It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
originally posted by: Vermilion
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee
LGBTQ+ — is not a belief. It is an acceptance group for safety — protection — understanding — “like” friendship — equality.
Amazing how many kids adopted into LGBTR2D2 families are also gay. Maybe because they want to be like Mom/Mom or Dad/Dad?
Provide legitimate data for that.
Why is it that the kids of Hollywood and other famous public faces have this magical predisposition to having alphabet kids?
Coincidence?
Ben Afflecks kid is the most recent victim.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
What does a Pride club have to do with religion?
Every time this comes up — it’s:
“But they have a Pride club”
Has the LGBT movement become more of a religion?
What do you think?
What is their doctrine?
LGBT ideology
And that would be what?
LGBTQ* — would be individual people — with individual thoughts — interests — careers— likes — dislikes — etc.
Their ideological approach to homosexuality and 'transgenderism'
This is not a belief.
If there’s an ideology — it’s protection — safety — understanding — of “people of the fringe”.
People “polite society” — shoved to the fringes and who thrived in spite of it — creating their own safe places.
It was only 21 years ago that homosexuality was no longer illegal. Something an LGBTQ+ person could be imprisoned for.
It's not illegal to be homosexual or trans.
I am talking about the ideology pushed in schools and universities on homosexuality and transgenderism.
Not today -- but it used to be.
LGBTQ+ -- are not an ideology. They are individual people. That apparently don't fit YOUR norm. But they fit theirs,
People expressing who they are -- is that what you object to?
Funny no one mentions the musclebound straight guy in a tight tee or a straight girl in her mini-skirts and crop top flaunting their sexuality.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
Very ridiculous putting an adult's interpretation on something and thinking a child will be thinking the same thing.
It boggles the mind.
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
What does a Pride club have to do with religion?
Every time this comes up — it’s:
“But they have a Pride club”
Has the LGBT movement become more of a religion?
What do you think?
What is their doctrine?
LGBT ideology
And that would be what?
LGBTQ* — would be individual people — with individual thoughts — interests — careers— likes — dislikes — etc.
Their ideological approach to homosexuality and 'transgenderism'
This is not a belief.
If there’s an ideology — it’s protection — safety — understanding — of “people of the fringe”.
People “polite society” — shoved to the fringes and who thrived in spite of it — creating their own safe places.
It was only 21 years ago that homosexuality was no longer illegal. Something an LGBTQ+ person could be imprisoned for.
It's not illegal to be homosexual or trans.
I am talking about the ideology pushed in schools and universities on homosexuality and transgenderism.
Not today -- but it used to be.
LGBTQ+ -- are not an ideology. They are individual people. That apparently don't fit YOUR norm. But they fit theirs,
People expressing who they are -- is that what you object to?
Funny no one mentions the musclebound straight guy in a tight tee or a straight girl in her mini-skirts and crop top flaunting their sexuality.
We aren't talking about norms but the type of ideology emerged in schools and universities or even the workplaces.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: Annee
As I stated.
Is this really the intent and laws of the constitution. To ban one group to assemble and silence them, but allow another group to assemble and preach without any challenge to their ideology.
DEI is now the official church and religion of liberal governments to the point its trampling on other’s constitutional rights.
It is because of the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.
Nothing to do with any other club.
How does that Clause extend down to a School and after-school clubs? There must be Precedent?
I posted one lawsuit with link -- that a school district had to pay $200,000.
There are plenty more.
Is precedent not established with these lawsuits?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: Annee
As I stated.
Is this really the intent and laws of the constitution. To ban one group to assemble and silence them, but allow another group to assemble and preach without any challenge to their ideology.
DEI is now the official church and religion of liberal governments to the point its trampling on other’s constitutional rights.
It is because of the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.
Nothing to do with any other club.
How does that Clause extend down to a School and after-school clubs? There must be Precedent?
I posted one lawsuit with link -- that a school district had to pay $200,000.
There are plenty more.
Is precedent not established with these lawsuits?
How did they determine "God" was "religious" or just a name like any other?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Consvoli
originally posted by: Annee
What does a Pride club have to do with religion?
Every time this comes up — it’s:
“But they have a Pride club”
Has the LGBT movement become more of a religion?
What do you think?
What is their doctrine?
LGBT ideology
And that would be what?
LGBTQ* — would be individual people — with individual thoughts — interests — careers— likes — dislikes — etc.
Their ideological approach to homosexuality and 'transgenderism'
This is not a belief.
If there’s an ideology — it’s protection — safety — understanding — of “people of the fringe”.
People “polite society” — shoved to the fringes and who thrived in spite of it — creating their own safe places.
It was only 21 years ago that homosexuality was no longer illegal. Something an LGBTQ+ person could be imprisoned for.
It's not illegal to be homosexual or trans.
I am talking about the ideology pushed in schools and universities on homosexuality and transgenderism.
Not today -- but it used to be.
LGBTQ+ -- are not an ideology. They are individual people. That apparently don't fit YOUR norm. But they fit theirs,
People expressing who they are -- is that what you object to?
Funny no one mentions the musclebound straight guy in a tight tee or a straight girl in her mini-skirts and crop top flaunting their sexuality.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
Very ridiculous putting an adult's interpretation on something and thinking a child will be thinking the same thing.
It boggles the mind.
You know the TV series Pose. The part where older LGBTQ+ provided "families" for young kids who were either thrown out of their home or had to escape their self-righteous overbearing religious parents?
That is something I never want to hear about ever again.
NO -- parents do not always know what is best or what their kid needs. And a lot of time they are hung up in their own self-righteousness.
Schools were sometimes the only safe place these kids had.
I absolutely support DEI programs 100%.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: Annee
As I stated.
Is this really the intent and laws of the constitution. To ban one group to assemble and silence them, but allow another group to assemble and preach without any challenge to their ideology.
DEI is now the official church and religion of liberal governments to the point its trampling on other’s constitutional rights.
It is because of the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.
Nothing to do with any other club.
How does that Clause extend down to a School and after-school clubs? There must be Precedent?
I posted one lawsuit with link -- that a school district had to pay $200,000.
There are plenty more.
Is precedent not established with these lawsuits?
How did they determine "God" was "religious" or just a name like any other?
You tell me.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: Annee
As I stated.
Is this really the intent and laws of the constitution. To ban one group to assemble and silence them, but allow another group to assemble and preach without any challenge to their ideology.
DEI is now the official church and religion of liberal governments to the point its trampling on other’s constitutional rights.
It is because of the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.
Nothing to do with any other club.
How does that Clause extend down to a School and after-school clubs? There must be Precedent?
I posted one lawsuit with link -- that a school district had to pay $200,000.
There are plenty more.
Is precedent not established with these lawsuits?
How did they determine "God" was "religious" or just a name like any other?
You tell me.
How did The Law determine a difference in order to distinguish?
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
Very ridiculous putting an adult's interpretation on something and thinking a child will be thinking the same thing.
It boggles the mind.
You know the TV series Pose. The part where older LGBTQ+ provided "families" for young kids who were either thrown out of their home or had to escape their self-righteous overbearing religious parents?
That is something I never want to hear about ever again.
NO -- parents do not always know what is best or what their kid needs. And a lot of time they are hung up in their own self-righteousness.
Schools were sometimes the only safe place these kids had.
I absolutely support DEI programs 100%.
Nope never heard of Pose, but I agree with that analysis.
I too support DEI programs especially in schools where children can see that kindness and acceptance of others is something that can happen outside of the home.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
Very ridiculous putting an adult's interpretation on something and thinking a child will be thinking the same thing.
It boggles the mind.
You know the TV series Pose. The part where older LGBTQ+ provided "families" for young kids who were either thrown out of their home or had to escape their self-righteous overbearing religious parents?
That is something I never want to hear about ever again.
NO -- parents do not always know what is best or what their kid needs. And a lot of time they are hung up in their own self-righteousness.
Schools were sometimes the only safe place these kids had.
I absolutely support DEI programs 100%.
Nope never heard of Pose, but I agree with that analysis.
I too support DEI programs especially in schools where children can see that kindness and acceptance of others is something that can happen outside of the home.
If you ever get the chance to watch Pose -- I recommend it.
originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
I would say take them both out to be even, but this school needs God.
11 year olds do not need to be celebrating anything sexual, but of course the perverted think it’s okay.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
Very ridiculous putting an adult's interpretation on something and thinking a child will be thinking the same thing.
It boggles the mind.
You know the TV series Pose. The part where older LGBTQ+ provided "families" for young kids who were either thrown out of their home or had to escape their self-righteous overbearing religious parents?
That is something I never want to hear about ever again.
NO -- parents do not always know what is best or what their kid needs. And a lot of time they are hung up in their own self-righteousness.
Schools were sometimes the only safe place these kids had.
I absolutely support DEI programs 100%.
Nope never heard of Pose, but I agree with that analysis.
I too support DEI programs especially in schools where children can see that kindness and acceptance of others is something that can happen outside of the home.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Annee
Elvis swinging his hips in a suggestive manner, only adults took it that way as I sure didn't as a kid, to me he was just dancing.
I know -- and all the satanic playing records backwards -- ridiculous.
"Let kids be kids" -- it makes me cringe every time I hear that statement.
Very ridiculous putting an adult's interpretation on something and thinking a child will be thinking the same thing.
It boggles the mind.
You know the TV series Pose. The part where older LGBTQ+ provided "families" for young kids who were either thrown out of their home or had to escape their self-righteous overbearing religious parents?
That is something I never want to hear about ever again.
NO -- parents do not always know what is best or what their kid needs. And a lot of time they are hung up in their own self-righteousness.
Schools were sometimes the only safe place these kids had.
I absolutely support DEI programs 100%.
Nope never heard of Pose, but I agree with that analysis.
I too support DEI programs especially in schools where children can see that kindness and acceptance of others is something that can happen outside of the home.
"A Moment in Time" -- had a profound effect on me.
About 8 years ago I was volunteering for playground duty.
The school had installed a "Friend Bench". A bench a kid could go sit on if they felt alone and had no friend. It was like watching a miracle in real time. I watched at least 3 kids go sit on this bench. And within only a few minutes kids that were playing nearby -- went to the bench and invited the "bench kid" to come play with them.
Such a simple concept -- and so profound.
originally posted by: Electriccowboy
originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
I would say take them both out to be even, but this school needs God.
11 year olds do not need to be celebrating anything sexual, but of course the perverted think it’s okay.
Society has failed in so many ways. and to expose 11 yr olds to such garbage as LBGKYU is wrong. Jesus Christ recite the Pledge of Allegient's to the Flag.