Trump Florida case dismissed

Breaking now:

Link

Judge Cannon has dismissed the case based on Jack Smith's unlawful appointment.

More as it's available.

ETA:

Court LIstener page.

Former President Trump’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment Based on the Unlawful
Appointment and Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith is GRANTED in accordance with this
Order [ECF No. 326]. The Superseding Indictment is DISMISSED because Special Counsel
Smith’s appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution. U.S.
Const., Art. II, § 2, cl. 2. Special Counsel Smith’s use of a permanent indefinite appropriation also
violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const., Art. I, § 9, cl. 7, but the Court need not address
the proper remedy for that funding violation given the dismissal on Appointments Clause grounds.
The effect of this Order is confined to this proceeding.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

FBI need to be prosecuted for fraud.

Those photos were straight up election interference and false/misleading.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Ooh, the talking heads are going to be upset.

Will they be able to contain themselves?

Or will they go right back screeching about "literally Hitler" and "putting people in camps" after saying we should turn down the temperature?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

FBI entrapment too. The search warrant was illegally obtained!

a reply to: watchitburn

Well, "Morning Joe" was pulled of the air today.

Perhaps tomorrow.....

originally posted by: pianopraze
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

FBI need to be prosecuted for fraud.

Those photos were straight up election interference and false/misleading.

Who is going to do it? They won't investigate and prosecute their own or the leaders of this coop are going down faster than a speeding bullet. Pun intended. This is a coop against the COTUS and the American way. We have just witnessed a clue as to whom is in on it.

Wow....

originally posted by: putnam6
Wow....

that's what I was going to say. Just like that. but add the F'n wow to it.

Freakin Awesome!!!!!

Good, these charges never should have been brought against him to begin with.

So with that recent supreme court ruling opening up departments of the govt to law suits does that mean trump can sue for the money lost to lawyers?

a reply to: Martin75

Correct, exactly correct.


(Also good to see you're still around ma'am)

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: putnam6
Wow....

that's what I was going to say. Just like that. but add the F'n wow to it.

I know,

So will they appeal, I guess that is the question or atleast that's what snarky Left's comment on X/Twitter is saying.

Regardless this is a major win for Trump...

Damnit sounds like somebody is pushing buttons if not it's very coincidental.

All that leaves is the Georgia Fulton County case....and it's on wobbly AF legs

a reply to: putnam6

and the interesting part is, this decision wasn't made this weekend, this opinion was likely written over several days, and was in motion before the events of the assassination attempt. (based on what folks who do this have said)

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: putnam6

and the interesting part is, this decision wasn't made this weekend, this opinion was likely written over several days, and was in motion before the events of the assassination attempt. (based on what folks who do this have said)

Well damn, that's interesting too, some interesting back channel chit going on perhaps.

a reply to: pianopraze

And this is now who is investigating the weekend assassination attempt.
Good lord. Surreal.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: putnam6

and the interesting part is, this decision wasn't made this weekend, this opinion was likely written over several days, and was in motion before the events of the assassination attempt. (based on what folks who do this have said)

In other words, perfectly timed to coincide with the beginning of the RNC. It’s almost like judge Cannon is on Trump’s payroll.

a reply to: Boomer1947

Our maybe he was illegally appointed. That is the actual fact. She is on no one payroll. She is a judge who followed the law.

Amazing huh?

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: putnam6

and the interesting part is, this decision wasn't made this weekend, this opinion was likely written over several days, and was in motion before the events of the assassination attempt. (based on what folks who do this have said)

And one of the most satisfying aspects of the dismissal is how Black Justice Clarence Thomas struck back at the liberal attackers of Trump and himself. He is the ultimate overseer of all Florida/Georgia cases.

Justice Clarence Thomas approves of Judge Aileen Cannon's decision. (I did a thread on this over a year ago.)

Want to appeal it, numbskulls Biden and Garland? Take it to the Supreme Court, LOL!

Phuck all of you! (Biden/Garland/FBI-15/Smith)

originally posted by: Irishhaf
So with that recent supreme court ruling opening up departments of the govt to law suits does that mean trump can sue for the money lost to lawyers?

He might could but I wouldn't go there. If the true goal is unification, everyone loses and everyone wins. But everyone needs to try. Sometimes you have to lick your wounds and let it go.

I was so happy to hear the news earlier. In a 93 page report no less. So it's been in the works obviously and evidently it was time to play the Ace in the hole.