Are you a BAMN never Trumper? And is that a bad thing?

First off, what is a BAMN never Trumper? BAMN is By Any Means Necessary. Meaning, there really is no limit to what could be done to remove this guy, as long as he's removed. Rules, laws, justice, is completely secondary to the core goal of removing Trump. Now I can totally see how folks would not like him. it's obvious most of his supporters don't "like" him. They like and support his policies. His personality, well, he's a dick. But so are many politicians, most of them smile and lie good enough that they seem much less dickish.

But once you identify yourself as a BAMN never Trumper, what then? Do you still get to pretend you have a moral compass on other topics? Or do you really need to reconcile the part where you are willing to ignore anything in order to get what you want? LOL, that all kind of depends on your moral compass. (a true conundrum) Keeping in mind this is just an opinion, how would someone with a firm moral compass be OK with using the court system to remove a political opponent? It seems that if that's really the case, the two ideas are in conflict with each other.

If you doubt the part where the court system has been weaponized against Trump, you really haven't been paying attention and have no business pretending to he honorable. 91 charges with 4 different indictments. Hell, NY made a new law just so a woman who claims Trump jumped her and raped her in a department store years ago could sue him, since the statute of limitations was long gone and he needed to be humiliated and bled of his cash BAMN. He's been charged and found guilty of fraud before the trial began, and his fraud was to do business in real estate. To date, Trump is the only person to be charged with this crime in NYC. He had to be done in, BAMN.

But what can you do if you hate Trump with every fiber of your being, you loath him more than you loath death itself. He makes you visible and physically ill just by existing. Do you jump on the "get Trump" bandwagon? If you can disregard what's fair you can. Fair. What would fair look like? Perhaps in the United States of America, it would look like people running political campaigns, sharing their vision for the future, and allowing the voters to decide. Maybe if the people really want the guy you can't stand, then the system we have in place should be what we follow.

Of course this is meant to prove a point. And I am biased in that I am someone who considers himself a conservative, and liked the results of Trump's ideas, but didn't like the personality and the stupid (punching down) he did often. (whomever used that earlier, thanks, it's a great way to describe this). In the future, do those of you who cheer this on, think you will be equally as fine with all this if the tables were turned? If it was a candidate you liked? A party you align with? I sure hope so. Because once something like this happens, it becomes "the new normal". And while it's anything but normal, and anyone with even a shred of dignity and integrity should never be in favor of things like this, it will probably happen again and again. Much like the idea of court packing the SCOTUS. If Biden was to appoint three new judges and bring the total to 12 rather than 9, he will win the battle today. But tomorrow, another battel will happen. And when the opposing side is in power, they will make it 15. And the cycle will continue until the high court is much like a very poorly delivered joke about a dead French leader.

So in conclusion, there are some words of wisdom that have helped guide me through my life, and I'll offer them here for anyone to read.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

Are you just writing fiction at this point? What version of reality are you living in that any of this makes sense in your head? Seriously it's concerning

originally posted by: network dude
First off, what is a BAMN never Trumper? BAMN is By Any Means Necessary. Meaning, there really is no limit to what could be done to remove this guy, as long as he's removed. Rules, laws, justice, is completely secondary to the core goal of removing Trump. Now I can totally see how folks would not like him. it's obvious most of his supporters don't "like" him. They like and support his policies. His personality, well, he's a dick. But so are many politicians, most of them smile and lie good enough that they seem much less dickish.

But once you identify yourself as a BAMN never Trumper, what then? Do you still get to pretend you have a moral compass on other topics? Or do you really need to reconcile the part where you are willing to ignore anything in order to get what you want? LOL, that all kind of depends on your moral compass. (a true conundrum) Keeping in mind this is just an opinion, how would someone with a firm moral compass be OK with using the court system to remove a political opponent? It seems that if that's really the case, the two ideas are in conflict with each other.

If you doubt the part where the court system has been weaponized against Trump, you really haven't been paying attention and have no business pretending to he honorable. 91 charges with 4 different indictments. Hell, NY made a new law just so a woman who claims Trump jumped her and raped her in a department store years ago could sue him, since the statute of limitations was long gone and he needed to be humiliated and bled of his cash BAMN. He's been charged and found guilty of fraud before the trial began, and his fraud was to do business in real estate. To date, Trump is the only person to be charged with this crime in NYC. He had to be done in, BAMN.

But what can you do if you hate Trump with every fiber of your being, you loath him more than you loath death itself. He makes you visible and physically ill just by existing. Do you jump on the "get Trump" bandwagon? If you can disregard what's fair you can. Fair. What would fair look like? Perhaps in the United States of America, it would look like people running political campaigns, sharing their vision for the future, and allowing the voters to decide. Maybe if the people really want the guy you can't stand, then the system we have in place should be what we follow.

Of course this is meant to prove a point. And I am biased in that I am someone who considers himself a conservative, and liked the results of Trump's ideas, but didn't like the personality and the stupid (punching down) he did often. (whomever used that earlier, thanks, it's a great way to describe this). In the future, do those of you who cheer this on, think you will be equally as fine with all this if the tables were turned? If it was a candidate you liked? A party you align with? I sure hope so. Because once something like this happens, it becomes "the new normal". And while it's anything but normal, and anyone with even a shred of dignity and integrity should never be in favor of things like this, it will probably happen again and again. Much like the idea of court packing the SCOTUS. If Biden was to appoint three new judges and bring the total to 12 rather than 9, he will win the battle today. But tomorrow, another battel will happen. And when the opposing side is in power, they will make it 15. And the cycle will continue until the high court is much like a very poorly delivered joke about a dead French leader.

So in conclusion, there are some words of wisdom that have helped guide me through my life, and I'll offer them here for anyone to read.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

a reply to: network dude

They justify it because they're trying to. . . SaVE OuR deMoCracY.

a reply to: network dude

Few people are going to admit they are a "BAMN never Trumper", except maybe Sam Harris. They are going to tell you what a criminal Donald is, and the fact that you can't see it makes you dense, or at the very least, mis-dis-informed. Here, have some Kool-Aid.

So, is being "BAMN never Trumper" a problem? Yes, it has opened the door that much farther for the Marxists to seize control of this country from the inside out and create a mass psychosis among those who are already susceptible to it.

a reply to: Klassified

amazingly enough, this isn't even about if he's guilty of any crimes. It's about using that aspect of this to deny him the ability to run for office. If that's fair, then I just don't get it and need it explained.

It's always a bad thing when someone decides they are right and they want to get their way by any means necessary.

a reply to: network dude

He'd be a tyrant and usurp the current tyrant in power!

a reply to: mechtech87

your opposition to rational thought is noted. But just so you know how things work here, name calling with no substance kind of make you look like the douchewaffle in the room. If you bring an argument or at the very least, discuss the facts or thoughts you disagree with, that would be considered "a conversation", what you did is vomit some stupid up. Care to try again?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

He'd be a tyrant and usurp the current tyrant in power!

Yep, he is a threat to THEIR version of democracy, not ours.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

He'd be a tyrant and usurp the current tyrant in power!

Yep, he is a threat to THEIR version of democracy, not ours.

"Our Republic is a threat to their democracy".
-JinMI

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Klassified

amazingly enough, this isn't even about if he's guilty of any crimes. It's about using that aspect of this to deny him the ability to run for office. If that's fair, then I just don't get it and need it explained.

They can't explain it. That's part of the mass psychosis I was talking about. When you have a "leader" suffering from dementia, his base begins to share in those delusions and demented moments to ease the dissonance. "Fair" is not part of that equation.

a reply to: Klassified

it's troubling to see posters that have showed intelligence in the past, argue from emotion to this level and sound so silly. cheering on totalitarianism just isn't a good look on anyone.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Klassified

it's troubling to see posters that have showed intelligence in the past, argue from emotion to this level and sound so silly. cheering on totalitarianism just isn't a good look on anyone.

They don't see it as totalitarianism, and even if it is, it's necessary and right, because "democracy".

It's even a worse look when other countries start using the POTUS as a poster child...


Disclaimer: Several sources I have found claim this is real, but decide for yourself. It's still funny either way, and drives home the point.

B.A.M.N. is by definition an extremist group that by its very name is about going beyond all normal channels of political action. It doesn't need to apply strictly to destroying Donald Trump on every level, it can easily be applied to anything, any person or thing that gets in the way of the Socialist Democrats and their established network of power and corruption. Laws and accepted procedures are not considered when you employ the motto "By All Means Necessary" to reach your goals. The corruption and lack of moral considerations are classic hallmarks of the Socialist Democrat M.O. and this "BAMN" credo proves that IMO.

a reply to: Klassified

when humor hits this close to home, it's both funny and sad. We have to live here.

a reply to: network dude
I can't vote for Trump, if I could I would have, but we have our own Trump and I voted for him and he has the same funny hair too

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

He'd be a tyrant and usurp the current tyrant in power!

Yep, he is a threat to THEIR version of democracy, not ours.

"Our Republic is a threat to their democracy".
-JinMI

Exhibit A in the thread about Kari Lake -

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis

She was in reality being bribed so people could attempt to salvage this country

Moral compass - FUBAR

a reply to: underpass61

great example.

a reply to: underpass61

that mindset is one of misplaced moral superiority. The idea that that person knows what's best and while everyone has the illusion of choice, they just aren't smart enough to make a good one, so they feel they should be the one's making that choice.

I think I'm a freaking genius, but I also know I was wrong once, and the thought of being wrong again, scares me.

originally posted by: mechtech87
Are you just writing fiction at this point? What version of reality are you living in that any of this makes sense in your head? Seriously it's concerning

originally posted by: network dude
First off, what is a BAMN never Trumper? BAMN is By Any Means Necessary. Meaning, there really is no limit to what could be done to remove this guy, as long as he's removed. Rules, laws, justice, is completely secondary to the core goal of removing Trump. Now I can totally see how folks would not like him. it's obvious most of his supporters don't "like" him. They like and support his policies. His personality, well, he's a dick. But so are many politicians, most of them smile and lie good enough that they seem much less dickish.

But once you identify yourself as a BAMN never Trumper, what then? Do you still get to pretend you have a moral compass on other topics? Or do you really need to reconcile the part where you are willing to ignore anything in order to get what you want? LOL, that all kind of depends on your moral compass. (a true conundrum) Keeping in mind this is just an opinion, how would someone with a firm moral compass be OK with using the court system to remove a political opponent? It seems that if that's really the case, the two ideas are in conflict with each other.

If you doubt the part where the court system has been weaponized against Trump, you really haven't been paying attention and have no business pretending to he honorable. 91 charges with 4 different indictments. Hell, NY made a new law just so a woman who claims Trump jumped her and raped her in a department store years ago could sue him, since the statute of limitations was long gone and he needed to be humiliated and bled of his cash BAMN. He's been charged and found guilty of fraud before the trial began, and his fraud was to do business in real estate. To date, Trump is the only person to be charged with this crime in NYC. He had to be done in, BAMN.

But what can you do if you hate Trump with every fiber of your being, you loath him more than you loath death itself. He makes you visible and physically ill just by existing. Do you jump on the "get Trump" bandwagon? If you can disregard what's fair you can. Fair. What would fair look like? Perhaps in the United States of America, it would look like people running political campaigns, sharing their vision for the future, and allowing the voters to decide. Maybe if the people really want the guy you can't stand, then the system we have in place should be what we follow.

Of course this is meant to prove a point. And I am biased in that I am someone who considers himself a conservative, and liked the results of Trump's ideas, but didn't like the personality and the stupid (punching down) he did often. (whomever used that earlier, thanks, it's a great way to describe this). In the future, do those of you who cheer this on, think you will be equally as fine with all this if the tables were turned? If it was a candidate you liked? A party you align with? I sure hope so. Because once something like this happens, it becomes "the new normal". And while it's anything but normal, and anyone with even a shred of dignity and integrity should never be in favor of things like this, it will probably happen again and again. Much like the idea of court packing the SCOTUS. If Biden was to appoint three new judges and bring the total to 12 rather than 9, he will win the battle today. But tomorrow, another battel will happen. And when the opposing side is in power, they will make it 15. And the cycle will continue until the high court is much like a very poorly delivered joke about a dead French leader.

So in conclusion, there are some words of wisdom that have helped guide me through my life, and I'll offer them here for anyone to read.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

Care to elaborate on what part of the OP is fiction?

I believe it’s more you reading the truth in the OP and it hurts your feelings because you are are one of the BAMN anti-Trumpers.

I see a very familiar writing style when you post, but it couldn’t be because you have multiple accounts, could it?