It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: matafuchs
Exactly.
Trump could have dropped a $100 bill out of his wallet and the left would get him for littering.
People are waking up.
56% of Americans see these cases as witch hunts.
That number is increasing.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Vermilion
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: chr0naut
It is a bank, that manages the money of its customers and investors. The customers and investors are the ones who get 'stiffed' in fraud of this type.
The bank did their due diligence and approved the loan.
You’re saying the bank committed fraud as well. Got it. 👍
Well, that's hard to say. The bank officers could well have been complicit in the fraud, but they have plausible deniability. The valuers that the bank engaged were likely to have been complicit with the fraud, and the bank could be unaware that the valuers, or even specific officers of the bank, were crooked.
Phew LoL
That’s some mental gymnastics there buddy!
Well done.
Are you gassed now? You should be.
If there’s any crime here, it’s the bank loaning the money when they shouldn’t, thereby depriving their customers of loan proceeds.
That’s what you’re claiming now?
No, that completely ignores Trump as initiator and prime instigator of the fraud.
And Trump personally has been judged guilty in this case. It's done.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
American banks can borrow from other banks if needed. So there are no "loaned out" banks. Especially the big ones like in the Trump case.
And, the case is not over. No final rulings have been issued. 🤣🤣
originally posted by: matafuchs
I mean, you all talk about what a business loser he is
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
Just came by to read the abysmal responses from our resident socialist sycophants. Not surprised in the slightest.
"Socialism is the gospel of envy, and the creed of ignorance."
-Winston Churchill
It's almost as if they WANT AND NEED to have our lives destroyed, our families ripped apart, our wealth redistributed, our sovereignty eliminated, our strength diminished, our judicial weaponized...
🤔..Oh, wait.....
The commies are upset. They wanted him to have to pay for 2 reasons:
1. He's rich.
2. He hurt their feelings.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
Just came by to read the abysmal responses from our resident socialist sycophants. Not surprised in the slightest.
"Socialism is the gospel of envy, and the creed of ignorance."
-Winston Churchill
It's almost as if they WANT AND NEED to have our lives destroyed, our families ripped apart, our wealth redistributed, our sovereignty eliminated, our strength diminished, our judicial weaponized...
🤔..Oh, wait.....
The commies are upset. They wanted him to have to pay for 2 reasons:
1. He's rich.
2. He hurt their feelings.
And not necessarily in that order.
Some just cannot think after "hate that man DJT". They just can't. We see it here. I have no need for the evil one called Hillary Clinton, but I also don't waste my time on boards where they love her. IF they existed? I suppose I could go see.
originally posted by: Mahogani
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Mahogani
He doesn't owe anybody anything until the case is over.
Right now it's not over, it's just starting. 🤣
Wrong.
He owes $175 million, in the next 10 days, if he wants to appeal. If he does not pay it in 10 days he owes the full $454m plus interest.
If he loses the appeal, he loses the $175 million plus everything else up to the full judgment.
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Mahogani
Thank you for a straight (no drama) factual answer.
Like John Gacey thanking Jeffrey Dahmer for his moral guidance.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Mahogani
Thank you for a straight (no drama) factual answer.
Like John Gacey thanking Jeffrey Dahmer for his moral guidance.
Gacy and Dahmer actually had more morals than the Liberals do.
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
Just came by to read the abysmal responses from our resident socialist sycophants. Not surprised in the slightest.
"Socialism is the gospel of envy, and the creed of ignorance."
-Winston Churchill
It's almost as if they WANT AND NEED to have our lives destroyed, our families ripped apart, our wealth redistributed, our sovereignty eliminated, our strength diminished, our judicial weaponized...
🤔..Oh, wait.....
The commies are upset. They wanted him to have to pay for 2 reasons:
1. He's rich.
2. He hurt their feelings.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Oh...and the fun part of it all is...Trump ALSO just increased his net worth by another $3b to $4b!
Please explain how him selling companies to himself has increases their real value?
It's all funny-money again.
He sold his company to the public.
You don’t understand this ?
He retained 60% ownership, but he could still have purchased some of his shares anonymously through shell companies. As an investment it wasn't worth a fraction of what he is claiming.
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Mahogani
Thank you for a straight (no drama) factual answer.
Like John Gacey thanking Jeffrey Dahmer for his moral guidance.
Gacy and Dahmer actually had more morals than the Liberals do.
I heard Dahmer was eating Five Guys before it was cool.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Vermilion
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: chr0naut
It is a bank, that manages the money of its customers and investors. The customers and investors are the ones who get 'stiffed' in fraud of this type.
The bank did their due diligence and approved the loan.
You’re saying the bank committed fraud as well. Got it. 👍
Well, that's hard to say. The bank officers could well have been complicit in the fraud, but they have plausible deniability. The valuers that the bank engaged were likely to have been complicit with the fraud, and the bank could be unaware that the valuers, or even specific officers of the bank, were crooked.
Phew LoL
That’s some mental gymnastics there buddy!
Well done.
Are you gassed now? You should be.
If there’s any crime here, it’s the bank loaning the money when they shouldn’t, thereby depriving their customers of loan proceeds.
That’s what you’re claiming now?
No, that completely ignores Trump as initiator and prime instigator of the fraud.
And Trump personally has been judged guilty in this case. It's done.
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Vermilion
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: chr0naut
It is a bank, that manages the money of its customers and investors. The customers and investors are the ones who get 'stiffed' in fraud of this type.
The bank did their due diligence and approved the loan.
You’re saying the bank committed fraud as well. Got it. 👍
Well, that's hard to say. The bank officers could well have been complicit in the fraud, but they have plausible deniability. The valuers that the bank engaged were likely to have been complicit with the fraud, and the bank could be unaware that the valuers, or even specific officers of the bank, were crooked.
Phew LoL
That’s some mental gymnastics there buddy!
Well done.
Are you gassed now? You should be.
If there’s any crime here, it’s the bank loaning the money when they shouldn’t, thereby depriving their customers of loan proceeds.
That’s what you’re claiming now?
No, that completely ignores Trump as initiator and prime instigator of the fraud.
And Trump personally has been judged guilty in this case. It's done.
So, I’m guessing you don’t know this ….. Trump is “judged guilty” by literally, no schite, not kidding, no joke …… 2 people.
Both of whom have expressed publicly that they despise Trump. Said that they were going to get him.
Absolutely with body language and verbiage in the courtroom, telegraph their hate.
Apparently NY laws are somehow malleable to allow this.
You don’t have the wherewithal to admit that this is wrong ? If it somehow benefits your agenda / team, you just say “hahahahaha” ?
You don’t understand that this is wrong ?
You don’t know that rational people know this is wrong in any situation, regardless of anybody’s leanings ?
I really wish you would get honest on this. For your benefit.