It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

page: 38
18
<< 35  36  37    39  40  41 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 08:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
Where did you read this? i didnt get ANYTHING of what you are talking about.


Oh, AHAHAHAHA, you're telling me to read your link and then saying my reading comprehension is poor. You didn't read it and/or YOUR reading comprehension is poor...


"Getting out of jury duty is easy. The trick is to say you're prejudiced against all races."



The article...


It isn't an article, it's a dopey opinion piece written by a teenager.


I've only be called for jury duty once, and I'm, uh, a couple of years beyond my 18th birthday.





edit on 4-2-2024 by AugustusMasonicus because: dey terk yer election



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 08:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 09:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI




By that logic, then testimony is not tangible therefore not evidence.


No. Logically, reality doesn't require tangible evidence to exist.


That's right, that's why witness testimony and the defendant's character and behaviour was front and centre in this trial and the preponderance of the evidence is all that was needed to sway the two juries. So it appears that was the evidence. It's time.
edit on q00000011229America/Chicago4141America/Chicago2 by quintessentone because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.
edit on q00000003229America/Chicago3737America/Chicago2 by quintessentone because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Go Annee go! It's a mind bender for sure.


edit on q00000000229America/Chicago1515America/Chicago2 by quintessentone because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

You already agreed he didn't rape her.

That's the sum and substance.


You played your hand already.




posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Defend law and justice.

Defend victims like you.


As usual though, your ability to grasp reality is just out of reach.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Defend law and justice.

Defend victims like you.


As usual though, your ability to grasp reality is just out of reach.


I realize you think you are a good debater.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 02:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Defend law and justice.

Defend victims like you.


As usual though, your ability to grasp reality is just out of reach.


I realize you think you are a good debater.



No Annee, I don't even think I'm above average intelligence.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 02:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Defend law and justice.

Defend victims like you.


As usual though, your ability to grasp reality is just out of reach.


I realize you think you are a good debater.



No Annee, I don't even think I'm above average intelligence.



posted on Feb, 4 2024 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Go Annee go! It's a mind bender for sure.



And so moving on from “real” reality.

Maybe someone will surprise me. There’s always hope.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 04:22 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Thats your opinion. Im sure you can grasp the meaning of me holding up my middle finger.

Needless to say the judge got his way with the picking of the jury. just like they wanted and got a jury to railroad trump yet again,in a state where they know they can do it with no consequences.
edit on 24000000ppam by yuppa because: edited statement to reflect truth



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 04:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Sham case set in place by the liberal agenda.
The lady is a nut ball who’s own actions an memories call it all into question.


Most likely the trauma of being sexually assaulted took precedent over what time it was, at the time.


I was forcibly raped in my own home by an ex-boyfriend.

I let him in -- because I knew him, and he was never forceful before.

Could not tell you the date or time. I think it was in the afternoon.

"He said - she said" -- I voluntarily let him in.

Trauma stays with you -- it never goes away. 40 years later "Coulda - Shouda - Woulda" still bounces around in my psych.

I have a psychology friend who specializes in PTSD. He says you have one choice and that is to confront it. You cannot bury trauma.

I think, not only E Jean Carroll, but a lot of women are feeling impowered now.

There is no other way (or in the past) this would have gone to trial and the woman actually won.











I am sorry for your pain and I agree facing it head on is the only way. Go Carroll go!

We absolutely know what would have happened back then and so did Carroll and one of her friends that she told what happened to. One friend advised her to go to the police, the other advised not to because she would not be believed and there would be backlash. Lose - lose scenario for women at that time and even still today depending on whether or not you confided in anyone, got a rape test done etc. because there are never any witnesses - NEVER.


ABSOLUTELY!!!!


And still we get the self-righteous know-it-alls -- who's only goal is to defend Trump.


Go Annee go! It's a mind bender for sure.



And so moving on from “real” reality.

Maybe someone will surprise me. There’s always hope.


You mean beside cleansing all leftist from america?



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 04:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Justice for Tara Riede, oh wait, never mind.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 06:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Annee

Justice for Tara Riede, oh wait, never mind.


Accusations happen all the time. Some are credible — some are not.

Oh, wait — it’s against Biden . . .



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 08:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

There is a difference between defending and discussing facts. It scares me and should scare everyone that this instance could happen to anyone.

I have two boys. I have told them my story from being younger and having a false accusation. It was horrible. I was exonerated because I was working, and had proof, of when I was supposed to have done that act.

However, with this precedent if I then told people I had not raped her I could get sued.

Let that sink in.

This is not about the Orange Man. This is about an out of control court system especially in NY.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 08:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Annee

Justice for Tara Riede, oh wait, never mind.


Accusations happen all the time. Some are credible — some are not.

Oh, wait — it’s against Biden . . .


...and against any blue state's legal system being corrupt, just like any blue state's voting systems - all corrupt except red states are doing it right.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

There is a difference between defending and discussing facts. It scares me and should scare everyone that this instance could happen to anyone.

I have two boys. I have told them my story from being younger and having a false accusation. It was horrible. I was exonerated because I was working, and had proof, of when I was supposed to have done that act.

However, with this precedent if I then told people I had not raped her I could get sued.

Let that sink in.

This is not about the Orange Man. This is about an out of control court system especially in NY.


I had a friend — still in high school — but 18 years old.

He and his buddies were goofing around. He grabbed a trashcan lid and threw it at his friend.

This was at night. He accidentally hit a woman walking her dog. He was arrested on attempted murder with a deadly weapon.

Fortunately, like you he got off.

Trump is a serial adulterer and womanizer. Fact.

But — AGAIN — this trial was about defamation.

Trump can’t keep his mouth shut. He is his own worst enemy.

The NY court system did not make Trump run his mouth. As a matter of fact — they tried to do the opposite.

Trump is responsible for Trump.




top topics



 
18
<< 35  36  37    39  40  41 >>

log in

join