It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whereislogic
At least that's the scene I immediately was reminded of when I read his comment. On a related note concerning the topic of this thread:
Why do people who voted for Donald Trump allow themselves to be played (scammed) like that?
...
Nationalism—The “Sacred Egoism” That Divides
Sometimes the people are not in favor of a war. On what basis, then, can the rulers most easily persuade the population to support their aims? This was the problem that faced the United States in Vietnam. So, what did the ruling elite do? Galbraith answers: “The Vietnam War produced in the United States one of the most comprehensive efforts in social conditioning [adjusting of public opinion] in modern times. Nothing was spared in the attempt to make the war seem necessary and acceptable to the American public.” [whereislogic: that word, "necessary", you will run into again and again in all sorts of propaganda, pro-war, pro-guns, pro-military propaganda, pro-Trump's 'wall', pro-immigration laws, etc. Yet in reality/truth, NONE of these things are "necessary".] And that points to the handiest tool for softening up a nation for war. What is it?
Professor Galbraith again supplies the answer: “Schools in all countries inculcate the principles of patriotism. . . . The conditioning that requires all to rally around the flag is of particular importance in winning subordination to military and foreign policy.” This systematic conditioning prevails in communist countries as it does in Western nations.
Charles Yost, a veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service and State Department, expressed it thus: “The primary cause of the insecurity of nations persists, the very attribute on which nations pride themselves most—their sovereign independence, their ‘sacred egoism,’ their insubordination to any interest broader or higher than their own.” This “sacred egoism” is summed up in divisive nationalism, in the pernicious teaching that any one nation is superior to all others.
Historian Arnold Toynbee wrote: “The spirit of nationality is a sour ferment of the new wine of democracy in the old bottles of tribalism.” In Power and Immortality, Dr. Lopez-Reyes wrote: “Sovereignty is a major cause of contemporary war; . . . unless altered, the system of sovereign nation-states will trigger World War III.” The emphasis on nationalism and sovereignty denies the basic concept that we all belong to the same human family, regardless of linguistic or cultural differences. And that denial leads to wars. [whereislogic: and immigration laws deemed and argued to be "necessary".]
Yes, the experts can come up with all kinds of explanations of why man systematically sets out to destroy those of his own kind. Yet there is one primary factor that most commentators ignore.
The Hidden Cause of War
...
originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: whereislogic
....
The last thing on everyone's mind is fear of whiteness being darkened...lol give me a break. They don't see that flooding the country with people would be a disaster and cost crazy levels of money. We can't even take care of our homeless who would cost less. These big cities are screaming that the small trickle of illegals being too much to handle, and they could be right. Think about that small trickle turned into a big flow of them. Where do they go, how do they live, where do they earn money, what do we do when schools are overflowing more than they are? The country is not ready for that...
originally posted by: whereislogic
So could you agree then that that argument plays on our fear of economic woe (or similar or connected material concerns, rather than spiritual concerns*)? So also playing on our love of money (2 Timothy 3:1-5; quoted in my first comment in this thread, the one with Meja's song that reminds us that "it's all 'bout the money"; "and I think we got it all wrong anyway")? There will be no monetary system in "God's Kingdom [ruled] by Christ Jesus." To use a phrase from this
originally posted by: whereislogic
a reply to: mysterioustranger
...
"so that unitedly you may with one voice* [Lit., “mouth.”] glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." (Romans 15:6) And who is that?
...
originally posted by: Xtrozero
... I'm not religious BTW.
...
Knowledge (gno'sis) is put in a very favorable light in the Christian Greek Scriptures. However, not all that men may call “knowledge” is to be sought, because philosophies and views exist that are “falsely called ‘knowledge.’” (1Ti 6:20) ...
... Thus Paul wrote about some who were learning (taking in knowledge) “yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge [...] of truth.” (2Ti 3:6, 7)
...
How does God view the “wisdom” offered by human philosophy?
1 Cor. 1:19-25: “It is written: ‘I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectual men I will shove aside.’ Where is the wise man? Where the scribe? Where the debater of this system of things? Did not God make the wisdom of the world foolish? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom did not get to know God, God saw good through the foolishness [as it appears to the world] of what is preached to save those believing. . . . Because a foolish thing of God [as the world views it] is wiser than men, and a weak thing of God [as the world may see it] is stronger than men.” (Such a viewpoint on God’s part is certainly not arbitrary or unreasonable. He has provided in the Bible, the most widely circulated book in the world, a clear statement of his purpose. He has sent his witnesses to discuss it with all who will listen. How foolish for any creature to think that he has wisdom greater than that of God!)
originally posted by: whereislogic
...
“... having an appearance of godliness but proving false to its power and from these turn away. From among these arise men who slyly work their way into households and captivate weak women loaded down with sins, led by various desires, always learning and yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge of truth.” (2Ti 3:5-7) (Keep in mind that Charles Darwin's only degree was a Bachelor of Arts in the Divine Studies, nowadays called theology, received from the Pagan Trinitarian philosophers that were his spiritual masters and teachers at Christ's College; with no supervision over a portion of his exams, in particular math if I remember correctly, which he took at home, in private, according to history, if one wants to believe he actually filled in his math exam himself and didn't let someone else do it for him, since he already couldn't cut it at Medical School, having dropped out of that PhD equivalent education. His grandfather Erasmus, from whom he took all his evolutionary ideas/philosophies, was a philosopher and Mother Nature/Gaia worshipper hanging out with mediums and psychics and such that were also nature worshippers in love with Pagan Greek philosophy about Gaia and pantheism.)
“Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to you, turning away from the empty speeches that violate what is holy and from the contradictions of the falsely called ‘knowledge.’ By making a show of such knowledge, some have deviated from the faith.
May the undeserved kindness be with you.” (1Ti 6:20,21)
...
... When these spiritual needs we were created with are fulfilled, the restlessness will give way to “the peace of God that excels all thought.”—Philippians 4:7; Genesis 1:26-28.
Acts 17:27, 28 recommends this groping, namely, “for them to seek God, if they might grope for him and really find him, although, in fact, he is not far off from each one of us. For by him we have life and move and exist.” It is by him, the Creator of the universe, including earth and us upon it, that we live and move and exist. Shedding the adornments and false doctrines of orthodox religions—which religions have turned millions away from God, including many scientists—and following the true worship of Jehovah God, we will gain life everlasting in a paradise earth, which was Jehovah’s purpose in creating the earth in the first place.—Genesis 2:15; Isaiah 45:18; Luke 23:43; John 17:3.
It takes tremendous credulity to think that intelligence of this magnitude resides in blind, brainless chance. It is a faith comparable to that of the pagan religionists of the prophet Isaiah’s time: “But you men are those leaving Jehovah, those forgetting my holy mountain, those setting in order a table for the god of Good Luck and those filling up mixed wine for the god of Destiny.” (Isaiah 65:11) [whereislogic: are you familiar with the term "chance and necessity", i.e. "luck" and "destiny", as used by evolutionists to promote their unverified philosophies and false stories/myths?] Evolutionists look to millions of “lucky” chances to produce man from rock, but they haven’t got off the ground to reach the first rung of their evolutionary ladder. Their “god of Good Luck” is a bruised reed.
Fred Hoyle feels an ominous foreboding in all of this: “Another point nagging me is a conviction that the window of opportunity for the human species may be very narrow in time. High technology is necessary to open the window, but high technology on its own, without establishing a relation between our species to the world outside the Earth, may well be a path to self-destruction. If on occasions in this book my opposition to the Darwinian theory has seemed fierce, it is because of my feeling that a society oriented by that theory is very likely set upon a self-destruct course.”
Alice, in the tale Through the Looking-Glass, incredulous at the strange logic of the White Queen, could only laugh. “There’s no use trying,” she said. “One can’t believe impossible things.” The queen responded: “I dare say you haven’t had much practice. When I was your age I did it for half an hour a day. Why sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” [whereislogic: evolutionary philosophers are also very fond of the saying: "speculation is free", no it isn't, not if you want to stick to the science/knowledge of facts/certainties/realities/truths.]
Evolutionists are the White Queens of today. They have had infinite practice in believing impossible things.
...
It also has been said that mutations may be a key to the rapid change called for by the “punctuated equilibrium” theory. Writing in Science Digest, John Gliedman stated: “Evolutionary revisionists believe mutations in key regulatory genes may be just the genetic jackhammers their quantum-leap theory requires.” However, British zoologist Colin Patterson observed: “Speculation is free. We know nothing about these regulatory master genes.”6 ...
originally posted by: whereislogic
...
Fraud in Science—The Greatest Fraud of All (Awake!—1990)
... It is a faith comparable to that of the pagan religionists of the prophet Isaiah’s time: “But you men are those leaving Jehovah, those forgetting my holy mountain, those setting in order a table for the god of Good Luck and those filling up mixed wine for the god of Destiny.” (Isaiah 65:11) [whereislogic: are you familiar with the term "chance and necessity", i.e. "luck" and "destiny", as used by evolutionists to promote their unverified philosophies and false stories/myths?] Evolutionists look to millions of “lucky” chances to produce man from rock, but they haven’t got off the ground to reach the first rung of their evolutionary ladder. Their “god of Good Luck” is a bruised reed....
...
Of course, some might argue that much of this relativism represents open-mindedness and therefore has a positive impact on human society. Does it really, though? And what about its impact on you? Do you believe that truth is relative or nonexistent? [whereislogic: or can't be figured out with certainty, i.e. you can't make sure of anything as recommended at 1 Thess 5:21 and Phil. 1:10. That idea/notion/philosophy being discussed in more detail at the start of the article. Quoting the likes of Descartes, who discarded all but one truth that he deemed incontrovertible: “Cogito ergo sum,” or, “I think, therefore I am.”] If so, searching for it may strike you as a waste of time. Such an outlook will affect your future.
[Footnotes]
* According to Bible scholar R. C. H. Lenski, Pilate’s “tone is that of an indifferent worldling who by his question intends to say that anything in the nature of religious truth is a useless speculation.”
MANY religious organizations claim to have the truth, and they offer it eagerly to others. However, between them they offer a dizzying profusion of “truths.” Is this just another evidence that all truths are relative, that there are no absolute truths? No.
In his book The Art of Thinking, Professor V. R. Ruggiero expresses his surprise that even intelligent people sometimes say that truth is relative. He reasons: “If everyone makes his own truth, then no person’s idea can be better than another’s. All must be equal. And if all ideas are equal, what is the point in researching any subject? Why dig in the ground for answers to archeological questions? Why probe the causes of tension in the Middle East? Why search for a cancer cure? Why explore the galaxy? These activities make sense only if some answers are better than others, if truth is something separate from, and unaffected by, individual perspectives.”
In fact, no one really believes that there is no truth. When it comes to physical realities, such as medicine, mathematics, or the laws of physics, even the staunchest relativist will believe that some things are true. Who of us would dare to ride in an airplane if we did not think that the laws of aerodynamics were absolute truths? Verifiable truths do exist; they surround us, and we stake our lives on them.
The Price of Relativism
...
originally posted by: whereislogic
You may actually have a leg up on those having fallen for false religion
Never before has so much been written that is nonsensical. In Roman times Paul told Christians not to act like the people of the nations, who “walk in the unprofitableness of their minds.” (Eph. 4:17, NW) Just how sadly unprofitable some of the writings of those minds must have been we can imagine from a discovery at Pompeii. It was the custom back then to write on the walls of buildings. Some shrewd reader and commentator of the writings of others had written on a wall in Pompeii the following in Latin: “It is a wonder, O wall, that thou hast not yet crumbled under the weight of so much written nonsense.”
originally posted by: whereislogic
...
These types (or those referred to) that are bragging about being at (sitting on) the summit of the metaphorical mountain they are referring to, actually haven't even passed the tree line of Jehovah's holy mountain yet:
[there was to be a video here where Dinesh D'Souza is being smug with that quote about evolutionists climbing a metaphorical mountain only to find the theologians sitting on the top waiting for them; but I can't find the video on youtube and I really don't feel like sifting through all of D'Souza's crap, no offense].
▪ What is false religion?
▪ How will it end?
▪ How will you be affected?
What Is False Religion?
Are you distressed about crimes committed in the name of religion? Do the warfare, terrorism, and corruption perpetrated by those who claim to serve God offend your sense of justice? Why does religion seem to be at the root of so many problems?
The fault lies, not with all religion, but with false religion. A widely respected religious figure, Jesus Christ, indicated that false religion produces bad works, just as a “rotten tree produces worthless fruit.” (Matthew 7:15-17) What fruit does false religion yield?
False Religion . . .
◼ MEDDLES IN WAR AND POLITICS: “Across Asia and beyond,” says the journal Asiaweek, “power-hungry leaders are cynically manipulating people’s religious sentiments for their own needs.” As a result, the journal warns: “The world threatens to sink into madness.” A prominent religious leader in the United States declared: “You’ve got to kill the terrorists before the killing stops.” His solution? “Blow them all away in the name of the Lord.” By contrast, the Bible says: “If anyone makes the statement: ‘I love God,’ and yet is hating his brother, he is a liar.” (1 John 4:20) Jesus even said: “Continue to love your enemies.” (Matthew 5:44) How many religions can you think of whose members engage in war?
◼ SPREADS FALSE DOCTRINE: Most religions teach that the soul or spirit is some invisible part of a human that survives the death of the physical body. By means of this teaching, many of these religions exploit their members, charging money to pray for departed souls. However, the Bible teaches a different doctrine. “The soul that is sinning—it itself will die.” (Ezekiel 18:4) “The living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all.” (Ecclesiastes 9:5) Jesus taught that the dead will be resurrected—an unnecessary action if humans had an immortal soul. (John 11:11-25) Does your religion teach that the soul does not die?
...
originally posted by: whereislogic
I'm sorry, I was being too insensitive to you with my joke before, which was in bad taste. I do consider you to be a victim of those feeding you faulty reasoning and arguments and manipulating you. Also, I failed to keep in mind you are at a severe disadvantage, not having the same type of access to the same teachings that expose the ones who have been manipulating you since your birth. You've been duped over and over, and I really should keep in mind what kind of long-term effect that has on you.
That longing that you wake up from what has been done to you, accompanied by continued failures on my part to wake you up, gets frustrating. I see so much potential going to waste, and I end up making jokes in bad taste. But the metaphor I am using is fairly accurate, and you still have a right to know. .
What you expressed also saddened me greatly,
originally posted by: Xtrozero
...
Lol, nothing you say can hurt my feelings, so have fun.
I was in the military for 28 years, with very harden skin. I'm not really duped into anything as I do not care to invest any of my time one way or the other.
I also would not want to be a part of any religion Jehovah's Witness or otherwise.
Have you ever been on a cruise?
... cause I know who conditioned you with that feeling. ... boring or monotonous
originally posted by: Xtrozero
...
I just do not see the need for a God, and I see religion as a by-product of a human's ability to think and make things in the abstract world.