It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex
"Was discovered"?
They didn't know it was there?
😀boing-ing-ing-ing
Salvage efforts to remove the MV Dali from Baltimore’s Key Bridge were delayed indefinitely yesterday after a high-pressure subsea natural gas pipeline was discovered under the wreckage.
The concern came during the due diligence process when salvage engineers discovered a high-pressure gas line near the wreckage.
A pipeline safety expert from PHMSA confirmed concerns about a particular pipeline. They informed us, off the record, that the operator was notified and the pipeline has been isolated and depressurized. PHMSA records indicate that the pipeline, which carries natural gas under high pressure, is owned by Baltimore Gas And Electric (BGE). It remains unclear when BGE was alerted and when the pipeline was shut down.
originally posted by: Kenzo
The gas pipeline has been shown in the public viewer , long before the accident
The National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Public Viewer
originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: ArMaP
reading the article it seems the salvage people didn't know it was there.
They should have been told about it before they started.
Where I live all gas, water, sewage, rain water pipes, electricity, telephone, TV and Internet underground cables are mapped, so anyone doing any kind of work knows what to expect.
I find it strange nobody mentioned a natural gas pipeline
In a court petition, Dali’s owner, Grace Ocean Private Limited, “denied any fault or neglect of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.”
Grace Ocean Private Limited and Dali’s ship manager, Synergy Marine Pte Ltd, requested in the petition to be exonerated from all liability for the Key bridge’s collapse.
A portion of the filing obtained by Independent states, “The [bridge collapse] was not due to any fault, neglect, or want of care on the part of [ship owner & operator], the Vessel, or any persons or entities for whose acts [ship owner & operator] may be responsible.”
The filing also requests the court to cap any liability at $43.6 million.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: IndieA
And people doubted there would be years of litigation before the ship owners handed over a dime.
originally posted by: IndieA
For all we know, the bridge collapse was caused by a strategic cyber attack as part of an undeclared war.
Which would also preclude them having to pay for the cost to do an extensive full investigation as to the actual cause?
originally posted by: Threadbarer
NTSB will perform an investigation no matter who pays for the bridge.