Justice Department Launches the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: xuenchen

Question - Who Exactly Deems People Incompetent and Dangerous ? Could this not by it's Looks become a Tyranny besides being Unconstitutional ?

With the way things are rigged today who knows!

But it sure could easily become "weaponized" like the rest of The DOJ is 😧

a reply to: xuenchen
Being the government, they will have access to the records of who owns guns (in states where they have to be registered if you own a gun) and info of buyers. I'm sure the record-keeping will go beyond that basic aspect and ammo purchases, outside of the framework of the law will be collected from cc sources and other transactions.

When the tough times come as the public starts to recognize that the ETs are running the NWO show, the abandoning of borders by stable governments, the stupid "climate change" agenda, and, actually, about the whole show, then the dire need for confiscation of weapon from the public will happen. The time will come for wholesale running in the streets, but you will be carrying baseball bats and leaf rakes.

(Do you know that Commentary doesn't want to recognize the abbreviation of "NWO"?)

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: glen200376

Quote the 2nd Amendment, highlight the part of it that limits what people can do, and then highlight the part that limits what the government can do.

That limits what AMERICAN people can do , American Citizens for that matter .

You know I love ATS but mate Members like yourself and others make me sick to my stomach to the point I cant spend much time on ATS .

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: VariedcodeSole

Looks like California allows gun ownership and has a fairly easy process to get a CCW. So I'm not sure what you're referring to.

Obviously you've never heard of the California assault weapons ban, magazine ban or the California handgun roster.

But by all means please continue to bury yourself in that warm and cozy apathy and willful ignorance you're so fond of ..🙄

a reply to: ICanHold3

Answer the question

www.justice.gov...

ERPO laws, which are modeled off domestic violence protection orders, create a civil process allowing law enforcement, family members (in most states), and medical professionals or other groups (in some states) to petition a court to temporarily prohibit someone at risk of harming themselves or others from purchasing and possessing firearms for the duration of the order.

Now I don't understand why family members would be able to do this. Doesn't make sense because a lot of times, family members can just exist to cause problems for you. If a psychiatrist had said that Nashville trans shooter at the elementary school was cuckoo for coco puffs and shouldn't be able to buy a gun though, I would agree with it so I don't know what to say. Some people are in fact nuts and shouldn't own guns. You guys are making it about somehow illegal immigrants which yeah they're criminals, they're not buying from a legit gun dealer they're buying from the guy they bought their fake documents from. That has nothing to do with this.

What concerns me is the possibility of a vindictive family member or even abusive spouse being able to remove your means of self defense based on statements made in court about you.

Biden-Garland cancelled the program saving the lives of minorities. Operation LeGend.

Evil racist scum!

a reply to: xuenchen

and just how many children today saw psychiatrist
through school or health provider? 80%?

how many took zoloft for depression, or anti-psychotics
that they prescribe for NEARLY EVERYTHING including PAIN
add, adhd meds? anti-anxiety?
most likely caused by BOREDOM, and too much SUGAR (in children)

so for most people its just a matter of ONE (1) BAD DAY
police get called, guns seized, and AMMO GETS KEPT
(no matter how much you bought)
but this bill they keep ALL your guns too

and if you are parent who complaines about school, or teachers,
WATCH OUT corrupt officials and fbi collaborate
and keep dossiers ON YOU, now you are on a list, to be watched
AS A TERRORIST (in texas at least)

a reply to: Shoshanna

"What concerns me is the possibility of a vindictive family member or even abusive spouse being able to remove your means of self defense based on statements made in court about you. "

like ex wives in divorce court vindictive?
where her lawyer says make stuff up for protection order,
because daddy is a-hole with a hore

a reply to: CosmicFocus

"Being the government, they will have access to the records of who owns guns (in states where they have to be registered if you own a gun) "

like in movie RED-DAWN (original movie)
that was the FIRST THING the russian invaders did,
went to police stations for lists of gun owners to collect them

We all know any post on social media that might be construed as threatening gun violence and voila! You are now on their dangerous person list. No gun or ammo purchases, no permit of any kind and eventual confiscation assisted by psychological profiles using a very wide net to make sure anyone who has so much as contemplated using firearms in an illegal manner is tagged and bagged.

originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: xuenchen
When the tough times come as the public starts to recognize that the ETs are running the NWO show, the abandoning of borders by stable governments, the stupid "climate change" agenda, and, actually, about the whole show, then the dire need for confiscation of weapon from the public will happen. The time will come for wholesale running in the streets, but you will be carrying baseball bats and leaf rakes.

(Do you know that Commentary doesn't want to recognize the abbreviation of "NWO"?)

You're all over the place here, aliens, climate change, 2nd amendment changes? I will give you a standing ovation for putting all of that in one paragragh. Amazing!

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: xuenchen

Question - Who Exactly Deems People Incompetent and Dangerous ? Could this not by it's Looks become a Tyranny besides being Unconstitutional ?

With the way things are rigged today who knows!

But it sure could easily become "weaponized" like the rest of The DOJ is 😧

In that Case..............

a reply to: xuenchen

Welcome to the slippery slope department of the government.

First it'll be the obviously crazy people
Then it'll be those that might beat up their spouse
Then it'll be people that start arguments in stores
Then it'll be people that don't like self checkouts
Then it'll be people that post "disinformation" on the internet
Then it'll be people that litter
Then it'll be people that wear clashing clothes

a reply to: CosmicFocus

When the tough times come as the public starts to recognize that the ETs are running the NWO show, the abandoning of borders by stable governments, the stupid "climate change" agenda, and, actually, about the whole show, then the dire need for confiscation of weapon from the public will happen. The time will come for wholesale running in the streets, but you will be carrying baseball bats and leaf rakes.

Not me. I'll have a bat and my little friend. A S&W 9mm.

originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: nugget1

Anyone that trusts this government to act in the citizen's best interests needs their heads examined. They are delusional!

You're too kind! The gov. isn't dillusional, they're pure, self-serving evil.

I'm hard pressed to think of anything being done by our gov. that's in the best interests of the citizens-and future generations. The last three years have been the most abismal of my lifetime, but if BAMN works in November I have absolute confidence it will get worse.

I think a lot anout the future generation, but will they even know what was lost? Do the youth in China know how bad their life is or what it is they instinctually long for? Perhaps they will be ok until Mother Nature rids herself of the parasites that are killing her.

originally posted by: Astrocometus
Answer the question

Give me a reason why they are coming.

a reply to: ICanHold3

Consider it a hypothetical question that you're afraid to answer.

originally posted by: Astrocometus
a reply to: ICanHold3

Answer the question

Perhaps you should answer the Fifty replies to you first mate

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Fifty? You must be a great exaggerater?