It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IndieA
Genocide is not the answer to terrorism.
originally posted by: IndieA
Come on man, Bebe has the civilian to terrorist kill ratio down below 1:1. (Sarcasm)
Israel kills more terrorists than civilians, Netanyahu claims
Israel is now killing more Hamas militants than civilians in Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed in an interview with American media on Sunday.
His remarks came as the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) was preparing a ground assault of the overcrowded city of Rafah in southern Gaza.
"We’ve brought down the civilian-to-terrorist casualties, the ratio down, to below 1-to-1, which is considerably less than in any other theater of similar warfare. And we’re going to do more,” Netanyahu pledged.
Genocide is not the answer to terrorism.
originally posted by: network dude
By not calling for them to surrender, but rather for Israel to stop, makes it look like folks are on the HAMAS side of all this. If it's truly in the name of peace for the Palestinians, then the international communities, should be calling on HAMAS to end this. Unless it really is about the joos.
originally posted by: Unseendimension
Israel wants to take Gaza, because there are vast Natural Gas deposits there.
That is why this happened and with a “Terror Attack”
between “Hamas”
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: network dude
so it's the joos fault that the joos were attacked because or both reasons and history. I expected nothing less from you.
Funnily enough that's the response I was expecting from you , ignorance is bliss so I hear .... enjoy.
originally posted by: Lovelyldy
Re read my posts if you guys want the answer . All you people arguing and not a lick of sense between any of y’all . 30,000 to 1500 . Someone’s obliterating the other side
originally posted by: PeelingOnions
a reply to: network dude
That doesn't seem to change much tho, we're still running around demanding capitulations and ethnic cleansings.
War it is then?
No they haven't. “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part"
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
originally posted by: crayzeed
Before you answer that question think on this:- one mans rebel fighter is another mans freedom fighter. But, from the freedom fighters perspective there has to be some small or large chance of winning (Hamas has none) if not you are just causing misery and death to your people. So what do you do? What you do not do is keep on with these terrorist attacks and try to talk a settlement, if not your belligerence will get all your people killed.