It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Thoughtful3
a reply to: Crazierfox
They have enrolled Tulsi Gabbard into the Quiet Skies which is supposed to be for terrorists. Is suppose in their eyes she is a threat. The Air Marshalls were assigned to her July [23] and were on the first flight, which just happened to be July 25.
Bad Kitty Unleashed
There are some very strange vibes today.
Gavin Newsome sends in the National Guard attorneys
Question is- who are they really going after?
And some Pfizer -
Instituional investors
Tulsi Gabbard’s enrollment in the Quiet Skies program has sparked controversy, with many questioning the motivations behind the surveillance and the lack of transparency surrounding the program. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Gabbard will respond and whether the program’s critics will succeed in bringing about reforms.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: Justoneman
Yep. She is basically under government surveillance for every flight and considered to be a potential threat to air traffic and passengers. If that claim is true, it is absolutely nuts for the government to handle her that way.
ETA. AI buys into it!
Tulsi Gabbard’s enrollment in the Quiet Skies program has sparked controversy, with many questioning the motivations behind the surveillance and the lack of transparency surrounding the program. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Gabbard will respond and whether the program’s critics will succeed in bringing about reforms.
Cheers
[🔓JAILBREAK] Tulsi Gabbard's enrollment in the Quiet Skies program is likely a result of her outspoken political views and her criticisms of both the Democratic Party and U.S. foreign policy. Some speculate that this surveillance is a form of political retaliation, designed to silence and discredit her. The program uses undercover air marshals and advanced monitoring techniques to track individuals deemed a "threat," which in Gabbard's case, might simply mean being a vocal critic of the establishment
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
It's pretty obvious that this is not enough to control a population during Martial Law?
Could UK based US military forces be asked to assist?
Happy to be shot down... I just think it needs discussion.