Just Breaking SCOTUS Rules Trump Is Eligible To Be On Colorado Ballot.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I can't watch tv right now, but I'm betting MSNBC and CNN are having a meltdown.

you know they are and that angry young man.... ah woman is lining up every fowl mouth sh@@ spewing dem woke conservite hating speaker and analyst she can right now for her show.

originally posted by: arcticshuffle

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: Threadbarer


how is the headline Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor in Colorado case, says states can't remove him from ballots when everybody and their brother knows what the case was about. man talk about not admitting your wrong and trying to spin something.

The baby-ness these days is off the charts.

This is how everyone who’s not a loony leftist is literally Hitler. And how even the smallest GOP / conservative win is ending democracy.

When did we go careening into Sillyville, Infantland ?

in March of 2016 in NC. that was when the portal to Clown World was opened, and we started down this silly path wearing the big red shoes and the cool red nose. It was the moment HB2 was passed. The swift and immediate rush to make children switch genders was on, and if you thought that was in any way wrong, you became an ism. Honk Honk.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: BernnieJGato

Except the ruling makes it very clear that Trump, or anyone else running for federal office, could be prohibited from appearing on a ballot by a Congressional act.

The fact that SCOTUS went out of their way to state that's the only way someone can be removed from a ballot by way of Section 3 caused two separate concurring opinions to be written pointing out how that feel outside the scope of the case.

Yes, section 5 of the 14th amendment exists.

As does an adopted law by congress for insurrection.


Why is this still not sinking in?

a reply to: Threadbarer

nobody has ever said different except that it has to be proven by in court, documents, or records and then it is a federal matter not a states.

just stop your attempts at spin and admit your wrong. but we all know you want do that.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

I think that's an apt overview.


More subtly is the tactics of using standards that they don't hold themselves to (values and morals etc). Mob rule with the aid of certain MSM propaganda is another.

Must be Evelyn Woodhead Sped Redding Course.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Threadbarer

I was just pointing out that the headline claiming someone couldn't be removed from the ballot is incorrect.

The thread title doesn't say nor suggest that.

Schools in Democrat cities do have awful reading comprehension scores.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

The article you used in your OP makes that claim right in the headline. Which all I've been doing in this thread is pointing out that the headline is wrong.

a reply to: Threadbarer

ANTI-DEMOCRACY DEMOCRATS STYMIED BY SCOTUS RULING IN FAVOR OF VOTERS

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Just wait, they haven't even gotten their fake talking points about states' rights yet. I love when they demonstrate that they don't have even the slightest understanding of states' rights.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: BernnieJGato

The article you used in your OP makes that claim right in the headline. Which all I've been doing in this thread is pointing out that the headline is wrong.

Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor in Colorado case, says states can't remove him from ballots

Except it doesn't because it states clearly in the context of the Colorado case.


Just take your L guy.

a reply to: arcticshuffle

I’m heading over to Democratic Underground to read their squalling and screaming.

I predict much material about Trump blackmailing all the justices or maybe just paying them or perhaps threatening their families.

Probably some grumbling about the 3 leftists being compromised. But they’ll love them again tomorrow when they vote anew for communism and perversion.

It’s one of my guilty pleasures. I love viewing these people who have nothing in their lives besides their internet gathering of anger, hate, and “literally shaking !”. A lot of them boast about disowning, or being disowned by, their families. “Because of nazi conservatives” in the family.

It’s like a zoo filled with exotic versions of the worst people on earth that you could imagine.

Wonder if some ATS folks are all-stars over there.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Ladies and Gentlemen , introducing the Next President of these United States.... Donald J. Trump !


Ahhhh , Lets get Ready To Rumble !








............

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
a reply to: Threadbarer

ANTI-DEMOCRACY DEMOCRATS STYMIED BY SCOTUS RULING IN FAVOR OF VOTERS

Democrats assaulted by democracy yet again.

a reply to: Threadbarer



We know you and your comrades are upset when the Constitution is upheld against commie shenanigans.

I'm sure emotional support groups are already being formed for you.

a reply to: Threadbarer

The article you used in your OP makes that claim right in the headline. Which all I've been doing in this thread is pointing out that the headline is wrong.

again it isn't " a bit misleading" or "wrong" and i ask one more time, other than being a complete idiot or been on mars and not getting any news about why CO used the pretext they used and did and trump appealed it, how is it misleading or wrong?

your just not going to give on the spin are you. it's a fact that trump appealed the ban by CO. because he has not been proven to be a insurrectionist and that it is a federal matter.

I've got CNN on. Watching them try to act like this was no surprise, as if their "experts" haven't been trying to assure their viewers for months that Colorado's case had merit

They might not be shocked that they lost but they're shocked it was 9-0. They feel betrayed by the Democrat justices that didn't toe the party line.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Utt Oh , This Lib just heard the News from his Jail Cell..........

For those interested in the actual wording of the ruling, you can go here to read it. If you don't want to wade through how they arrived at their decision, see page 6.

The ruling is that states have no constitutional authority to enforce section 3 on federal offices, especially the presidency.

Warning: The link opens a PDF on the SCOTUS website.

The funny part is the spin is "Oh this isn't that big of a deal, everyone knew this was coming, this was the obvious ruling" in an attempt to hide their disappointment.

The problem with that spin is that it makes it pretty obvious that the Colorado effort was purely an attempt at election interference. If it's so obvious this wasn't legal, you can't turn around and argue Colorado had a legitimate legal disagreement about their ability to do this.

Democrats tried to illegally interfere in the election.

Of course THAT was the actual obvious part that we all knew from the start.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

I'd go even further and argue that by not holding anyone accountable nor culpable this will happen again, in a more extreme matter.

Further indicated by the fact that Colorado's supreme court allowed for this chicanery and that SCOTUS had to rule gave it all that much more legitimacy to those extremists.