Republican Voters Against Trump

originally posted by: BlueBaby1
Our lifetime Republican family members who did vote trump will not vote Republican again, including myself and husband. We are military veterans, lost our clinics under trump, lost my healthcare, couldn't get a disability raise, and 9 members of our family and friends died of covid, they believed they were safe because they believed trump, it will go away in 2 weeks bull#. trump killed them.

originally posted by: Hakaiju
a reply to: Threadbarer

It is just my opinion, but I find it hard to believe anyone who considers themselves Republican or conservative would vote for biden under any circumstances.

You lost your clinics to the US Congressional Majority being D's while Trump was POTUS>

I am calling BS on your post.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
I have a feeling the Florida Supreme Court just created a lot more Republican voters against Trump when they both allowed an anti-abortion law to go into effect but also permitted an abortion protection amendment to appear on the November ballot.

Seriously, Women are worried about other women having "Late term Abortions" that is where the Liberals are proven lunatics.

Late term being banned is not going to lose the R's because the D's have been caught red handed DESTROYING our nation.

Indies don't really vote much. You have to get excited for candidates to vote and most people are going "meh"! The reason they were Indies is because the see "meh"! stuff.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Xtrozero

I disagree. True independents are a small minority of kind of weird people who really don't fit anywhere

At any given time the mix is roughly 30%~ dem, 30% rep, 40%~ independent. I’ll concede much of that independent number are apathetics… but still hardly a minority.

Nixon for example. His record was good, not lackluster

He switched us to fiat. You can look at the national debt and inflation after which to see if that was a good idea.



For the rest I don’t understand why so many people are willing to give Trump a pass. Every president has a crisis they have to navigate. Most fumble and we don’t give them a pass. They signed up for the job which includes hard decisions.

Trump deployed more money than any president in recent history. He accrued more debt in one term than any president in recent history. It’s pretty black and white.

a reply to: Justoneman

6 weeks is not late term. It's impossible for most women to know they're even pregnant at the 6-week mark.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
It's impossible for most women to know they're even pregnant at the 6-week mark.

No. Now most women can know they are pregnant even before they have missed a period.
That's at the 2 week mark.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

And then there are people like me with specific and factual gripes.

Like I said Im not arguing with you on your criticism of him and I agree with you specifically in regards to fiscal responsibility where he failed. That tax break was a joke , building the wall was the most expensive and least effective method to keep illegals out, and when he took office he had full control of congress and they did nothing about obamacare.

However Like I also said the bar is extremely low with congress and politicians in general and trump is the only candidate the system is currently in fear off. The enemy of my enemy is certainly not always my friend , but we have seen what our current enemy has done and is pushing us towards.

I’m not sure we’ll actually benefit from all of that with how abrasive Trump is.

I disagree , I think that is exactly what we need. We need someone to start calling out the BS and ruffling the feathers of the corrupted system. Being nice and playing well with the corrupted system is exactly how we got here.

Romney,Bush,McCain,the GOP , played nice with the corrupted system , even worse they pretented the system (deepstate) didn't exist.

We have reached a point where society and especially corporations,politicians, world leaders ,and global entities such as NATO and WEF need some tough rhetoric and actions put forward against them.

We need that abrasiveness when dealing with the corrupted system we have. Our society and specifically world leaders,politicians, liberals,RINOs, and corporate boards have become like a bunch of bratty kids that have never been corrected or called out for their behavior and lies.

Its time they get called out and given some tough love and feel some push back with some abrasive behavior.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Biden isn’t in good enough health to work at an ace hardware store much less run a country.

But I can’t stress enough how bad both of them are.

Biden appears healthier to me than Trump.

Why do you guys have to constantly lie?

No one believes you actually think that.

Apparently, and I agree. How can they believe lies that hurts themselves in the long run like that would?

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

I don't know a single person voting for RFK Jr. It seems like he's actually drawing more Republican interest. There's a good reason why not a single person in his family are going to be voting for him.

I don’t know a single person voting for Biden.
That means nothing.
There are plenty of fools who will.
RFK jr voters are Biden voters and never trumpers.
Biden loses.
It’s going to be a similar election like when daddy Bush’s votes were siphoned off by a spry Ross Perot in 1992.

My gay friends, well some of them anyway, will vote for Biden. I do know one in particular that would have had enough of his state being overrun with Illegals.

a reply to: FlyersFan

While pregnancy tests can detect HCG as early as 10 days after conception, they're not really accurate until a missed period. Considering the timer doesn't actually start at conception but instead at your last period, a missed period is usually right at 6 weeks, if you're lucky.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FlyersFan

While pregnancy tests can detect HCG as early as 10 days after conception, they're not really accurate until a missed period. Considering the timer doesn't actually start at conception but instead at your last period, a missed period is usually right at 6 weeks, if you're lucky.

My daughter used to have a period -- maybe once every 6 months.

She was told by a doctor she was incapable of getting pregnant.

SURPRISE! She was almost 5 months pregnant before she new she was.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a missed period is usually right at 6 weeks, if you're lucky.

no hun. A missed period is when you are at about 2 weeks pregnant.
You get pregnant in the middle of a cycle .. about day 14.
The period comes at about day 28.
That's two weeks.

ETA Pregnancy is 40 weeks from last period.

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: chr0naut

Trump suggested a prescription for Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to cull coronavirus. That stuff had mine gone within 3 days, faster than a z-pack gets rid of the flu. The media claimed it was a lie and neither of those meds would help you, people were duped into believing the media and caused the shutdown they were hoping for in order to push mail-in ballots.

This country didn't have to stop, it was forced by the democrats and media so you can stop blaming Trump for all that BS when we were hit with a cold virus.

Current recommendation is that if you get COVID-19, you should isolate for 5 days after testing positive:

If you have COVID-19 - New Zealand Ministry of Health.

3 days of symptoms for a mild case is nothing unusual.

When I had COVID-19, the symptoms only lasted three days (but at that stage, the recommended isolation period was a week). My daughter's current partner is isolating right now with COVID-19, and his symptoms were over in two days.

I doubt that Ivermectin and HQC did anything for you except generate expensive pee.

And, as far as the flu goes, current advice is that you will likely have it for 7 days, but if you take a z-pack, it can be gone in as little as a week!

a reply to: FlyersFan

Once again, pregnancy is counted from the time of last period. In an ideal world, a missed period will occur four weeks after your last period. But I'm sure plenty of women on this site can tell you that periods aren't always regular and never ideal.

a reply to: chr0naut

Z-packs don't work on the flu. You mean Tamiflu.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: chr0naut

Z-packs don't work on the flu. You mean Tamiflu.

I was replying to LSU2018's post, where he said that Ivermectin and HQC clears up COVID "faster than a z-pack gets rid of the flu".

And Z-Packs are the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin. Useful for some parasites and bacterial infections, but it doesn't work on viruses like the common cold, flu or COVID-19.

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: chr0naut

Every graph you posted shows a drop after the media and democrats threw this country into a state of panic, and you STILL don't understand why...

SMH

Sure, COVID-19 had an effect. The point is that before that drop, Trump's performance on several indicators (that he boasted about), was fairly average.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: chr0naut

It was 8 months, not even 1 year.

Our Medical Officer told use correctly that covid was BS in Jan of 2020.

The first cities didn't lock down until late March.

Stop lying. You already have zero credibility, stop digging it deeper

He knows more about what we had to deal with in America than we do, even though we dealt with it firsthand and he didn't. It's a liberal thing.

I watched as the world locked down, but for six months Trump kept saying, "it will all go away, it will be like magic".

Six months of Trump's Covid denials: 'It'll go away … It's fading'

... and he cut funding to the WHO, and he ridiculed those states and cities that did lock down, and yet there were daily counts of the COVID-19 mortalities on nearly every news site.

It doesn't take a liberal mindset to see it. It takes a strong delusion to deny it.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: chr0naut

Trump suggested a prescription for Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to cull coronavirus. That stuff had mine gone within 3 days, faster than a z-pack gets rid of the flu. The media claimed it was a lie and neither of those meds would help you, people were duped into believing the media and caused the shutdown they were hoping for in order to push mail-in ballots.

This country didn't have to stop, it was forced by the democrats and media so you can stop blaming Trump for all that BS when we were hit with a cold virus.

Current recommendation is that if you get COVID-19, you should isolate for 5 days after testing positive:

If you have COVID-19 - New Zealand Ministry of Health.

3 days of symptoms for a mild case is nothing unusual.

When I had COVID-19, the symptoms only lasted three days (but at that stage, the recommended isolation period was a week). My daughter's current partner is isolating right now with COVID-19, and his symptoms were over in two days.

I doubt that Ivermectin and HQC did anything for you except generate expensive pee.

And, as far as the flu goes, current advice is that you will likely have it for 7 days, but if you take a z-pack, it can be gone in as little as a week!

There’s a ton of evidence out that shows Ivermectin helped against Covid. Of course with you being a medical dr you know better right?🙄

Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%). Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for “need for mechanical ventilation,” whereas effect estimates for “improvement” and “deterioration” clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

In 18 randomized controlled trials of ivermectin for COVID-19, the drug was reported to play a statistically significant role in reducing viral clearance time, clinical recovery time, and mortality. Additionally, several controlled prophylaxis trials have shown that ivermectin can significantly reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Kory et al. 2021). A recent study by Behera et al. found that oral administration of ivermectin in two doses (300 mcg/kg every 72 h) to healthcare workers as a chemopreventive agent reduced the risk of contracting COVID-19 by 83% over the next month (Behera et al. 2021). Therefore, it may be hypothesized that ivermectin can be used not only for the treatment of COVID-19, but also as a chemopreventive agent for high-risk occupational groups such as healthcare workers and high-risk groups for COVID-19 severity, such as patients with primary diseases such as immunity.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: chr0naut

Trump suggested a prescription for Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to cull coronavirus. That stuff had mine gone within 3 days, faster than a z-pack gets rid of the flu. The media claimed it was a lie and neither of those meds would help you, people were duped into believing the media and caused the shutdown they were hoping for in order to push mail-in ballots.

This country didn't have to stop, it was forced by the democrats and media so you can stop blaming Trump for all that BS when we were hit with a cold virus.

Current recommendation is that if you get COVID-19, you should isolate for 5 days after testing positive:

If you have COVID-19 - New Zealand Ministry of Health.

3 days of symptoms for a mild case is nothing unusual.

When I had COVID-19, the symptoms only lasted three days (but at that stage, the recommended isolation period was a week). My daughter's current partner is isolating right now with COVID-19, and his symptoms were over in two days.

I doubt that Ivermectin and HQC did anything for you except generate expensive pee.

And, as far as the flu goes, current advice is that you will likely have it for 7 days, but if you take a z-pack, it can be gone in as little as a week!

There’s a ton of evidence out that shows Ivermectin helped against Covid. Of course with you being a medical dr you know better right?🙄

Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%). Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for “need for mechanical ventilation,” whereas effect estimates for “improvement” and “deterioration” clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

In 18 randomized controlled trials of ivermectin for COVID-19, the drug was reported to play a statistically significant role in reducing viral clearance time, clinical recovery time, and mortality. Additionally, several controlled prophylaxis trials have shown that ivermectin can significantly reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Kory et al. 2021). A recent study by Behera et al. found that oral administration of ivermectin in two doses (300 mcg/kg every 72 h) to healthcare workers as a chemopreventive agent reduced the risk of contracting COVID-19 by 83% over the next month (Behera et al. 2021). Therefore, it may be hypothesized that ivermectin can be used not only for the treatment of COVID-19, but also as a chemopreventive agent for high-risk occupational groups such as healthcare workers and high-risk groups for COVID-19 severity, such as patients with primary diseases such as immunity.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

When you don't cherry-pick data to include in-vitro massive dose ivermectin studies, or studies of dubious credibility and no peer review, aggregates of many clinical analyses show that Ivermectin performs worse than placebo overall clinically, as either a preventative, or as a treatment for COVID-19.

Table 7b. Ivermectin: Selected Clinical Trial Data - NIH (take note of the Interpretation of each trial).

Additional to that, both Brazil and India distributed Ivermectin to large populations as an attempt to deal with COVID-19. In both countries, the medical advice for treatment of COVID-19 no longer includes use of ivermectin because it proved useless.

Why HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol

The regrettable story of the “Covid Kit” and the “Early Treatment of Covid-19” in Brazil

And, no, I'm not a medical doctor.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FlyersFan

While pregnancy tests can detect HCG as early as 10 days after conception, they're not really accurate until a missed period. Considering the timer doesn't actually start at conception but instead at your last period, a missed period is usually right at 6 weeks, if you're lucky.

My daughter used to have a period -- maybe once every 6 months.

She was told by a doctor she was incapable of getting pregnant.

SURPRISE! She was almost 5 months pregnant before she new she was.

I hope the situation helped you to understand the failures of the medical profession. Misdiagnosing someone so poorly supports that they are not gods that people should follow as if they know everything. Your daughter's Gyno apparently made a mistake. One, that this time didn't cause her to die for example.