location, so low Im not even sure it the earshot it could be a close miss from Crooks or another shooter.

Haven't seen a video with a decent soundtrack, it will probably have to be separated and analyzed

originally posted by: Mantiss2021

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: putnam6

with the failures noted thus far, to ignore the tower, and be sure not to bother with it until the second shooter made it down safely and back to his office at Quantico, would make more sense than not.

Why Quantico?

Trump had/has more to gain by staging an (unsuccessful, naturally) attempt on his life, than Biden has on a successful assassination of his political rival.

If Trump does not win the election, he will most certainly be sent to prison on whatever charges that can be made to stick. Given his age, even a relatively brief prison sentence could turn into a "life sentence". In a sense, Trump is running for his life.

So, if this was an "inside job", it is just as likely, if not more so, that the "inside" was from inside the Trump campaign committee.

Without Trump's knowledge, of course.

First of all, Trump isn’t going to prison for any of the Democrat manufactured charges, the cases are flimsy at best to begin with.
The one that could have caused him the most problems was dismissed yesterday and that one wasn’t going to result in a prison sentence no matter what.

The idea that Trump or his campaign would stage this shooting is ludicrous.
For what reason would they do that? I would really like to know why they would need to stage something like that.

However, if it was staged by him, it is the 3rd biggest scam perpetrated on the American people after Covid and the 2020 election.

a reply to: Mantiss2021

Trump mock trial was nothing but a joke, he was never going to jail, fines probably but no jail, no matter how much the liberals were salivating at it.

One person killed and 3 wounded including the former president is not flag and is no joke.

a reply to: putnam6

The cases are not "falling apart", they are delayed and being reviewed. If Trump loses his bid in the election, it will seriously impact the clout judges he has appointed, and who have aided in causing the delays, will be able to exert to help his appeals. It us quite possible that some, or all , of those judges might be impeached and removed from their benches.

The race is still too close to call, and was prior to the attempt last Saturday. Remember, Trump, and many of his supporters believed that he was ahead both the polls and the election back in 2020. And yet, Biden has been serving as President for the last for years. A staged "narrow escape from assassination" would (and has) go a long way towards roping in impressionableswing voters in all states.

It's basic (political) theater.

Or as Trump likes to say, it brings in the "ratings".


The plan, "plan", if it existed, did not include Trump actually being injured: he would never had agreed to that, had he been informed. Just shots being fired, perhaps even blank rounds being used (we'll never know for certain).

But something went terribly wrong, people were injured, one killed.

I must say, given the tenor of today's divisive society, and the stakes at hand, as I suggested, in my most cynical outlook it us not beyond imagination to suggest that the murder of an innocent bystander might have been part of the scenario; as a way to "sell" the drama.

We are but pawns to the Powers That Be, after all.

Expendable.

So my conspiracy friends answer me this! Who does the secret service answer to? Trump? Or to their superiors in the company? So how on gods green earth would Trumps team pull that off? Do you think security procedures could be changed by Trump and/or his team? If you do you should refrain from posting for a bit. The failures, despite your conspiracies saying otherwise all fall on the secret service. They did not secure the area and that is all on them! Now they are saying the shooter purchased a ladder for the event! Let's ignore the lunacy of what they are implying, that the guy not only carried his rifle up to the rooftop but he brought and placed the ladder also! AND NO ONE NOTICED THAT? Too much misdirection from the people investigating this matter.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

I posted this in some other place as well...can't find....Anywho just happen to see this but can't find much more on it

Audio Forensics say as many as 3 guns fired at Trump rally - LINK - LINK2

The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final "acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.

Also seen this on the water tower as well - LINK


Lets see if Firearms Forensics can match bullet with shooters gun and person who died or others .....IF any bullets were found

The SS director said they didn't secure the roof the shooter was on because the roof was sloped and it would be dangerous.
The two counter-snipers were positioned on a roof with a much greater slope.

SS director is making up excuses as she goes along.