Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

a reply to: JinMI

Cuz they think he did it and they wanna take him for all he’s worth.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

Only those in New York City.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

So you agree then it's not about justice or law.


It's about Trump.

I already established this with you. Even gave you a trophy!

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: charlest2

Ok now you’re discriminating against all New Yorkers.

New yorkers are some of the most Biased people in america. If you are not a raging Democrat they tend to railroad you under the illusion of fairness. Hand picking a jury is flat wrong,and is not a jury of ones peers in reality.
For a fair trial it should had been moved to another venue.

a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Defemation is not a thing?

You seem to be the one with hurt feelings…

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Were they right?

I'm waiting patiently for someone to come along and sort it out for me.

Will it be you to show what testimony convinced you that Trump caused this woman 80 some million in damages?

a reply to: JinMI

Well this DJT seems like such a train wreck, I can’t stay away from commenting.

My question is, will he blow his top? With a whole weekend before us, will he blow a hole in the world wide web with ranting and further spouting invectives at her so that he can be sued again? For more?

a reply to: JinMI

It is about the accusation against him, and how much money he has.

You can’t prove the accusation is wrong, like I said.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: JinMI

Well this DJT seems like such a train wreck, I can’t stay away from commenting.

You've demonstrated NPC.

Now you've demonstrated "Rent Free."

Going for the hat trick?

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Were they right?

I'm waiting patiently for someone to come along and sort it out for me.

Will it be you to show what testimony convinced you that Trump caused this woman 80 some million in damages?

60 million was punitive, as I understand it, to deter trump from continuing his attacks. And obviously the jury agreed.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
My question is, will he blow his top? With a whole weekend before us, will he blow a hole in the world wide web with ranting and further spouting invectives at her so that he can be sued again? For more?

Got a quote Terry that convinced you that Trump is liable for this 80m?

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Defemation is not a thing?

You seem to be the one with hurt feelings…

I smell jury coaching. Salted Jury. 😃

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Were they right?

I'm waiting patiently for someone to come along and sort it out for me.

Will it be you to show what testimony convinced you that Trump caused this woman 80 some million in damages?

60 million was punitive, as I understand it, to deter trump from continuing his attacks. And obviously the jury agreed.

Do you think it's part of our legal system to ascribe a monetary penalty on free speech? Especially speech that has yet to be said?

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Were they right?

I'm waiting patiently for someone to come along and sort it out for me.

Will it be you to show what testimony convinced you that Trump caused this woman 80 some million in damages?

60 million was punitive, as I understand it, to deter trump from continuing his attacks. And obviously the jury agreed.

Do you think it's part of our legal system to ascribe a monetary penalty on free speech? Especially speech that has yet to be said?

I agree with the concept of defamation. If that is what you are asking then yes.

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Were they right?

I'm waiting patiently for someone to come along and sort it out for me.

Will it be you to show what testimony convinced you that Trump caused this woman 80 some million in damages?

60 million was punitive, as I understand it, to deter trump from continuing his attacks. And obviously the jury agreed.

Do you think it's part of our legal system to ascribe a monetary penalty on free speech? Especially speech that has yet to be said?

I agree with the concept of defamation. If that is what you are asking then yes.

Defamation exists in the past tense. What you described is future tense.

Try again?

a reply to: JinMI

Are you aware you are talking about yourself?

You blindly follow Trump, can’t accept it when he loses, and get triggered at anyone suggesting Trump is a loser.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: JinMI

Are you aware you are talking about yourself?

I was not.

Please explain.

a reply to: JinMI

I added a sentence to my comment to explain

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: EndTime
a reply to: JinMI

So the entire jury was wrong?

Were they right?

I'm waiting patiently for someone to come along and sort it out for me.

Will it be you to show what testimony convinced you that Trump caused this woman 80 some million in damages?

60 million was punitive, as I understand it, to deter trump from continuing his attacks. And obviously the jury agreed.

Do you think it's part of our legal system to ascribe a monetary penalty on free speech? Especially speech that has yet to be said?

I agree with the concept of defamation. If that is what you are asking then yes.

Defamation exists in the past tense. What you described is future tense.

Try again?

We now need to consider repeat offences, the trial is about repeative Trump defaming (past tense) someone, to prevent future instances. I agree with deterrence.