Medvedev: “No one can hide, a global catastrophe is coming”

a reply to: lostgirl

Lostgirl, let's imagine for a moment that you're right and your sources aren't full of bat# crazy ideas like I think. I have only one question for you:

If Texas announced independence today, would you be cool about that? Would you say like: Screw the US, let Texas go its own way?

This is a serious question.

Double my bad.

Something went wrong in the edit.

a reply to: andy06shake,


This old skit came to mind.

a reply to: annonentity

Smashing.

But how does that answer my question as to how you hold free and fair referendums in active war zones where the occupier does not hold sway over the entirety of the land?

Would you like to try again?

a reply to: annonentity

That's called a parody for comedic purposes.

And not an answer as to how.

I'll just say this, when the world is engulfed in nuclear fire, suddenly the idea of defending Ukraine and defeating Putin won't seem very important, it will be the last thing on the mind of most people. This isn't about choosing a side anymore, whether Ukraine or Russia wins the conflict is irrelevant in the face of total annihilation of the planet. I see a lot of people here who are willing to risk a global nuclear war just to get the better of Russia.

Just like with Covid, they are willing to tear down everything in the name of a political ideology, and the end result will be suffering on a scale never seen before in human history, then they'll suddenly change their tune and admit we made some dumb decisions... all because the EU and the west are so desperate not to let Russia get a win. Russia is also clearly desperate, and willing to go nuclear if all else fails.

I stand firmly by what I said years ago when the war started, it would have been over quickly and many people would still be alive if we stayed out of their land dispute. The west would also have many more billions of dollars to help their own nations recover from the vast economic damage caused by our stubborn egotistical leaders who are incapable of admitting when they are wrong, until it's too late to reverse the damage done.

a reply to: lostgirl

You know what's funny about that comment?

Funny about occupation, war, and invasion, I'm apt to go with not much.

If Russia had 'held' even as much as 51% "sway over the territory", the western propagandized sheeple would be claiming that there couldn't have been "free and fair referendums", because 'those poor Ukrainians were intimidated by the Russians' and 'forced' to vote in favor of joining Russia.

Im afraid thats not an answer as to how you hold free and fair referendums in active warzones where the occupier does not hold all of the territory, or anything reminiscent of the sorts.

Just a cop-out as you are not addressing the logistical impossibilities involved in doing such a thing.

If you don't hold sway over all of the land then a referendum is impossible because you can't poll all the people hence it's hardly fair or in any way legally binding.

And as far as those 143 UN votes -
- if you look outside the mainstream media propaganda purveyors (avoid Google, it's no conspiracy that they do indeed, do the US DOD's bidding) you can actually find reputable journalists who outline the many ways that the UN has been corrupted by western governments and 'captured' by corporate oligarchs.

Again that does not change the fact that the UN voted 143 votes against 5 in condemnation of Putin's sham referendums.

But mealy outlines the fact that you dont like the UN or hold with their decisions.

What a surprise.

As to what you call reputable journalists, well that's debatable.

In posts above, I've provided two excellent sources of real, true information supported by historical documentation - from those, you should be able to find legitimate references leading to just such esteemed journalists as noted -

Have you?

So you keep saying, and yet Oliver Stone is still a conspiracy theorist, and i think i came across somebody's blog you seem to have posted as evidence.

sonar21.com...

"Son of The New American Revolution" eh?

That's rather telling.

I'm apt to ponder you're a big Tucker fan.

I guess you thought the movie "JFK" was a factual documentary as opposed to "80% of the film being in factual error" and a fictionalised account of the events surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy?

my 'homework' is done for the day.

If you say so.

It's a shame Putin cannot claim the same regarding Ukraine.

Are we 10 seconds from midnight? Will the nukes fly any day now? Judge Napolitano and Scot Ritter think we may now be on the precipice of Armageddon over Ukraine.

Scott Ritter : Russia's Next Move: Unpacking the Future of the Ukraine Conflict

a reply to: charlest2

Is this the same fellow who is a convicted sex offender that involved a minor?

Ritter was the subject of two law enforcement sting operations in 2001.[39] He was charged in June 2001 with trying to set up a meeting with an undercover police officer posing as a 16-year-old girl.[40][41] He was charged with a misdemeanor crime of "attempted endangerment of the welfare of a child". The charge was dismissed and the record was sealed after he completed six months of pre-trial probation.[41][8]

Ritter was arrested again in November 2009[42] over communications with a police decoy he met on an Internet chat site. Police said that he exposed himself, via a web camera, after the officer repeatedly identified himself as a 15-year-old girl.[5]

The next month, Ritter waived his right to a preliminary hearing and was released on $25,000 unsecured bail. Charges included "unlawful contact with a minor, criminal use of a communications facility, corruption of minors, indecent exposure, possessing instruments of crime, criminal attempt and criminal solicitation".[2] Ritter rejected a plea bargain and was found guilty of all but the criminal attempt count in a courtroom in Monroe County, Pennsylvania, on April 14, 2011.[5][43]

In October 2011, he received a sentence of one and a half to five and a half years in prison.[3] He was sent to Laurel Highlands state prison in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, in March 2012 and paroled in September 2014.

The creep appears to be a "stoat the ba" charlest2.



en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: andy06shake
He is human. Was he set up? Maybe, knowing our government. What does that have to do with his expertise in the field? Nothing!

SCOTT RITTER is an external Contributor to Energy Intelligence. He is a former US Marine Corps Intelligence Officer whose service over a 20-plus-year career included tours of duty in the former Soviet Union implementing arms control agreements, serving on the staff of US Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf during the Gulf War and later as a Chief Weapons Inspector with the UN in Iraq from 1991-98.

a reply to: charlest2

He's a convicted beast.

Read the evidence, was he set up multiple times?

I'm worried now if that's the sort of horrible bastard you are willing to place faith in to be honest.

What does common sense tell us about pedophiles charlest2?

freebeacon.com...

a reply to: andy06shake

Oh, you believe what you will. I don't care anymore.

When the nukes land in your backyard, I'll just smile and say you were warned.

a reply to: charlest2

Oh, you believe what you will. I don't care anymore.

Do you mean the facts and recorded evidence that covers multiple incidents?

Whereas you believe pedophiles.

Oh dear, that tells us everything we need to know really.

When the nukes land in your backyard, I'll just smile and say, you're welcome.

Yadda yadda yadda.

A backhanded, thinly veiled, piss-poor attempt at a threat from someone silly enough to entertain the ramblings of a known "stoat the ba" hardly carries with it much weight.

Need you once again be reminded we live in a M.A.D world where the implications of unleashing nuclear weapons is rather clear.

You have a nice day polishing your nukes.

a reply to: andy06shake

I mean it won't matter much when we are all blown to hell because of our government's stupidity.

I'm going to bed. You think what you will.

a reply to: charlest2

I mean it won't matter much when we are all blown to hell because of our government's stupidity.

Correct but we dont capitulate to Russian scum wanna-be dictators that if you give an inch takes 28,743 sq miles.

I'm going to bed. You think what you will.

You're the one who decided to introduce known sex offenders who have served time in prison by way of evidence to support your claims.

So there is that.

Good night.

a reply to: lostgirl

Greetings, my friend lostgirl. Of course, Larry Johnson is widely known in Russia, as are Douglas McGregor and Scott Ritter, and many others. They are supported by the Russians and they inspire hope that there are honest people left in the United States who have critical thinking and convey to people the real state of affairs.

Special thanks for your kind words to me. This is priceless for me, this is why I am on our favorite forum. I have many friends here, and you are the main thing, and not many of my ill-wishers. It is for the sake of your words that you need to stay on the forum.

Thank you.

a reply to: RussianTroll

So Russians, including yourself, support known convicted pedophiles like Scott Ritter.

Why am i not surprised?

www.theguardian.com...
www.kyivpost.com...
www.standard.co.uk...

a reply to: RussianTroll

Double again, my bad.

a reply to: andy06shake

So we blow up the world and kill 5 or 6 billion people just to save face. Is that your official position?

a reply to: charlest2

That was a short sleep, you must be as bad as me getting.

It's not about saving face.

It's about not capitulating to the whims of dictator scum like Putin. Same reason we fought the likes of Nazi scum in the last world war.

We don't start it buddy, but nor do we give ground or surrender one inch to tyrants neither.

And we will support our allies who choose to fight, NATO member nation or not.

Thats just how we role.

Freedom to Ukraine and down with Mad Vlads scum invaders.