Hur on the Hill--Former SC Testifies on Biden Classified Doc Report LIVE

a reply to: FlyersFan

And what did he have to say about those topics?

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: CarlLaFong

The word innocent, however, appears multiple times.

So do plenty of other words.
Context usually matters.

By his own words under oath today: Hur's report did NOT say it "exonerated" Biden.

Crazy how Hur told Gaetz that Biden lied to him.
I wonder how they’ll try and spin that.🤡

These F’in hack Democrats are really something else.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FlyersFan

It was a five hour deposition. Nobody is going to be 100% on the entire time, but Biden came across as fluid, lucid, and good natured.

Wow, you will literally say anything, and never be embarrassed. Even when you should run away and hide forever in shame. It’s just hard to comprehend when you do this.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
And what did he have to say about those topics?

Hur will answer that for you -
PBS

“Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” Hur wrote.

and why they didn't recommend to prosecute .... because they didn't think they'd get a conviction because of Bidens memory and how he'd present himself as an elderly man with poor memory. It wasn't because he was 'innocent'.

“Given Mr. Biden’s limited precision and recall during his interviews with his ghostwriter and with our office, jurors may hesitate to place too much evidentiary weight on a single eight-word utterance to his ghostwriter about finding classified documents in Virginia, in the absence of other, more direct evidence.”

“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” investigators wrote.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

I like the sequence where they bring some Trump recording in and he basically can't remember anything.(; Is this actually still politics? And what does it do for the citizens, apart from squandering their tax money on such hearings? But it is quite interesting because it shows the lack of substance of the accusations quite clearly.

originally posted by: malte86
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I like the sequence where they bring some Trump recording in and he basically can't remember anything.(; Is this actually still politics? And what does it do for the citizens, apart from squandering their tax money on such hearings? But it is quite interesting because it shows the lack of substance of the accusations quite clearly.

Of course you like that part but we are talking about Biden and his real crimes here, not Trump and his Dem manufactured crimes.

Try to keep up.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: malte86
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I like the sequence where they bring some Trump recording in and he basically can't remember anything.(; Is this actually still politics? And what does it do for the citizens, apart from squandering their tax money on such hearings? But it is quite interesting because it shows the lack of substance of the accusations quite clearly.

Of course you like that part but we are talking about Biden and his real crimes here, not Trump and his Dem manufactured crimes.

Try to keep up.

well, that was part of the hearing. it's supposed to say: people forget things. i myself have a hard time remembering birthdays and i'm not an grandpa.

Earlier on, when talking about justice, it was brought up that under the law "All are treated equally"

So it doesn't matter how old or demented one is. This needs to go to trial. Let the jury decide.

originally posted by: malte86
well, that was part of the hearing. it's supposed to say: people forget things. i myself have a hard time remembering birthdays and i'm not an grandpa.

Biden did more than just forget when his son died.

Biden forgot the year Beau died, when Trump was elected and said 'I don't recall', 'I don't remember' and 'I have no goddam idea' more than 100 TIMES, damning transcript of Robert Hur interview reveals

a reply to: FlyersFan

You may want to re-read the report. Every section concludes that there is insufficient evidence that Biden willfully retained classified documents.

a reply to: Hakaiju

It is up to prosecutor to determine if they have enough evidence to secure an indictment. Hur concluded that evidence was lacking on all accounts.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FlyersFan

You may want to re-read the report. Every section concludes that there is insufficient evidence that Biden willfully retained classified documents.

You are making the lying, con artist Democrats very proud today but we see right through your deflections.

"My team and I conducted a thorough, independent investigation," Hur testified.
"We identified evidence that the President willfully retained classified materials after the end of his vice presidency, when he was a private citizen."

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: RazorV66

We conclude that the evidence is insufficient to meet the government's burden. In accordance with the Justice Manual, because we do not believe the government is likely to obtain a conviction at trial, we decline prosecution.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
You may want to re-read the report. Every section concludes that there is insufficient evidence that Biden willfully retained classified documents.

I gave you Hurs direct statement.
He said that Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified information.
I think he knows the report better than you or I synopsizing it.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Nadler opening statement saying Biden was found totally innocent...but Trump is totally guilty.
Trump Trump Trump.

I thought COVID-19 would have gotten to Jerry nadler for sure. He's proof that it wasn't a bad condition for 98% of the population.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: RazorV66

We conclude that the evidence is insufficient to meet the government's burden. In accordance with the Justice Manual, because we do not believe the government is likely to obtain a conviction at trial, we decline prosecution.

Insufficient to meet the government's burden is NOT the same as saying that he didn't willfully retain and disclose classified information. It clearly says that he did. But the level of proof isn't there for a conviction.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: RazorV66

We conclude that the evidence is insufficient to meet the government's burden. In accordance with the Justice Manual, because we do not believe the government is likely to obtain a conviction at trial, we decline prosecution.

But the fact remains and it’s one that you tried to lie about, Biden DID willfully retain classified documents.

Interesting. So he feels that a reasonable person would have convicted Biden.


NY POST - Reasonable juror could have voted to convict president, special counsel affirms

Although Hur concluded in his report that a jury might be sympathetic to President Biden's diminished mental state and therefore declined to press charges, the special counsel admitted Tuesday that it isn't inconceivable a jury would have found the president guilty of a crime.

Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) asked Hur if "a reasonable juror could have voted to convict based on the facts."

"Correct," Hur said.

a reply to: WeMustCare

I agree I tested positive and for 3-4 days I was a little more achy than a normal cold

imagine being proud of operation warpspeed and bringing such an unnessecary vaccine to the public, idiot politicians in every country