It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Justoneman
The ONLy Chance for Justice concerning that is Military Tribunals , but it has to be done Constitutionally .
From Nov 30th 2020: slate.com...
The new rule is worded with deceptive simplicity: “Federal executions are to be carried out by lethal injection or by any other manner prescribed by the law of the State in which the sentence was imposed.” Behind this bureaucratic prose hides a stark fact: In our supposedly civilized nation, the federal government now will be able to hang, electrocute, gas, or shoot individuals if it does not want to kill them by lethal injection.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: TzarChasm
It's for juries to decide in objective trials with all the evidence presented.
And the evidence is substantial.
So you agree it's not the president's job to file charges or assign prosecution. The president can fire somebody but can't put them in jail. That's a judicial function separate from the executive branch.
Almost all of DC and Congress critters appear to be compromised. How can we let them decide their own fate for their crimes that way? We can't that is how. Portions of our Judicious system is compromised in RICO crimes. We need the military tribunals to dispense their justice now.
originally posted by: StudioNada
sure, Trump should accept apologies....
but that does not include 'forgiveness and a 'clean slate' for the perps
Full Story Here: apnews.com...
NEW YORK (AP) — A judge on Tuesday modified Donald Trump’s gag order, freeing the former president to comment publicly about witnesses and jurors in the hush money criminal trial that led to his felony conviction but keeping others connected to the case off limits at least until he’s sentenced July 11.
Judge Juan M. Merchan’s ruling — just days before Trump’s debate Thursday with President Joe Biden — clears the presumptive Republican nominee to again go on the attack against his former lawyer Michael Cohen, porn actor Stormy Daniels and other witnesses.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: WeMustCare
If congress and/or DOJ agree to pursue criminal charges, then yes. Good luck with that. One man in the White House doesn't change the equation anymore than it did in 2020 when zero (0) criminals were apprehended or punished for their misdeeds. Time will tell.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: WeMustCare
If congress and/or DOJ agree to pursue criminal charges, then yes. Good luck with that. One man in the White House doesn't change the equation anymore than it did in 2020 when zero (0) criminals were apprehended or punished for their misdeeds. Time will tell.
One AG (Letitia) and one DA (Bragg) in New York set a historical precedent.
One AG working with U.S. President Trump 2.0 can do the same...and so much more.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: WeMustCare
If congress and/or DOJ agree to pursue criminal charges, then yes. Good luck with that. One man in the White House doesn't change the equation anymore than it did in 2020 when zero (0) criminals were apprehended or punished for their misdeeds. Time will tell.
One AG (Letitia) and one DA (Bragg) in New York set a historical precedent.
One AG working with U.S. President Trump 2.0 can do the same...and so much more.
So what you're saying here is the next AG, presumably a more conservative appointee, will emulate the legal strategems and ethics displayed by Letitia and Bragg?
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: WeMustCare
CNN turns Total Tyrant , but it Will Lose this Battle...............
www.infowars.com...