It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jofafot
I don't need to prove videos can be fake.
originally posted by: jofafot
It is a known fact since devices capable of editing videos were invented
originally posted by:
a reply to: DBCowboy
Oh I am so sorry I didn't instantly believe a video that could've been from anywhere and could've been easily taken out of context for propaganda purposes.
originally posted by: jofafot
a reply to: Lazy88
Questioning legitimacy of what's shared on this forum is supposed to be what it is all about as a "conspiracy theory" site. And no, I am not going away, I'd rather talk about it where it was shared. So, are you going to provide an actual argument or are you going to keep making things personal?
It possible man can travel to the moon. Does Hamas have a moon base? It’s possible, is it not?
Possible doesn’t equate reality.
You’re using nothing but innuendo to pass your unfounded opinion as a fact.
Which is like posting rockets so Hamas moon base.
Possible is not proof of is.
but then again burden of proof falls upon the person who made the claim. And no, asking for proof is not a claim. It is a question. So, you either prove your claim about me, or accept the fact that you can't and you are once again trying to make things personal.
originally posted by: jofafot
a reply to: Lazy88
It possible man can travel to the moon. Does Hamas have a moon base? It’s possible, is it not?
Possible doesn’t equate reality.
You’re using nothing but innuendo to pass your unfounded opinion as a fact.
Which is like posting rockets so Hamas moon base.
Possible is not proof of is.
Or maybe I am using common sense. I mean, what are the chances of hamas having a base on moon? Is THAT what you understood from what I've written so far?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: jofafot
a reply to: DBCowboy
Define what you mean by "clear data" please.
Because you say there is "clear data" but I just saw a video from TRT World that is conveniently placed there to make it look like palestinians are faking everything.
Prove it's fake or shut up.
Simple.
originally posted by: jofafot
a reply to: DBCowboy
I am just going to copy-paste my reply from previous page:
but then again burden of proof falls upon the person who made the claim. And no, asking for proof is not a claim. It is a question. So, you either prove your claim about me, or accept the fact that you can't and you are once again trying to make things personal.
originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy
Did the Israeli government (and the US government too for you that matter) push a campaign of lies, propaganda and skewed data concerning the pandemic, the virus origin and the vaccines that ultimately created long-term economic hardship and health problems including death for its citizens?
originally posted by: jofafot
a reply to: NorthOS
Is there a way to know these videos are infact coming from gaza?
Assuming this video in particular is not propaganda and it is real I don't see why majority of palestinians would be still supporting hamas.
originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy
Did the Israeli government (and the US government too for you that matter) push a campaign of lies, propaganda and skewed data concerning the pandemic, the virus origin and the vaccines that ultimately created long-term economic hardship and health problems including death for its citizens?
Holder of the burden
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim, especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.[1] This is also stated in Hitchens's razor, which declares that "what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence." Carl Sagan proposed a related criterion – "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" – which is known as the Sagan standard.[2]
While certain kinds of arguments, such as logical syllogisms, require mathematical or strictly logical proofs, the standard for evidence to meet the burden of proof is usually determined by context and community standards and conventions.[3][4]
Philosophical debate can devolve into arguing about who has the burden of proof about a particular claim. This has been described as "burden tennis" or the "onus game".[5][6][7]
Shifting the burden of proof
One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by committing a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance. It occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.[8][9]
Wait, Hamas has a moon base? Does Isreal still have space lasers?