Trump Must Pay Half a Billion Dollars Before He Can Appeal New York Decision

originally posted by: FlyersFan
See ... this doesn't make sense to me. I'm not a lawyer or anything but I'd think that the appeal would come first and then, if the appeal fails, you pay the money. Not the other way around.

Not in an actual dictatorship. They can do anything they want. Notice all the Demokrats being prosecuted.

originally posted by: SilentSaturn1
I gave up on Q after it said Hillary, Obama and others would all be arrested very soon back in 2016/2017.

Don't be so quick as to ignore other meanings of "arrested"...

arrest verb [T] (STOP) "to stop or interrupt the development of something"

Q post #1:

Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017

Maybe someone knew something was happening regarding her at this specific date and time window.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

You are not answering #. You are parroting the MSM and the AG. Use some f'n common sense if you have it.

In any civil case of the size you have 3 questions.

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

NONE of you can answer this. Again do not want to hear the statue used because it has NEVER been used like this.

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

I will ask over and over and over and over and could care less what you think. You call it groundhogs day with NO response..

Who is the victim?
Who should be compensated?
What actual law was broken?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Oh. Will she release the Kraken?

No , she will Release the LAW . The Law that says when People Conspire to commit Criminals Acts , they are Tried , Convicted , or Sued into Poverty . The LAW Never goes Away.....

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: Irishhaf
funny thing is, why cant he use the same properties in New York as collateral probably from the same banks that said they were paid back in full to get the money to appeal and then get 100% of the cash back when the appeal overturns the decision.

He can’t get a loan in nyc for 3 years.

Duetsche bank isnt a NYC bank, nothing to prevent him from filing somewhere else with his properties that he currently owns as collateral.

a reply to: Irishhaf


I dont think Deutsche Bank has any desire to do business with Trump anymore





How Trump Fooled Deutsche Bank

a reply to: matafuchs

There doesn't have to be a victim as I have repeatedly told you.

Read the judgment.

I have looked but cannot find what law trump was charged with. Does it have a name or legal designation? I am curious when it was enacted and it's genesis.

Nvm found it.

a reply to: matafuchs

The State of New York
The State of New York
Executive Law 63, Section 12

Of course all of this has been said multiple times in this thread.

originally posted by: Irishhaf

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: Irishhaf
funny thing is, why cant he use the same properties in New York as collateral probably from the same banks that said they were paid back in full to get the money to appeal and then get 100% of the cash back when the appeal overturns the decision.

He can’t get a loan in nyc for 3 years.

Duetsche bank isnt a NYC bank, nothing to prevent him from filing somewhere else with his properties that he currently owns as collateral.

I think the ruling pertains to banks that are chartered or even registered in NY.
NY is the financial hub of the world so most fit in there either way.
Besides, do you think a bank would risk issuing Trump a bond knowing that NY can and will go after them like they went after Trump?
That corrupt judge really did a number on NY businesses by setting that precedent.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: matafuchs

There doesn't have to be a victim as I have repeatedly told you.

Read the judgment.

Does it say in the judgement who gets the money?

a reply to: matafuchs

Parotting?!!!

"Sqawk! Who's the victim? Who's the victim? Who's the victim?"

a reply to: Vermilion

I don't think so and I don't know.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: matafuchs

The State of New York
The State of New York
Executive Law 63, Section 12

Of course all of this has been said multiple times in this thread.

regardless of any legal factors involved, do you honestly think this is a fair and correct ruling?

a reply to: Vermilion

"Besides, do you think a bank would risk issuing Trump a bond knowing that NY can and will go after them like they went after Trump?"

How?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: matafuchs

The State of New York
The State of New York
Executive Law 63, Section 12

Of course all of this has been said multiple times in this thread.

regardless of any legal factors involved, do you honestly think this is a fair and correct ruling?

If it wasn’t Trump, New York would be burned and looted already.

a reply to: network dude

I think it's consistent with other rulings that used this law.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I think it's consistent with other rulings that used this law.

The New York Times agreed that it could not find a single case in history where this statute was used against an individual or a company that did not commit a criminal offense, go bankrupt, or leave financial victims.

Please tell us all why you “think it’s consistent with other rulings that used this law.”

a reply to: Vermilion

Please tell us all why you “think it’s consistent with other rulings that used this law.”

That’s what they told them to say in the 4AM DNC propaganda conference call.

As I said in my previous post, if this was anyone but Trump, NY would be burned and looted already by BLM etc.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Who is the victim and where is the money going? I will continue to say it because you have no real answer. There is not one.