Trump J6 Case Mysteriously REMOVED from DC Court Docket

This is breaking now...and a bit curious.
The court docket had the case originally scheduled for March...but, now, without explanation, it has been removed.

Speculation points to it taking place due to requests made for the names of Jack Smith's prosecutors to be released...which Merrick Garland refuses to release.

Anna Paulina Luna speculates that the abrupt removal is due to her request for additional information:

Within hours of my office sending a letter asking Jack Smith to produce information regarding his investigation, his case against Trump is removed from the docket. Jack Smith owes the American people and Congress answers.

twitter.com... 3dca3d0583b3e923823bd1ce110f958%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independentsentinel.com%2Fdc-case-against-donald-trump-is-removed-from-the-cou rt-roster%2F

She believes Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional.

My colleagues and I have grave constitutional concerns about the appointment of Jack Smith. That is why I am demanding answers from him. Jack Smith has 9 days to respond.

twitter.com...

Whatever the reason...rabid Trump haters may just have to wait, possibly even until after the election...before they get their sweet release, accompanying wet nap and satisfying smoke.

www.independentsentinel.com...

Trump was scheduled to go to trial in the federal criminal case against him for trying to overturn the 2020 election, brought by special counsel Jack Smith—but the case has gotten delayed waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in on Trump’s motion to dismiss the charges, and it was removed from the court’s calendar, with presiding Judge Tanya Chutkan now scheduled to oversee other trials starting on March 18 and April 2.

[www.forbes.com... lection-case-gets-delayed/?sh=57670cdc2561]

It looks like it's just been delayed a bit. Anything to keep Orange Mad Bad in the news.....

From what I understand, it was removed because of the many different motions and appeals making their way through the courts.

Because of these the trial will not be able to take place on the previously scheduled date. Not do to any action on Smith's part, but because the court has a schedule to keep and this case would not make the cut.

It will be rescheduled at a later time.

a reply to: watchitburn

I'm guessing they'll move it to Nov 5th.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: watchitburn

I'm guessing they'll move it to Nov 5th.

...or until December 5th....after all the last minute mail-in ballots are "counted".

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: watchitburn

I'm guessing they'll move it to Nov 5th.

Bad guess.

Now that the J6 federal trial has slipped because of the pending appeal, that frees up the calendar for the NY State hush money case to start on March 25, which it was originally scheduled for and for which the Manhattan DA has been quietly preparing his witnesses. The good thing about that for us Trump haters is that if he is convicted in that case, neither he nor any other POTUS can pardon him or otherwise interfere in that case. Plus--as a bonus--he gets to go to Sing Sing correctional facility for males.

The J6 case can be rescheduled ASAP after that.

Trump is such a prolific criminal that he will have some trial or another going on pretty much continually between now and the election. He's the gift that keeps on giving.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

It might have a little something to do with this...

Special Counsel Jack Smith has been excoriated by a panel of four appellate court judges for his unprecedented search of a former president’s private communications.

The judges condemned Smith’s violation of executive privilege by searching former President Donald Trump’s Twitter files.

Judges Smack Down Jack Smith for Violating Trump’s Executive Privilege

...as well as some other items before the court including whether or not Smith is even legally appointed.

a reply to: Boomer1947

Another boost in the polls for Trump.
Keep those kangaroo court cases coming!

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: watchitburn

I'm guessing they'll move it to Nov 5th.

...or until December 5th....after all the last minute mail-in ballots are "counted".

And "cured" in some places like Arizona.

Ballot Curing in Arizona: What is it, and why you need to act now if you're affected

What is ballot curing? According to The Council of State Governments' website, ballot curing is a procedure where a voter, after they were notified of a signature-related error involving their ballot, is given time to correct that error.

"States conduct the curing process in different ways. Some states only allow voters to correct their ballots in cases of discrepancies in signature matching but not in cases of missing signatures. Other states require a witness signature on mail-in ballots alongside the voter’s," read a portion of the website.

What is the ballot curing rule for Arizona?

Under Arizona law, voters with inconsistent signatures on their early ballot, or voters who did not sign their early ballot, are given a chance to cure their ballots.

a reply to: Boomer1947

A prolific criminal. Name ONE criminal court case he has been convicted of? Just one....

a reply to: Klassified

This is so correct but people have been blinded to just accept and hate Trump. The council is as illegitimate as the 1/6 Pelosi commission.

There's nothing mysterious about it. The case is on hold pending the DC Circuit's immunity ruling. Despite saying they were going to expedite the case, it has now delayed the case for almost two months.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
There's nothing mysterious about it. The case is on hold pending the DC Circuit's immunity ruling. Despite saying they were going to expedite the case, it has now delayed the case for almost two months.

As judges mull presidential immunity, Trump reaps the benefits of delay

More than 50 days have elapsed since Trump’s criminal proceedings in a Washington, D.C., trial court — on charges for attempting to subvert the 2020 election — were paused indefinitely. They won’t resume until the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and, most likely, the Supreme Court resolve the question hanging over the entire case: whether Trump, as a former president, is immune from criminal prosecution.

Even if the appeal were resolved this week against Trump, that calculation would put his earliest trial date in late April. But if the D.C. Circuit and the Supreme Court take additional weeks or months to deliver a final ruling, the opening days of Trump’s trial could be pushed to the summer or fall.

If, at that point, Trump retains his grip on the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, he and his allies are certain to exert intense pressure to postpone the trial until after the election. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, could plow forward with a trial anyway — and she’s repeatedly indicated that the campaign calendar has no bearing on her own.

It's only been postponed for them to fabricate more damning evidence. Oh sorry, I meant time for them to investigate more lines of inquiry.

a reply to: crayzeed

It was postponed due to an appeal filed by Trump. Are you saying he's in on it?

Red Herring because Judge Tanya Chutkan is under investigation? 😀

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Boomer1947

A prolific criminal. Name ONE criminal court case he has been convicted of? Just one....

That doesn’t mean much. lol, they spent years trying to get John Gotti. He was always obviously a prolific criminal though.