Iranian Lawmaker Declares Iran Has Nuclear Weapons

originally posted by: Mwawa

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
a reply to: Boomer1947

Iran never agreed to 24/7 monitoring of its nuclear facilities in the JCPOA.

Iran dictated which facilities were "nuclear facilities" and those were the only ones that were subject to monitoring and inspection under the JCPOA. They specifically left out a number of facilities that Western intelligence knew were nuclear facilities but Iran wouldn't agree to monitoring and inspections at those facilities and we signed the deal anyway.

This would be like if you caught your kid using drugs, so you were gonna start searching their room for drugs, but you let your kid tell you "I only hide drugs in these few places and those are the only places you're allowed to look."

And even the facilities the IAEA were allowed to inspect, they had to give Iran advanced notice. Iran could delay the process up to 3 weeks and still technically be in compliance. Monitoring was done with cameras and sensors, but Iran had ultimate control of them and could turn them off and obviously knew where they all were so they could circumvent them.

The JCPOA was a joke. Iran was completely in charge. The Obama negotiating team were desperate to just get A deal before Obama left office, and Iran knew that. That's a horrible position to go into a negotiation, because the other side can rake you over the coals knowing you'll agree to almost anything just so you can claim "success."

We had all the leverage. Sanctions worked for once and brought Iran to the table, and Obama and Kerry gave away the farm.

And why should they?

They have the right to have a deterrent

No they don't. Given that you keep getting banned and coming back, I'd advise you to at least read the thread before you reply so you don't waste replies embarrassing yourself like this. Iran is a signatory to the NPT.

Nuclear weapons are not for war but for annihilation of the human species and every other living creature (should they be used at a large scale).

No wonder you can't make sensible posts. You don't understand the issue. You just have a few lines of propaganda memorized and think that makes you "informed."

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

He's gone again, came back and gone again.

"Whack a Mole".

a reply to: RussianTroll

Why are Iranians worse than Anglo-Saxons, Russians or Jews?

The fact that Iran's legal system is based on Islamic law, aka Sharia law and the fact that they support terrorist scum springs to mind.

Same kind of terrorist scum that just handed your Russian security forces their own arse at the Moscow concert hall.

Now imagine them armed with a nuclear device.

Or do you think that they are second-class citizens?

It's not about being a second-class citizen but about giving a box of matches to religious maniacs who want to burn things to the ground aka a bad idea.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

He's gone again, came back and gone again.

"Whack a Mole".

Yeah I can't even keep track.

a reply to: FlyersFan

They have had nuclear weapons for decades.

What they do not have, is immunity to certainly guaranteed retaliation strikes.

Since democrats under the O'buma Regime, have them pallets of cash, it's not a matter of if, but when terrorists go nuclear.

A History of Iran's Nuclear Program | Iran Watch
www.iranwatch.org...
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Iran ran a covert project to develop and test nuclear weapons called the Amad Plan

Stuxnet delayed Irans processing & enriching, but did not stop it.