Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

a reply to: JinMI

You keep saying defamation. Yet haven't posted what convinced you that she was defamed.

Social media posts and live interviews.

It's irrelevant because it's all going to Carroll minus attorney fees. How does this keep him from "defaming others.?' The purpose of this thread is for folks to show me where the defamation is and how it's worth 80m.

The prospect of further financial punitive measures is the deterrence from further defamation.

Again, 18 million for specific defamation, the rest punitive to prevent future instances.

a reply to: JinMI

You can talk about the difference batten rape and sexual assault if you want, but I won’t be joining that discussion with you.

I’m trying to keep the conversation high level, and all signs seem to be pointing to DJT being a loser.

a reply to: EndTime

Social media posts and live interviews.

Which? Which one(s) convinced you? C'mon man, this shouldn't be difficult.

The prospect of further financial punitive measures is the deterrence from further defamation.

Again, 18 million for specific defamation, the rest punitive to prevent future instances.

Which doesn't mean anything. Because it's all going to Carroll.

Is that a just amount in your estimation and can you explain why and how?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Apparently.

But the question on the table. Is it right? Is it justice?

This is what we call justice. Yes.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

You can talk about the difference batten rape and sexual assault if you want, but I won’t be joining that discussion with you.

That's fine. As there exists evidence of neither. Unless you've something to show.....

I’m trying to keep the conversation high level, and all signs seem to be pointing to DJT being a loser.

What you would consider high level is entertainment for me. So by all means, keep posting.

Also while you're at it find that piece of evidence that you are standing behind to bolster your already made up mind.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Apparently.

But the question on the table. Is it right? Is it justice?

This is what we call justice. Yes.

There's a quote of you in my signature that speaks to your version of justice Sookie.

Your opinion is met with equal merit.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

I’m trying to keep the conversation high level, and all signs seem to be pointing to DJT being a loser.

Really?
Because you seem like you are reading off a cue card of canned responses that the Democrats sent you to repeat over and over and over.

Here is the high level question again……why was there no criminal trial for rape?

a reply to: JinMI

Which? Which one(s) convinced you? C'mon man, this shouldn't be difficult.

I was not one of the jurists, and I have rendered no personal opinion on the case, only the validity of certain aspects of law.

Which doesn't mean anything. Because it's all going to Carroll. Is that a just amount in your estimation and can you explain why and how?

So? The amount was proposed and justified by the prosecution, and the jury agreed

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Apparently.

But the question on the table. Is it right? Is it justice?

This is what we call justice. Yes.

There's a quote of you in my signature that speaks to your version of justice Sookie.

Your opinion is met with equal merit.

LOL
Fool! You know I'm paraphrasing Trump is that citation of yours. www.abovetopsecret.com...

But you go on ahead and keep beating that dead horse.....if it makes you feel good.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Apparently.

But the question on the table. Is it right? Is it justice?

This is what we call justice. Yes.

Where was the justice for Tara Reade after she accused Biden of sexual assault?

Remember your Liberal Queen Kamala Harris accused Biden in the debates of being a rapist?

How #ing convenient of you to forget that tidbit.

You guys have no credibility left. None. None whatsoever.

a reply to: RazorV66

There's no criminal trial for rape because there was no case brought before the statute of limitations were out. But you know that.

In fact, they had to create a law in order to sue in civil court. You may ask, "how did they do that?!"

Well, it's the same people who financed this case! But you already knew that too.

Then it comes to the case itself. The evidence. The only evidence is testimony, therefore that must be scrutinized. Content of character as well as reputation. Yet, those were not allowed for Trump to challenge.....

Fine, then allow for a timeline? Nope
How about challenging DNA? Nope
Politics, financing and history? NOPE!!!

But you already knew this as well.



So, barring all that, I'm here simply asking what piece of testimony convinced others that this 80m price tag is justice.

To no ones surprise, page 6 has resulted in absolutely nothing.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

But you go on ahead and keep beating that dead horse.....if it makes you feel good.

The sentiment is mutual.

You've proven to be an unshakable rock despite all factual information.

a reply to: RazorV66

Because she wouldn’t have won a criminal trial. But she won a civil trial. Will you accept the loss?

a reply to: JinMI

I was waiting for Mr Cue Card to give a “high level” response, he didn’t know the answer.

It was all a scam of course and all we get is these drones parroting what they are told to say.

a reply to: EndTime

I was not one of the jurists, and I have rendered no personal opinion on the case, only the validity of certain aspects of law.

You've undermined the law in favor of your personal opinion. Pre crime for instance.

So? The amount was proposed and justified by the prosecution, and the jury agreed

Well, yes. That's what happened.

The question is was it lawful and just. In your opinion.

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: JinMI

I was waiting for Mr Cue Card to give a “high level” response, he didn’t know the answer.

It was all a scam of course and all we get is these drones parroting what they are told to say.

It is fun exposing it though, innit?

I miss the old lefties who actually came equipped with brains, facts and a perspective that was their own.

a reply to: JinMI

You've undermined the law in favor of your personal opinion. Pre crime for instance

You agreed with punitive deterrence in a prior post did you not?

Well, yes. That's what happened. The question is was it lawful and just. In your opinion.

Fully lawful, thus the verdict.

What was unlawful in your opinion?

a reply to: RazorV66

I did answer your question. Will you answer mine, if you will accept this loss for DJT?

a reply to: JinMI

What is being exposed is how easy the Trump fan boys are to trigger.

a reply to: RazorV66

Remember your Liberal Queen Kamala Harris accused Biden in the debates of being a rapist?

LOL No.

How #ing convenient of you to forget that tidbit.

Neer happened!
During a debate you say? It should be all over YouTube. Post it! Otherwise...LOL