It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Can anyone explain the crime Trump did?

page: 33
21
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha



When is the constitutional definition of guilty where you can find a person guilty on any theory you choose?
edit on 11-6-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:13 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Kida hard to get angry when the judges own instructions literally list theory…

The Trump conviction is such obvious harassment you can only laugh at the stupidity, cry that the legal system is dead. Why would anyone fight for America that now it’s no better than any banana republic or Russia.
edit on 11-6-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:21 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:22 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:24 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:25 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:26 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:35 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:43 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude

Are you a CPA or an accountant? I sure hope not!

Do you understand why even business expense items labeled "miscellaneous" need to be identified, legally? If so, then you also understand why legal expenses also need to be itemized and and can't just be hidden under some mysterious "miscellaneous legal expenses" moniker.



My wife works for a CPA, and if I asked her what to categorize a payment to my lawyer as, she keeps telling me it's a legal expense. But regardless of what she said, I really want to know what it should have been. She's wrong, and I'm clueless. I get it. No issues there. But I really have to know just in case I run for office and one of those bay watch babes I had that hot tub party with back in 2011 might want to get paid, and if that happens, I really have to do it right so I don't get found guilty of a crime.

Be a dear and either tell me how it should be listed, or admit you just don't know.



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 07:59 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 12 2024 @ 02:56 AM
link   
TRUMP SPEAKING ABOUT 9/11 AND THEN TRUMP 3 DAYS LATER. WHAT CHANGED?

Trump has always been an outsider not being on the script that day. He knew how to work twitter with a strong personality. He has high expectations for the nation that caused a lot more work for the departments. Was more business minded when setting budgets, more resistant to all the leakage.

With all the publicity and conflict around this issue it does raise the question of what crime did Michael Flynn do? Flynn knows where all the bodies are buried.

Michael Flynn for Vice President on a Trump ticket.


(post by 1TricketyHobbit removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Jun, 12 2024 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude



My wife works for a CPA, and if I asked her what to categorize a payment to my lawyer as, she keeps telling me it's a legal expense


Your wife is NOT a CPA and you are NOT a presidential candidate paying off a porn star you slept with to protect your candidacy.



posted on Jun, 12 2024 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Except your position is easily refuted by it happening historically and often

Nice try



posted on Jun, 12 2024 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Except your position is easily refuted by it happening historically and often

Nice try



For example?

ETA: My position is the jury's position, in that they found Trump guilty according to the prosecution's "theories" and the judge's instructions. I am, however, looking forward to Trump's appeal.

edit on 2320242024k10America/Chicago2024-06-12T18:10:23-05:0006pm2024-06-12T18:10:23-05:00 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2024 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

How do you find someone guilty of a second crime when it’s only theoretical, driven home that 12 jurors could not come to a unanimous decision of what the second crime beyond a reasonable doubt for an accusation that by the constitution is required to be clearly stated at the beginning of the trial and never was.

Sarcasm…
Well, trials almost over. Here are three theories of a crime were its not stated at the beginning for the defendant to mount a defense. And we are going to call a legal NDA “hush money” to act like it was an implied crime. Sarcasm off….


That is not the US legal system where every benefit is given to the defendant being innocent until a juror of 12 can come to an unanimous decision there is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for charges clearly listed at the beginning of the trial.



posted on Jun, 12 2024 @ 06:28 PM
link   
THE TOPIC

Can anyone explain the crime Trump did?









YOU are responsible for your own posts

And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join