It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
All the information was anonymized. Anyway, the cops have all the data if they put him in a court of law it is going to get more interesting.
He probably has signed up to comply with data protection laws, it's probably standard boilerplate in his employment contract.
I have worked with medical databases some years ago, and encryption, and data protection are hammered in to all the IT support guys, repeatedly. This guy knew what he was doing was contrary to the law.
I wonder how much he was getting paid to break the law?
originally posted by: Rosby123
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
All the information was anonymized. Anyway, the cops have all the data if they put him in a court of law it is going to get more interesting.
He probably has signed up to comply with data protection laws, it's probably standard boilerplate in his employment contract.
I have worked with medical databases some years ago, and encryption, and data protection are hammered in to all the IT support guys, repeatedly. This guy knew what he was doing was contrary to the law.
I wonder how much he was getting paid to break the law?
Too much speculation.
Probably this and probably that.
At the end of the day he was arrested for having access to the data and sharing it with others. They have nothing to be afraid of if the data is clear and truthful.
originally posted by: Mahogani
a reply to: annonentity
Who is bona fide? You didn't even list his name, I have to click on a bitchute link (which I won't do) to find out what you're even talking about.
Can you tell us his name so I can do some research on him from more credible sources?
Also, can you link to where the NZ government states this man is "bona fide"?
Arigato.
a reply to: chr0naut
When asked what brought him to speak up and take such a risk, Smith said, “I saw too much that I couldn’t do nothing anymore.”
He continued, “And someone said that bad things happen when good people do nothing. And that was obvious during World War II when Germany went and killed millions of innocent people. We know that they’re not all bad people. Germans are not all bad people. So there were good people. They just followed orders. They were just told what to do and just went along with it.”
“One of the reasons why this is happening now is that good people are not doing enough to stop it,” he continued.
I wonder how much he was getting paid to break the law?
originally posted by: kwaka
a reply to: chr0naut
Julian Assange got free accommodation for his efforts. To even think that he is doing this for some click bait cash does give the impression that you are getting paid well to keep the official narrative alive. As an IT guy, you know what kind of trouble he is in.
I wonder how much he was getting paid to break the law?
Covid does not fully explain this:
Source
So it looks like the police just passed it onto the courts. Is it going to be a railway job and send to message to everyone else to shut up or are the courts going a acknowledge that there is a bigger problem here?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Rosby123
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
All the information was anonymized. Anyway, the cops have all the data if they put him in a court of law it is going to get more interesting.
He probably has signed up to comply with data protection laws, it's probably standard boilerplate in his employment contract.
I have worked with medical databases some years ago, and encryption, and data protection are hammered in to all the IT support guys, repeatedly. This guy knew what he was doing was contrary to the law.
I wonder how much he was getting paid to break the law?
Too much speculation.
Probably this and probably that.
At the end of the day he was arrested for having access to the data and sharing it with others. They have nothing to be afraid of if the data is clear and truthful.
Data, and especially medical data, can be misused criminally.
Even if he didn't misuse the data, he took private and secured data that could be damaging to people, and put it in a publicly accessible place.
As I pointed out, the conclusions he was drawing from the data in the video, were not actually consistent with the data itself. He was misrepresenting the data, and was making allegations of criminality against specific people who were only doing their job and probably had no idea that their patients were later going to die. The data he presented was also missing any mention of cause of death, and he has assumed that every case was therefore the vaccine, something which neither the data, nor any clinical evidence, has shown.
You see, if you are worried about my 'speculation', what about the speculation on the anti-vax side of the argument?- A balanced view would be skeptical of both sides, and would seek for, and evaluate, evidence. At present, neither you nor I really have all the facts. What we have is necessarily, speculation.
originally posted by: Rosby123
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Rosby123
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
All the information was anonymized. Anyway, the cops have all the data if they put him in a court of law it is going to get more interesting.
He probably has signed up to comply with data protection laws, it's probably standard boilerplate in his employment contract.
I have worked with medical databases some years ago, and encryption, and data protection are hammered in to all the IT support guys, repeatedly. This guy knew what he was doing was contrary to the law.
I wonder how much he was getting paid to break the law?
Too much speculation.
Probably this and probably that.
At the end of the day he was arrested for having access to the data and sharing it with others. They have nothing to be afraid of if the data is clear and truthful.
Data, and especially medical data, can be misused criminally.
Even if he didn't misuse the data, he took private and secured data that could be damaging to people, and put it in a publicly accessible place.
As I pointed out, the conclusions he was drawing from the data in the video, were not actually consistent with the data itself. He was misrepresenting the data, and was making allegations of criminality against specific people who were only doing their job and probably had no idea that their patients were later going to die. The data he presented was also missing any mention of cause of death, and he has assumed that every case was therefore the vaccine, something which neither the data, nor any clinical evidence, has shown.
You see, if you are worried about my 'speculation', what about the speculation on the anti-vax side of the argument?- A balanced view would be skeptical of both sides, and would seek for, and evaluate, evidence. At present, neither you nor I really have all the facts. What we have is necessarily, speculation.
That's another speculation.
You we don't have all the facts and I agree with this but you almost immediately accused him of misrepresenting and misusing the data in a criminal manner.
I am glad you have acknowledged somewhere else in this page the excess deaths in most other countries around the world. I don't know what the situation is in NZ. The excess non Covid deaths should be a big red flag against the covid campaign and the vaccines and most excess deaths are non Covid deaths.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
The Only People Not Outraged by this News are the Ones who have become Deceased from the " Side Effects " of these mRNA Vaccines........