It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Onthelowdown
a reply to: Annee
Let's be honest. You vote for abortion and global warming. Trump does not support either policy, so you would like to drag him through the justice system and have his rights removed? Many of his supporters don't agree with all of his policies, but we agree with his leadership. I suspect that atleast half of the US thinks infanticide is wrong and global climate initiatives are a grand scheme to defraud and control us. Should everyone who disagrees with you have their rights and wealth and freedom removed? Or just Donald Trump?
originally posted by: Onthelowdown
a reply to: Annee
People that murder babies are evil.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee
" I support LIVING CHILDREN. I don’t deny school lunches or food stamps. I don’t put children in cages."
Little Johnny Agrees with you . He Wants a LIFE too .........
originally posted by: Annee
Evil is religious terminology.
Reproduction is a biological mechanism requiring no intelligence whatsoever.
Every living thing reproduces — it’s really not that special.
I support LIVING CHILDREN. I don’t deny school lunches or food stamps. I don’t put children in cages.
originally posted by: MrGashler
originally posted by: Annee
Evil is religious terminology.
Reproduction is a biological mechanism requiring no intelligence whatsoever.
Every living thing reproduces — it’s really not that special.
I support LIVING CHILDREN. I don’t deny school lunches or food stamps. I don’t put children in cages.
There's that moral relativism.
Be sure to tell your children that their conception and birth is nothing special and that you could've killed them before they were born if you felt like it. Might as well be honest with them right?
You should be really careful about the terminology you use. "Living Children"? Am I to understand that your position is that unborn children are not alive?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MrGashler
originally posted by: Annee
Evil is religious terminology.
Reproduction is a biological mechanism requiring no intelligence whatsoever.
Every living thing reproduces — it’s really not that special.
I support LIVING CHILDREN. I don’t deny school lunches or food stamps. I don’t put children in cages.
There's that moral relativism.
Be sure to tell your children that their conception and birth is nothing special and that you could've killed them before they were born if you felt like it. Might as well be honest with them right?
You should be really careful about the terminology you use. "Living Children"? Am I to understand that your position is that unborn children are not alive?
I am always honest with my children. I was married, they were planned by both me and their father.
They know I had an abortion -- as I chose them -- their welfare over popping out an unwanted pregnancy.
YES! Their welfare -- LIVING CHILDREN
Again -- reproduction is a biological function that requires no thought or intelligence.
I choose modern science that gives me the intelligent option to accept this biological function or terminate it.
Define "alive" vs living. Being little more than "parasite" is not a LIVING CHILD.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MrGashler
originally posted by: Annee
Evil is religious terminology.
Reproduction is a biological mechanism requiring no intelligence whatsoever.
Every living thing reproduces — it’s really not that special.
I support LIVING CHILDREN. I don’t deny school lunches or food stamps. I don’t put children in cages.
There's that moral relativism.
Be sure to tell your children that their conception and birth is nothing special and that you could've killed them before they were born if you felt like it. Might as well be honest with them right?
You should be really careful about the terminology you use. "Living Children"? Am I to understand that your position is that unborn children are not alive?
I am always honest with my children. I was married, they were planned by both me and their father.
They know I had an abortion -- as I chose them -- their welfare over popping out an unwanted pregnancy.
YES! Their welfare -- LIVING CHILDREN
Again -- reproduction is a biological function that requires no thought or intelligence.
I choose modern science that gives me the intelligent option to accept this biological function or terminate it.
Define "alive" vs living. Being little more than "parasite" is not a LIVING CHILD.
A question for you Annee . Do you think 95% of the girls who have gotten abortions since the passing of Roe v Wade have put as much thought and understanding into what an Abortion is as you have and did when you made the decision ?
I sat in a Car in front of a ' Planned Parenthood ' for about two hours one time ' I was taking a friend it was her decision and had nothing to do with me in any way shape or form .... Do you know what I saw while sitting in the car ?
I saw a never ending Train of young Minorities walking in and out of that 'Planned Parenthood ' and I mean non-stop one would leave one would walk in . 60+ million abortions Annee something had to be done .
Do I believe woman have the right to choose ? Yes I do . But in the same breath these young woman need to learn the consequences of their actions and practice some self discipline and self control.
originally posted by: mikell
My understanding is the state has no rights in federal elections. Or limited rights and definitely not the right to kick someone off.
Just something from a good constutional lawyer
Uhh, my daughters have walked in and out of planned parenthood multiple times. You know why? Because they offer gynecological services.